Wildlife biologists managing a temperate river basin installed extensive artificial gravel spawning beds to reverse a persistent multi-year decline in the river's native salmon population. Comprehensive aquatic surveys over the following three years revealed that the intervention was a clear biological success at the early developmental stage: egg deposition rates and juvenile hatch counts across the river basin more than tripled relative to pre-installation benchmarks. Nevertheless, annual counts of mature adult salmon returning from the ocean to spawn in the river system declined even more rapidly over those same three years than they had in the period preceding the intervention. Which of the following, if true, most helps to resolve the apparent discrepancy described above?
- AThe installation of the artificial spawning beds displaced several non-salmonid benthic fish species that previously occupied those riverbed sectors.
- BNeighboring river systems that did not install artificial gravel spawning beds experienced an increase in the number of returning mature adult salmon over the same three-year period.
- Dense spatial clustering of newly hatched fry around the artificial gravel beds attracted unprecedented concentrations of predatory fish and birds, which consumed juvenile salmon in such high volumes that fewer total smolts survived to complete their seaward migration than when spawning was naturally dispersed.Answer
- DWater quality monitoring stations situated downstream from the artificial gravel beds recorded dissolved oxygen and temperature readings well within optimal survival parameters for adult salmon throughout the three-year period.
- EAdult salmon returning to the river system showed an overwhelming behavioral preference for laying their eggs in the artificial gravel beds over surviving natural gravel patches.