Question

Difficulty: MediumFunction of Detail in Context

Passage:
In her 1940s cytogenetic investigations of Zea mays, Barbara McClintock challenged the prevailing consensus that genetic loci were immutable by demonstrating that mutable kernel variegation resulted from mobile controlling elements. Conventional geneticists had long attributed variegated kernel patterns to unstable chemical mutations occurring at fixed chromosomal loci. McClintock refuted this orthodoxy by documenting recurrent, non-random physical breakages at a specific site on chromosome 9, which she designated the Dissociation (Ds) locus, occurring whenever a second regulatory element, Activator (Ac), was present.

Statement: In the passage, the author references the physical breakages at the Dissociation (Ds) locus primarily to provide observable cytological evidence that links physical chromosomal movement to phenotypic variation, thereby challenging the model of fixed-locus chemical mutations.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True
The statement is correct because the author mentions the physical breakages at the Ds locus specifically as the empirical linchpin that demonstrated chromosomal movement, directly rebutting the prevailing view that kernel variegation was caused by chemical changes at fixed loci.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the passage structure and surrounding argumentative context of the referenced detail.
The passage establishes a contrast between the historical consensus (variegation caused by chemical mutations at fixed loci) and McClintock's theory of mobile genetic elements.
Determining the author's overarching argument is necessary to evaluate the rhetorical role of any supporting detail.
2
Determine why the author specifically mentions the physical breakages at the Dissociation (Ds) locus.
The physical breakages provide direct microscopic evidence of chromosomal alteration, serving as the empirical mechanism that refuted the fixed-locus mutation hypothesis.
Function of detail questions evaluate the argumentative purpose of evidence rather than its literal content alone.
3
Evaluate the truth value of the statement against the identified rhetorical function.
The statement precisely summarizes this evidentiary relationship, confirming that the claim is true.
A functional claim is valid when it correctly maps the detail's relationship to the surrounding claims.

Key Concept

Function of Detail in Context
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question