In contrasting the jurisprudential realities of two distinct colonial epochs, a legal historian notes a profound, albeit often overlooked, continuity. Orthodox historiography generally dictates that the formal dissolution of the imperial charter immediately ushered in a more progressive, rights-based legal framework. However, archival records demonstrate that even after the establishment of a nominally independent appellate judiciary, the draconian evidentiary standards of the old absolutist regime continued to obtain in the rural magistrate courts for nearly another century. This geographical bifurcation created a dualistic legal reality that confounds linear narratives of reform.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the meaning of the word "obtain" as it is used in the passage?
- AAcquire or gain possession of a physical object or legal right
- BTransition formally into a progressive, rights-based framework
- CRequire or necessitate strict adherence to draconian rules
- Prevail, exist, or remain established in practiceAnswer
- EPertain exclusively to the prosecution of severe criminal offenses