Question

Difficulty: HardWeaken

Agronomist: In a controlled trial, strawberry plants treated with a foliar spray containing the bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens exhibited a 70 percent reduction in gray mold infection relative to untreated controls. Because this bacterium synthesizes antifungal lipopeptides that inhibit fungal spore germination, applying this bacterial spray will reliably eliminate the need for synthetic chemical fungicides in commercial strawberry cultivation.

Statement: If true, the discovery that solar ultraviolet radiation in typical open-field commercial farms degrades these lipopeptides within two hours, whereas the trial was conducted inside a greenhouse that filtered out all ultraviolet light, weakens the agronomist's argument.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True
The evaluated statement correctly identifies a fatal flaw in the agronomist's reasoning: the assumption of generalizability from a shielded experimental trial to unshielded commercial fields. Exposing that solar ultraviolet light neutralizes the antifungal lipopeptides in real-world settings directly undermines the prediction that the bacterial spray can replace synthetic fungicides.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Isolate the conclusion and supporting premises of the argument.
Premise: In a controlled trial, bacterial spray reduced gray mold by 70% by producing antifungal lipopeptides. Conclusion: Applying the spray will reliably eliminate the need for synthetic chemical fungicides in commercial strawberry cultivation.
Deconstructing the core argument structure is necessary to pinpoint the exact logical leap made by the author.
2
Identify the unstated assumption connecting the premises to the conclusion.
The author assumes that the biological efficacy demonstrated in the controlled trial will persist under the practical operating conditions of commercial strawberry fields.
Weaken questions frequently target unstated assumptions regarding the generalizability of experimental data to broader practical contexts.
3
Assess the logical impact of the supplementary statement on the conclusion.
The supplementary fact reveals that the greenhouse setting shielded the bacteria from solar ultraviolet light that rapidly destroys its active compounds in commercial open fields, invalidating the projection of commercial efficacy.
Demonstrating that the mechanism fails in the target environment directly weakens the argument's conclusion.

Key Concept

Identifying unrepresentative experimental conditions that invalidate practical generalizations in causal and predictive arguments.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Rate this question

Topics