Question

Difficulty: MediumPercentages vs. Numbers Flaws

Match each of the following flawed arguments to the abstract description that most accurately identifies its reasoning error concerning percentages and absolute numbers.

  • Bicycle thefts accounted for 15% of all reported property crimes in the city this year, up from 5% a decade ago. Therefore, there are more bicycle thefts now than there were ten years ago.Takes an increase in a relative proportion to be sufficient evidence that an absolute quantity has grown.
  • Hospital Alpha treated 400 patients for respiratory illness this month, while Hospital Beta treated only 80. Thus, a patient at Hospital Alpha is more likely to be treated for a respiratory illness than a patient at Hospital Beta.Infers a higher comparative rate based solely on a larger absolute number.
  • Zeta Tech's share of the global smartphone market fell from 30% to 20% over the last three years. This shows that Zeta Tech is manufacturing fewer smartphones than it did three years ago.Presumes, without providing justification, that a decrease in a share of a whole must correspond to a decrease in absolute numbers.
  • The city's public library received a record 10,000 new book donations this year. Consequently, donated books must represent a larger percentage of the library's total acquisitions this year than in previous years.Concludes that a relative proportion has grown merely because the absolute amount has reached a record high.

Answer

The bicycle theft argument pairs with the proportion-to-quantity increase flaw; the hospital argument pairs with the quantity-to-rate flaw; the smartphone argument pairs with the share-to-quantity decrease flaw; the library argument pairs with the quantity-to-proportion increase flaw.
Each argument represents one of four directional variations of the percentage vs. number flaw. By precisely identifying whether the premise offers absolute data or proportional data, and whether the conclusion claims an absolute result or a proportional result, you can map each argument to its abstract description.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the premise and conclusion of the first argument.
Premise: Proportion increased (5% to 15%). Conclusion: Absolute number increased.
Identifying the shift from a relative metric to an absolute metric isolates the specific percentage-to-number flaw.
2
Analyze the premise and conclusion of the second argument.
Premise: Absolute number is higher (400 vs 80). Conclusion: Likelihood (rate) is higher.
This reveals the inverse flaw: moving improperly from an absolute count to a comparative proportion.
3
Analyze the premise and conclusion of the third argument.
Premise: Market share (proportion) decreased. Conclusion: Absolute number decreased.
This mirrors the first flaw but tests the downward trajectory, confusing a shrinking slice of the pie with a shrinking absolute size of the slice.
4
Analyze the premise and conclusion of the fourth argument.
Premise: Absolute number is at a record high. Conclusion: Percentage must be larger.
This confirms the final mapping, showing an improper leap from a high quantity to a high relative percentage.

Key Concept

Percentages vs. Numbers Flaws
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question