Read the following excerpt from a philosophical essay on epistemic harm, and based strictly on the author's provided framework, match each specialized term to the definition that most accurately reflects its stipulative meaning.
"In contemporary epistemology, theorists differentiate between several distinct modes of cognitive harm. 'Testimonial injustice' transpires when prejudice causes a hearer to assign a deflated level of credibility to a speaker's testimony. By contrast, 'hermeneutical injustice' arises when a structural gap in collective interpretive resources places a subject at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their own social experiences. Beyond these foundational concepts, scholars have delineated 'epistemic exploitation'—the uncompensated, unrecognized pedagogical labor extracted from marginalized individuals who are compelled to educate dominant groups about the nature of their oppression. Finally, 'willful hermeneutical ignorance' describes a privileged group's active refusal to adopt the available interpretive tools necessary to comprehend the structural disadvantages faced by others, thereby insulating the prevailing epistemic status quo."
- Testimonial injusticeThe unwarranted devaluation of an individual's status as a reliable informant, stemming from identity-based prejudice.
- Hermeneutical injusticeA systemic disadvantage in meaning-making caused by a society-wide deficiency in the conceptual tools needed to articulate lived realities.
- Epistemic exploitationThe unremunerated appropriation of a subjugated person's intellectual effort to elucidate the mechanisms of their own marginalization.
- Willful hermeneutical ignoranceThe intentional preservation of conceptual blind spots by those in power to avoid engaging with frameworks that expose systemic inequity.