Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardGeneral Method of Reasoning

Sociologist: Traditional economic models assume that individuals make charitable donations primarily to maximize the overall utility of the beneficiaries. Critics of this model point out that donors frequently contribute to highly visible, prestigious charities rather than those with the highest measurable impact per dollar. These critics conclude that such charitable giving is driven entirely by a desire for social status. This conclusion is unwarranted. The critics fail to consider that donors might genuinely believe that prestigious organizations, by virtue of their prominence, possess a unique capacity to leverage funds effectively on a macroeconomic scale.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the method of reasoning employed by the sociologist?

  1. challenging an inference drawn from a set of observations by demonstrating that those observations can be readily accommodated by the theory that the inference was intended to discreditAnswer
  2. B
    rejecting a conclusion by disputing the factual accuracy of the behavioral patterns cited as evidence for that conclusion
  3. C
    criticizing an argument for failing to define adequately the criteria used to evaluate the efficiency of different charitable organizations
  4. D
    defending a theoretical model by arguing that the model was never intended to account for the specific type of behavior highlighted by its critics
  5. E
    arguing that the critics have mistakenly assumed that a desire for social status is incompatible with a desire to maximize the utility of beneficiaries

Answer

The option stating that the sociologist challenges an inference drawn from a set of observations by demonstrating that those observations can be readily accommodated by the theory that the inference was intended to discredit.
The correct answer accurately describes the structural dynamic of the passage. The 'theory' is the traditional economic model of utility maximization. The 'observations' are the donations made to highly visible charities. The 'inference' is the critics' conclusion that such donations are driven by social status. The sociologist undermines this inference by showing that donating to a highly visible charity can be seen as an attempt to maximize utility (due to macroeconomic leverage), thus 'accommodating' the observation within the original theory.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the original theory presented in the stimulus.
The traditional economic model assumes donations are made to maximize the overall utility of beneficiaries.
Understanding the baseline theory is necessary to analyze the subsequent critique and defense.
2
Analyze the critics' argument.
Critics observe people donating to prestigious (but seemingly less efficient) charities and infer this contradicts the traditional theory, concluding that donations are actually driven by a desire for social status.
Identifying the opposing viewpoint provides the target of the sociologist's counterargument.
3
Determine the sociologist's counter-strategy.
The sociologist provides an alternative reason for donating to prestigious charities: donors believe these charities have macroeconomic leverage. This belief represents a strategy to maximize utility.
This isolates the exact logical mechanism the author uses to defeat the critics' conclusion.
4
Synthesize the mechanism into abstract terms.
The author takes the critics' evidence (donating to prestigious charities) and shows how it actually fits perfectly into the original theory (utility maximization), thereby destroying the critics' inference (desire for status).
Method of reasoning questions require translating specific argumentative moves into abstract, structural descriptions.

Key Concept

General Method of Reasoning
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Rate this question

Topics

General Method of Reasoning

More questions from this topic