Agricultural scientists monitoring soil chemistry across regional test plots established the following conditions:
• Any soil amendment containing mycorrhizal inoculants enhances phosphorus uptake in legume crops only if the soil pH remains strictly below 7.0.
• Every experimental plot treated with calcified biochar maintains a soil pH of 7.4 or higher throughout the growing season.
• All experimental plots in the valley trial were treated with calcified biochar.
• During the previous season, several experimental plots in the valley trial produced legume crops that exhibited enhanced phosphorus uptake.
If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them?
- AAny experimental plot in which the soil pH remains below 7.0 will produce legume crops that exhibit enhanced phosphorus uptake.
- BTreating an experimental plot with mycorrhizal inoculants is sufficient to prevent the soil pH from reaching 7.4.
- In at least some experimental plots where legume crops exhibited enhanced phosphorus uptake, the applied soil amendment did not contain mycorrhizal inoculants.Answer
- DNo experimental plot treated with calcified biochar can sustain any form of nutrient uptake in legume crops.
- EThe experimental plots in the valley trial produced higher overall crop yields than plots treated with mycorrhizal inoculants.
Answer
In at least some experimental plots where legume crops exhibited enhanced phosphorus uptake, the applied soil amendment did not contain mycorrhizal inoculants.
The conclusion logically follows from the premises: every plot in the valley trial was treated with calcified biochar (yielding pH >= 7.4), which precludes mycorrhizal inoculants from enhancing phosphorus uptake (since mycorrhizal enhancement requires pH < 7.0). Because several valley trial plots nevertheless had legume crops with enhanced phosphorus uptake, those specific enhancements must have occurred without mycorrhizal inoculants.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Combining universal conditional statements and existential premises via contrapositive deduction