Read the following passage excerpt concerning the development of English equitable jurisdiction:
"In the fifteenth-century English legal system, the rigid pleading requirements of the common law courts frequently precluded adequate remedies for complex disputes, prompting litigants to petition the King's Chancellor for relief based on 'equity and good conscience.' As these interventions coalesced into the institutional Court of Chancery, the tribunal's most consequential innovation became the enforcement of the 'use'—a juridical arrangement where land was conveyed to a nominal owner (the feoffee to uses) strictly for the benefit of another (the cestui que use). Because common law jurisprudence recognized exclusively the feoffee’s legal title and proved blind to the beneficiary’s equitable interest, feoffees could theoretically misappropriate the land with impunity. The Chancellor, however, intervened in personam to compel the feoffee to honor the beneficiary's interest. Crucially, because feudal incidents such as wardship and relief—lucrative taxation mechanisms for the Crown—attached exclusively to legal title rather than equitable interest, the Chancellor's enforcement of the use inadvertently provided a mechanism for widespread tax evasion, fundamentally threatening royal revenues and provoking a jurisdictional crisis."
Statement: The author's reference to "feudal incidents such as wardship and relief" serves primarily to articulate the economic mechanism by which a juridical innovation inadvertently precipitated a broader institutional conflict.
Answer: Answer