Question

Difficulty: MediumEvaluating Intermediate Conclusions

Behavioral Economist: In corporate retirement plans, participation rates soar when employees are automatically enrolled rather than required to actively opt in. Studies indicate that making enrollment the default drastically reduces the initial administrative effort required to start saving, while completely preserving the employees' freedom of choice to opt out later. Therefore, default enrollment policies effectively overcome the psychological inertia that typically prevents people from saving. Consequently, companies that truly wish to maximize their employees' long-term financial well-being must universally adopt automatic enrollment programs.

Which one of the following most accurately describes the role played in the behavioral economist's argument by the claim that default enrollment policies effectively overcome the psychological inertia that typically prevents people from saving?

  1. It is a subsidiary conclusion drawn from evidence about reduced administrative effort, which in turn is used to support the argument's ultimate recommendation.Answer
  2. B
    It is the argument's main conclusion, which is directly supported by evidence regarding employee participation rates and administrative effort.
  3. C
    It is background information intended merely to introduce the widespread financial phenomenon that the economist is attempting to resolve.
  4. D
    It is an independent premise that relies on a shifting definition of psychological inertia to justify the preservation of employee choice.
  5. E
    It is a broad psychological generalization introduced to suggest that external interventions are universally required to change human behavior.

Answer

The correct option is the one stating that it is a subsidiary conclusion drawn from evidence about reduced administrative effort, which in turn is used to support the argument's ultimate recommendation.
The correct answer accurately captures the dual nature of the target claim. The word 'Therefore' indicates it is a conclusion supported by the preceding sentence (about reducing administrative effort). At the same time, it serves as the foundational reason for the final sentence ('Consequently, companies... must universally adopt...'). This makes it a subsidiary, or intermediate, conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The main conclusion is the final sentence: companies must universally adopt automatic enrollment programs to maximize financial well-being.
Finding the main conclusion provides the anchor for evaluating the structural role of all other statements in the stimulus.
2
Identify the primary premises serving as foundational evidence.
The foundational premise is that default enrollment reduces initial administrative effort while preserving freedom of choice.
We must locate the raw evidence that grounds the argument's claims.
3
Analyze the relationship between the target statement, the premises, and the main conclusion.
The target statement (default policies overcome psychological inertia) is a deduction drawn from the premise about reduced effort. In turn, this deduction provides the logical justification for the main conclusion.
This establishes the exact structural function of the claim in the argument's chain of reasoning.
4
Define the structural role based on the relationship analyzed in Step 3.
Because the statement is both supported by a premise and supports the main conclusion, its structural role is exactly that of a subsidiary (or intermediate) conclusion.
This directly answers the question stem and aligns with the correct option.

Key Concept

Evaluating Intermediate Conclusions
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question