Question

Difficulty: EasyFunction of Detail in Context

Consider the following excerpt from a passage on legal interpretation:

"While legal formalists contend that judicial rulings can be derived strictly through mechanical deduction from existing statutes, this stance neglects the pervasive ambiguity of statutory terms. For example, a municipal ordinance forbidding 'vehicles in the park' leaves open whether battery-powered mobility scooters or bicycles are prohibited, obliging judges to weigh legislative purpose rather than apply pure formal logic."

Statement: In the context of the excerpt, the author refers to the ordinance forbidding 'vehicles in the park' primarily to provide an example illustrating the statutory ambiguity that challenges mechanical deduction.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True
The statement accurately identifies the rhetorical function of the cited detail. The author introduces the 'vehicles in the park' ordinance immediately after claiming that legal formalists ignore statutory ambiguity, using the example as concrete evidence of how ambiguous language forces judges beyond rote deduction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Locate the cited detail and identify its immediate surrounding context in the excerpt.
The reference to the ordinance prohibiting 'vehicles in the park' is preceded by 'For example' and immediately follows the claim that formalism 'neglects the pervasive ambiguity of statutory terms.'
Analyzing how a specific detail connects to the preceding assertion is necessary to determine its rhetorical function.
2
Evaluate whether the cited detail serves to illustrate statutory ambiguity.
The scenario demonstrates that the phrase 'vehicles in the park' is ambiguous regarding devices like battery-powered scooters, proving that judges cannot rely solely on mechanical deduction.
This confirms that the primary structural role of the detail is to provide a concrete instance illustrating statutory ambiguity.

Key Concept

Function of Detail in Context
Rate this question