Question

Lindo: To alleviate the severe housing shortage, the city must abolish single-family zoning regulations. While introducing high-density residential development will inevitably alter the historical character of the neighborhoods where it occurs, the resulting expansion in housing supply will drive down average rents. However, we must retain our strict municipal permitting fees on new construction. Without the revenue generated by these specific fees, the city cannot adequately fund the infrastructure upgrades required to support higher population densities.

Kael: Abolishing single-family zoning is indeed essential for increasing the housing supply, an expansion that will ultimately reduce average rent prices. But the claim that high-density development inevitably alters the historical character of the neighborhoods where it occurs is unfounded; strict design guidelines can entirely preserve a neighborhood's aesthetic heritage. Furthermore, retaining municipal permitting fees is a mistake. The infrastructure required for higher densities can be adequately funded through the expanded property tax base instead of permitting fees. Moreover, the popular notion that imposing rent control policies would alleviate the housing shortage is fundamentally flawed; such policies merely restrict new construction.

Analyze the dialogue between urban planner Lindo and economist Kael. Match each proposition below to the correct description of the speakers' stances on that proposition.