Read the following passage carefully.
During the late twelfth century, the English legal system underwent a structural transformation regarding land tenure that fundamentally rewired agrarian economics. The crown's promulgation of the Assize of Novel Disseisin ostensibly aimed to protect freeholders from arbitrary dispossession. However, by centralizing the adjudication of land disputes at the royal courts, the Assize inadvertently fostered a chilling effect on secondary agricultural markets. Specifically, this jurisdictional shift deterred the prevalent practice of subinfeudation—wherein tenants granted portions of their land to sub-tenants—because lords feared losing oversight of disputed secondary claims to the crown. Consequently, smaller landholders found themselves unable to legally partition their land without incurring exorbitant royal fees. This financial bottleneck explicitly caused a widespread abandonment of crop diversification; peasants reverted to subsistence mono-cropping to ensure the predictable, immediate returns necessary to satisfy inflexible feudal dues.
Simultaneously, the later enactment of the Statute of Quia Emptores explicitly abolished subinfeudation entirely, substituting it with direct substitution. While intended by the magnates to halt the depreciation of their feudal incidents, its explicit consequence for the peasantry was the rapid agglomeration of estates. Because new tenants could only replace old ones rather than form new sub-tiers, marginal lands were systematically absorbed by wealthier freemen, precipitating a stark decline in the demographic of independent peasant proprietors. Furthermore, the crown's strict enforcement of Mortmain statutes—designed to prevent land from passing into the perpetual, untaxable ownership of the Church—diverted aristocratic wealth that would have otherwise funded localized ecclesiastical endowments into the financing of royal military campaigns, fundamentally altering the trajectory of rural economic development.
Based on the text above, match each historical legal or economic condition with its explicitly stated consequence.
- The jurisdictional shift of land dispute adjudication to royal courtsThe reluctance of landholders to establish new sub-tenant relationships
- The imposition of exorbitant royal fees for legally partitioning propertyThe transition toward predictable, immediate-yield agricultural practices
- The statutory mandate substituting subinfeudation with direct substitutionThe systematic acquisition of marginal estates by affluent freemen
- The legislative restriction on transferring property to untaxable ecclesiastical entitiesThe channeling of noble financial resources toward the state's military endeavors