Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumFalse Dilemma (False Dichotomy)

Identify the specific false dichotomy in each scenario by pairing the flawed argument with the alternative possibility it fails to consider.

  • The city council asserts that we must either rezone the historic waterfront for heavy industrial use, or accept that our municipality will inevitably face total bankruptcy.Fails to consider that municipal revenue could be stabilized through alternative means, such as commercial revitalization or eco-tourism, without industrial development.
  • Since completely eliminating artificial intelligence tools from university assignments is practically impossible, instructors have no choice but to permit students to use AI without any restrictions.Ignores the possibility of establishing specific, targeted guidelines for acceptable technology use rather than choosing strictly between an absolute ban and total permissiveness.
  • To combat the sudden emergence of the stem-borer pest, our farming collective must either adopt the harsh chemical pesticide immediately, or resign itself to the complete destruction of this year's harvest.Neglects the potential efficacy of alternative mitigation strategies, such as introducing natural predators or utilizing resistant seed varieties, to manage the agricultural threat.
  • Because transitioning the corporation to a permanently remote workforce would severely damage our collaborative culture, we must mandate that all employees return to the physical office five days a week.Overlooks the viability of a hybrid operational model where staff divide their schedules between in-person collaboration and off-site remote work.

Answer

The correct pairings connect each restrictive binary argument to the realistic middle-ground or alternative option it ignores, leaving the cost-benefit distractor unmatched.
Each correct pair accurately identifies a false dichotomy by pointing out a specific, viable alternative that the original argument unfairly excluded. By revealing a middle ground or a different approach entirely, the matching descriptions successfully diagnose the logical flaw in each scenario.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the first argument to identify the two extreme options presented.
The zoning argument forces a choice between heavy industrial use and total bankruptcy.
Identifying the explicit binary is the first step in spotting a false dilemma.
2
Evaluate the available descriptions to find the overlooked alternative for the zoning argument.
The description mentioning alternative municipal revenue (like eco-tourism) breaks the binary.
A false dilemma is resolved by demonstrating a viable third option.
3
Repeat the analysis for the artificial intelligence argument, which presents a binary between complete elimination and zero restrictions.
The description suggesting targeted guidelines provides the overlooked middle ground.
Recognizing false extremes helps identify the logical flaw in technology policy arguments.
4
Analyze the agriculture argument's binary of harsh chemicals versus complete harvest destruction.
The description detailing alternative mitigation strategies like natural predators is the correct match.
This highlights the failure to consider other available interventions in agricultural management.
5
Analyze the workplace argument's binary of a fully remote model versus a strict five-day return.
The description detailing a hybrid operational model accurately identifies the ignored alternative.
This exposes the flaw of treating partial adoption as impossible in a corporate setting.

Key Concept

False Dilemma (False Dichotomy)
Rate this question

Topics

False Dilemma (False Dichotomy)

More questions from this topic