For decades, the Standard Consolidation Theory (SCT) has dominated neurobiological models of memory. SCT posits that the hippocampus is only temporarily necessary for the retrieval of declarative memories—both episodic (personal experiences) and semantic (general facts). According to SCT, as memories mature, they are gradually consolidated into the neocortex, eventually becoming entirely independent of the hippocampus.
However, the Multiple Trace Theory (MTT) challenges this unified model. Proponents of MTT argue that while semantic memories do indeed become independent of the hippocampus over time, episodic memories rely on the hippocampus for as long as they exist. According to MTT, every time an episodic memory is retrieved, the hippocampus creates a new memory trace, expanding the memory's representation across neural networks. Consequently, older memories are more resilient to brain damage not because they have migrated to the neocortex, but because they possess a greater number of hippocampal traces. MTT also asserts that the severity of retrograde amnesia for autobiographical events is strictly proportional to the extent of hippocampal damage, a correlation that SCT struggles to fully explain.
According to the passage, proponents of the Multiple Trace Theory assert all of the following EXCEPT:
- AEvery instance of recalling a personal experience generates a new memory trace in the hippocampus.
- BGeneral factual knowledge eventually ceases to depend on the hippocampus for retrieval.
- CThe hippocampus is permanently required for the recollection of autobiographical events.
- The resilience of older episodic memories is due to their gradual relocation to the neocortex.Answer
- EThe severity of retrograde amnesia for episodic events corresponds directly to the amount of damage sustained by the hippocampus.