Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardRole in Argument

Sociologist: Proponents of grid-connected municipal microgrids contend that decentralizing power generation will inevitably insulate residential neighborhoods from cascading blackout events. However, this assertion overlooks the fact that localized battery storage systems rely on centralized dispatch protocols to balance transient frequency surges. Because these synchronization protocols are themselves managed through the overarching regional communications infrastructure, localized grid islands cannot sustain autonomous frequency stability during wide-area network outages. Thus, the claim that municipal microgrids guarantee uninterrupted domestic power during regional catastrophic failures is mistaken.

The statement that localized grid islands cannot sustain autonomous frequency stability during wide-area network outages plays which one of the following roles in the sociologist's argument?

  1. A
    It is an unargued premise cited to establish that battery storage systems require centralized synchronization.
  2. It is a subsidiary conclusion used to provide direct support for the author's primary conclusion.Answer
  3. C
    It is the overall conclusion of the argument against which the microgrid proponents' claims are weighed.
  4. D
    It expresses a position advanced by proponents of microgrids that the author attempts to undermine.
  5. E
    It provides contextual background that illustrates why regional communications infrastructure is vulnerable to cascading failures.

Answer

The statement is a subsidiary conclusion used to provide direct support for the author's primary conclusion.
The correct answer accurately captures the dual structural role of the targeted sentence. The sentence is derived from the factual evidence regarding how dispatch synchronization depends on regional communications infrastructure, making it a conclusion. At the same time, it provides the evidentiary basis for the argument's final sentence, which refutes the proponents' assertion, making it a subsidiary (intermediate) conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Isolate the overall conclusion and determine the author's main objective.
The main conclusion is the final sentence: 'Thus, the claim that municipal microgrids guarantee uninterrupted domestic power during regional catastrophic failures is mistaken.'
Identifying the author's final takeaway establishes the ultimate destination of the argument.
2
Analyze the relationship between the target claim and the sentences immediately preceding it.
The target claim ('localized grid islands cannot sustain autonomous frequency stability...') is directly preceded by the causal premise marker 'Because these synchronization protocols are themselves managed through the overarching regional communications infrastructure...'
Because the target claim receives logical support from another stated fact, it functions as a conclusion rather than a basic, unargued premise.
3
Analyze how the target claim interacts with the main conclusion.
The inability to sustain autonomous frequency stability is the exact reason why the claim of guaranteed uninterrupted domestic power is mistaken.
Since the claim is both supported by prior premises and used to support the final conclusion, its functional role is that of an intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion.

Key Concept

Distinguishing Intermediate (Subsidiary) Conclusions from Basic Premises and Main Conclusions
Estimated Time:1m 20s
Rate this question

Topics

Role in Argument

More questions from this topic