Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardNecessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws

Legal Scholar: Establishing a comprehensive multilateral framework for planetary orbital debris mitigation cannot be accomplished unless aerospace corporations are mandated to disclose their proprietary trajectory algorithms. Furthermore, any such framework requires the creation of an independent orbital enforcement tribunal. The proposed Neo-Space Treaty explicitly mandates that all signatory aerospace entities fully disclose their trajectory algorithms and includes provisions for the immediate establishment of an independent enforcement tribunal. Therefore, the implementation of the Neo-Space Treaty will inevitably result in the successful establishment of a comprehensive multilateral framework for debris mitigation.

Which one of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the legal scholar's reasoning?

  1. It mistakes the fulfillment of multiple prerequisites for a particular outcome as constituting a set of conditions that are jointly sufficient to bring about that outcome.Answer
  2. B
    It concludes that a condition is necessary for a particular outcome to occur merely on the grounds that the condition is sufficient to produce that outcome.
  3. C
    It infers that because a condition sufficient to ensure a given outcome has not been met, that outcome cannot possibly occur.
  4. D
    It takes for granted that the signatory nations will actually enforce the binding provisions they have nominally adopted in the treaty.
  5. E
    It draws a conclusion about the inevitable success of the treaty based on an equivocal use of the concept of a multilateral framework across the premises.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the argument mistakes the fulfillment of multiple prerequisites for a particular outcome as constituting a set of conditions that are jointly sufficient to bring about that outcome.
The argument establishes that two elements—algorithm disclosure and an enforcement tribunal—are necessary prerequisites for a multilateral framework ('cannot be accomplished unless', 'requires'). It then demonstrates that the proposed treaty includes both of these elements, and concludes that the treaty will definitively result in the framework. This reasoning is flawed because satisfying the necessary conditions for an outcome does not guarantee that the outcome will occur; there may be other unstated requirements. The correct answer accurately identifies this illegal reversal by pointing out that the argument treats prerequisites (necessary conditions) as jointly sufficient conditions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's conclusion.
The implementation of the Neo-Space Treaty will inevitably result in a comprehensive multilateral framework for debris mitigation.
Isolating the conclusion is the first step in evaluating any argument's logical structure.
2
Analyze the premises providing support.
A multilateral framework requires algorithm disclosure and an enforcement tribunal. The Neo-Space Treaty provides both of these elements.
Understanding the evidence provided reveals the structural basis of the author's inference.
3
Diagram the conditional logic.
Framework -> (Disclosure AND Tribunal). The Treaty provides (Disclosure AND Tribunal). Therefore, Treaty -> Framework.
Formalizing the logic exposes the structural relationship between the conditions and the outcome.
4
Identify the logical flaw.
The argument commits an illegal reversal. It assumes that fulfilling the necessary conditions (the right side of the arrow) guarantees the sufficient condition (the left side of the arrow).
Comparing the premises to the conclusion reveals that the author treats required prerequisites as a guarantee of success.

Key Concept

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws
Rate this question

Topics

Necessary vs. Sufficient Condition Flaws

More questions from this topic