Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumExplaining Surprising Outcomes

Match each paradoxical situation on the left with the statement on the right that most logically resolves the apparent discrepancy.

  • A hospital facing a severe shortage of qualified nurses recently decreased the starting salaries for its newly hired nurses.The hospital implemented a comprehensive tuition coverage program for advanced degrees, which is highly attractive to recent graduates and offsets the lower base pay.
  • Traffic congestion in a city's downtown area worsened after the introduction of a popular free public bicycle-sharing program.The bicycle initiative required the removal of multiple key vehicle traffic lanes, while the bicycles are utilized predominantly by individuals who previously walked or used the subway.
  • The release of an expensive premium version of a productivity app caused a sudden, massive surge in sales of the previously stagnant basic version.The high price point of the newly introduced tier altered consumers' perception of value, causing the original tier to seem like a highly cost-effective alternative by comparison.
  • Despite a massive increase in residential solar panel installations following a new subsidy, the total residential electricity drawn from the city's main grid did not decrease.The perceived environmental benefits and financial savings from the panels led these homeowners to abandon previous energy-conservation habits and run high-consumption appliances more frequently.

Answer

The hospital paradox is resolved by the tuition program; the traffic paradox by the lane removal and user demographics; the app sales paradox by the shifted perception of value; and the solar panel paradox by the increase in overall energy consumption.
Each correct match provides a new piece of information that bridges the gap between the two seemingly contradictory facts presented in the paradox. By addressing alternative compensation, capacity reduction, psychological price anchoring, and behavioral rebound effects, the correct statements fully resolve their respective discrepancies.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the hospital labor shortage paradox.
The discrepancy is lowering wages during a shortage. The resolution must provide an alternative incentive that outweighs the lower pay, which matches the tuition coverage program.
To resolve a labor paradox, we need a factor that increases the job's attractiveness independent of the base salary.
2
Analyze the traffic and bicycle program paradox.
The discrepancy is more alternative transport leading to worse traffic. The resolution must show cars were not reduced while road capacity was, which matches the lane removal and pedestrian usage statement.
A paradox involving worsened conditions despite an apparent solution usually means the solution actively harmed the existing infrastructure or didn't target the actual source of the problem.
3
Analyze the app sales paradox.
The discrepancy is a new expensive product boosting sales of an old stagnant one. The resolution must explain a change in consumer behavior toward the old product, matching the shift in value perception.
When a new product impacts the sales of an existing product, it typically alters the comparative landscape or consumer psychology.
4
Analyze the solar panel paradox.
The discrepancy is increased solar capacity not reducing grid reliance. The resolution must explain an offset in the savings, matching the behavioral shift of using high-consumption appliances.
A paradox where increased efficiency or capacity fails to yield expected reductions often points to a simultaneous increase in usage (a rebound effect).

Key Concept

Identifying the Apparent Discrepancy and bridging the gap with new, logically sufficient information that allows both original facts to coexist.
Rate this question

Topics

Explaining Surprising Outcomes

More questions from this topic