Question

Difficulty: MediumInferences from the Text

For over a century, classical archaeologists dated Hellenistic civic inscriptions primarily through epigraphic stylistic analysis—the practice of comparing letter forms, such as the serifs and curvature of Greek characters, against inscriptions of previously established dates. However, the discovery of closed stratigraphic coin hoards at several Anatolian sites has revealed significant discrepancies in these stylistic chronologies. In multiple documented excavations, municipal decrees bearing letter forms traditionally assigned to the late third century BCE were uncovered directly beneath undisturbed strata containing silver tetradrachms minted during the reign of Seleucus I (305–281 BCE). Because a decree cannot logically postdate an undisturbed layer deposited above it, these physical stratigraphic sequences demonstrated that certain archaic-style stonecutters' conventions persisted in regional workshops decades longer than classic stylistic sequences had assumed, or conversely, that innovative cursive flourishes appeared much earlier than conventional models allowed.

Based on the passage, which of the following is most strongly supported regarding the dating of Hellenistic civic inscriptions?

  1. A
    Regional stonecutters across Anatolia uniformly adopted innovative cursive lettering techniques prior to the reign of Seleucus I.
  2. B
    Numismatic evidence from coin hoards provides an absolute and infallible calendar date for every architectural stratum in which it is found.
  3. Inscriptions exhibiting letter forms characteristic of a later era may have actually been engraved during an earlier chronological period than stylistic analysis alone would suggest.Answer
  4. D
    Epigraphic stylistic analysis has been completely abandoned by archaeologists as an unreliable method for dating ancient texts.
  5. E
    Silver tetradrachms minted under Seleucus I were specifically produced to commemorate the municipal decrees found in the Anatolian strata.

Answer

The statement that inscriptions exhibiting letter forms characteristic of a later era may have actually been engraved during an earlier period than stylistic analysis alone would indicate is the correct inference.
The passage states that decrees with letter forms traditionally dated to the late third century BCE were excavated directly beneath undisturbed strata containing coins minted between 305 and 281 BCE. Since the physical strata dictate that the decrees cannot postdate the layer above them, the letter forms must have existed by or before 281 BCE. Thus, it follows directly that inscriptions exhibiting letter styles associated with a later period could have actually been produced in an earlier period than stylistic analysis alone would dictate.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core premise and physical evidence presented in the passage
Decrees with letter forms assigned to the late third century BCE were found beneath undisturbed strata containing coins from 305–281 BCE.
Establishing the physical sequence is essential to determining which chronological deductions are strictly valid.
2
Analyze the logical implication of the stratigraphic law described
Because an underlying decree cannot be newer than the undisturbed layer above it, the decrees must date to 305–281 BCE or earlier, meaning their 'late third-century' letter forms actually existed earlier than stylistic models assumed.
This bridges the empirical discovery to the inference about the limitations of relying purely on letter style.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against this direct deduction
The statement expressing that inscriptions with seemingly late letter forms may have been carved earlier than stylistic dating suggests is strictly entailed.
LSAT inference questions require selecting the claim that must be true or is most strongly supported without introducing unwarranted assumptions or extreme language.

Key Concept

Drawing precise textual inferences from empirical relationships and qualifying scope
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question