Agricultural Economist: In the province of Vallesia, smallholder tomato farmers historically suffered severe post-harvest crop losses due to fungal spoilage during transit. Three years ago, the regional agricultural ministry subsidized the distribution of solar-powered ventilated storage crates. Over the subsequent two years, recorded post-harvest tomato losses across the province fell by nearly 60 percent, leading the ministry to conclude that the crates were responsible for the improvement. However, during the exact same period, an unseasonably severe drought lowered ambient humidity throughout Vallesia's transport corridors. Because ambient fungal spore germination is heavily inhibited in arid conditions, the reduction in tomato spoilage was almost certainly caused by the drought rather than the ventilated crates.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the agricultural economist's argument?
- ADuring earlier droughts of equal severity in Vallesia that occurred before the ventilated crates were introduced, post-harvest tomato spoilage rates remained as high as during years with normal humidity.
- BThe governmental subsidies covered only a fraction of the total manufacturing and distribution costs associated with producing the ventilated crates.
- Smallholder tomato farmers in Vallesia who continued using traditional unventilated crates throughout the two-year drought experienced a decrease in fungal spoilage comparable to that reported by farmers using the ventilated crates.Answer
- DEvery commercial agricultural crop cultivated in Vallesia requires high levels of atmospheric moisture to maintain optimal post-harvest shelf life during transport.
- EThe solar-powered fans in the ventilated crates malfunctioned frequently on overcast days, causing internal humidity within the crates to fluctuate.