Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardSufficient Assumption

Philosopher: A political doctrine cannot be considered genuinely egalitarian unless it categorically repudiates the concept of inherited executive authority, except in systems where the exercise of such authority is entirely symbolic. The foundational charters of the Valesian Order establish a governance model predicated on inherited executive authority. Consequently, the Valesian charters fail to offer a genuinely egalitarian political doctrine.

Which one of the following, if assumed, enables the philosopher's conclusion to be properly drawn?

  1. No governance model predicated on inherited executive authority restricts the exercise of that authority to entirely symbolic functions.Answer
  2. B
    Any political doctrine that restricts the exercise of inherited executive authority to entirely symbolic functions qualifies as genuinely egalitarian.
  3. C
    A genuinely egalitarian political doctrine cannot establish a governance model predicated on any form of executive authority, whether symbolic or not.
  4. D
    If the foundational charters of the Valesian Order had categorically repudiated inherited executive authority, they would constitute a genuinely egalitarian political doctrine.
  5. E
    The foundational charters of the Valesian Order were explicitly designed to establish a governance model that is not genuinely egalitarian.

Answer

The correct assumption is that no governance model predicated on inherited executive authority restricts the exercise of that authority to entirely symbolic functions.
The philosopher's rule states that to be genuinely egalitarian, a doctrine must EITHER repudiate inherited authority OR possess authority that is entirely symbolic. The Valesian charters do not repudiate inherited authority. Therefore, to validly conclude that they are definitively not egalitarian, we must assume they also fail the second condition (i.e., their authority is not entirely symbolic). The correct statement provides a universal rule that any model with inherited authority (which the Valesian charters have) inherently fails to be entirely symbolic. This closes the logical gap and forces the conclusion to be 100% true.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Map the formal logic of the philosopher's primary principle.
Genuinely Egalitarian -> Repudiates Inherited Authority OR Authority is Entirely Symbolic.
The phrase 'cannot be... unless... except when' creates a compound necessary condition. A doctrine must meet at least one of those two conditions to be considered egalitarian.
2
Analyze the application of the principle to the Valesian Order.
The Valesian charters establish inherited authority, meaning they fail the 'Repudiates Inherited Authority' condition.
The stimulus states the charters are 'predicated on inherited executive authority.'
3
Identify the logical gap leading to the conclusion.
The author concludes the charters are NOT egalitarian. For this to be definitively true, the charters must also fail the second necessary condition: their authority must NOT be entirely symbolic.
If the Valesian authority were entirely symbolic, it could still theoretically be egalitarian under the philosopher's rule. We must eliminate this possibility to guarantee the conclusion.
4
Evaluate the correct assumption.
The statement 'No governance model predicated on inherited executive authority restricts... to entirely symbolic functions' translates to: Inherited Authority -> NOT Entirely Symbolic.
Because the Valesian charters have inherited authority, this assumption guarantees their authority is not entirely symbolic, failing both necessary conditions and strictly proving they are not egalitarian.

Key Concept

Sufficient Assumptions with Compound Necessary Conditions
Rate this question

Topics

Sufficient Assumption

More questions from this topic