Read the following passage regarding the evolution of consumer protection law.
During the late nineteenth century, the traditional jurisprudential doctrine of *caveat emptor* ("let the buyer beware") began to erode in the United States, giving way to an embryonic framework of consumer protection. Legal historians attribute this doctrinal shift to a confluence of structural market transformations rather than sudden judicial enlightenment. The increasing mechanical complexity of manufactured goods was paramount, rendering it practically impossible for the average consumer to inspect products for latent defects prior to purchase. This informational asymmetry was compounded by a newly impersonal market, a direct result of national advertising campaigns that encouraged buyers to rely heavily on manufacturers' indirect representations rather than face-to-face assurances from local merchants. Furthermore, the chain of liability was systematically obscured as mass-production techniques geographically separated the locus of manufacture from the point of retail sale. The judiciary eventually responded to these structural realities by expanding the concept of implied warranty, most notably when the landmark 1916 decision in *MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.* abolished the strict requirement of privity of contract in negligence claims. Direct federal intervention in standardized product labeling, conversely, remained virtually nonexistent until the New Deal era.
Based on the passage, evaluate the following statement:
The passage explicitly includes the increasing mechanical complexity of goods, the rise of national advertising campaigns, and the geographical separation of manufacturing from retail sales among the structural market transformations that catalyzed the erosion of *caveat emptor*, but NOT the abolition of the privity of contract requirement.
Answer: Answer