Question

Difficulty: HardExclusion Questions (EXCEPT/LEAST/NOT)

When speakers of mutually unintelligible languages are forced into prolonged contact, they often develop a pidgin—a structurally impoverished communicative code lacking a stable grammar. If children are born into a community where a pidgin is the primary linguistic input, they do not acquire the pidgin; rather, they spontaneously generate a fully functional, syntactically complex language known as a creole. In the 1980s, linguist Derek Bickerton proposed the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis (LBH) to explain this phenomenon. Bickerton noted that geographically isolated creoles—ranging from Hawaiian Creole English to Haitian Creole—exhibit striking structural similarities despite having no historical contact. For instance, most creoles employ preverbal markers to indicate tense, mood, and aspect, rather than using the complex morphological inflections characteristic of European superstrate languages. According to Bickerton, because the impoverished pidgin input is structurally insufficient to explain this complex grammar, children must draw upon an innate linguistic bioprogram, hardwired into the human brain, to construct the language's syntax.

The LBH, while influential, has faced robust opposition from 'substratists,' who argue that the structural similarities among creoles are not the product of an innate biological template, but rather the result of shared linguistic inheritances from the substrate languages—the native languages of the original adult pidgin speakers. Substratists point out that the vast majority of Atlantic creoles share distinct structural affinities with a specific subset of West African languages. Furthermore, sociohistorical evidence suggests that the transition from pidgin to creole is rarely the abrupt, single-generation metamorphosis posited by Bickerton. Instead, demographic records indicate that many creoles underwent a gradual, multi-generational process of syntactic complexification, heavily influenced by continuous influxes of adult bilinguals.

Based on the passage, which of the following is NOT a premise or observation relied upon by Bickerton's Language Bioprogram Hypothesis (LBH)?

  1. The structural similarities found across different creoles are largely attributable to the grammatical features of the native languages spoken by the original adult population.Answer
  2. B
    The transition from a rudimentary contact code to a fully functional language occurs rapidly over the course of a single generation.
  3. C
    Creole languages that developed independently in disparate regions of the world exhibit notable syntactic parallels despite a lack of historical interaction.
  4. D
    Creole grammars typically favor the use of preverbal markers over morphological inflections to convey temporal and aspectual information.
  5. E
    The primary linguistic input provided to the first generation of creole speakers is structurally insufficient to account for the resulting language's grammatical complexity.

Answer

The statement attributing structural similarities across creoles to the grammatical features of the original adult population's native languages.
The correct answer accurately reflects the 'substratist' viewpoint, which the passage introduces as a robust opposition to Bickerton's Language Bioprogram Hypothesis (LBH). Because Bickerton argues that structural similarities arise from an innate biological template rather than the linguistic inheritances of adult speakers, this claim is the clear exception that the LBH does NOT rely upon.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the question stem to identify the specific viewpoint and constraints being tested.
The question asks for an observation or premise that is NOT relied upon by Bickerton's Language Bioprogram Hypothesis (LBH).
Recognizing the 'NOT' indicator and the specific focus on Bickerton's viewpoint is crucial for filtering the options correctly.
2
Scan the passage to isolate the claims explicitly associated with Bickerton and the LBH.
Bickerton claims: creoles develop spontaneously from impoverished pidgins; isolated creoles share structural similarities (e.g., preverbal markers); the pidgin input is insufficient; and the transition is an abrupt, single-generation metamorphosis driven by an innate bioprogram.
Establishing the boundaries of Bickerton's theory prevents confusing his premises with those of his critics.
3
Evaluate each option against the isolated LBH claims to find the exception.
Four options paraphrase Bickerton's observations (insufficient input, geographic parallels, rapid single-generation transition, preverbal markers). One option attributes creole similarities to the native languages of adult pidgin speakers.
Process of elimination confirms which statements are supported by the LBH and which one contradicts it.
4
Verify the source of the contradictory statement in the passage.
The statement about native languages of the original adult population belongs to the 'substratists,' who oppose the LBH.
Confirming that the exception is a rival theory's premise ensures it is the correct answer.

Key Concept

Distinguishing distinct viewpoints and utilizing process of elimination in exclusion-based reading comprehension questions.
Rate this question