Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying Main Conclusions

The responsibility for funding wetland restoration must be transferred to state governments. Restoring these vital ecosystems demands substantial capital investment. Local municipalities, which have historically managed these environmental projects, are currently burdened with severe budget deficits. Consequently, local governments are entirely incapable of financing these conservation efforts independently.

Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?

  1. State governments should assume the financial responsibility for restoring wetlands.Answer
  2. B
    Local governments lack the financial resources to independently fund wetland conservation efforts.
  3. C
    Local municipalities have historically been tasked with managing environmental restoration projects.
  4. D
    Wetland ecosystems cannot be saved unless substantial capital investments are made immediately.
  5. E
    State governments are the only entities capable of resolving the severe budget deficits faced by local municipalities.

Answer

The main conclusion of the argument is that state governments should assume the financial responsibility for restoring wetlands.
The argument's primary purpose is to advocate for a shift in funding responsibility to the state level. The very first sentence makes this claim, and all subsequent sentences serve to support it by explaining why local municipalities can no longer bear the cost. The correct answer choice is a direct paraphrase of this opening sentence.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument to separate premises from conclusions.
The argument contains statements about capital requirements and budget deficits (premises), a statement that local governments cannot finance the efforts (intermediate conclusion), and a statement that state governments must take over funding (main conclusion).
Identifying the structural role of each sentence is necessary to find the ultimate point the author is trying to prove.
2
Identify the relationships between the claims.
The premises regarding high costs and deficits support the claim that local governments cannot pay for the restoration. In turn, the inability of local governments to pay supports the claim that state governments must take over the responsibility.
Tracking the flow of logical support reveals which statement is the ultimate conclusion.
3
Locate the statement that receives support from the rest of the argument but supports no other statement.
The very first sentence ('The responsibility for funding wetland restoration must be transferred to state governments') is the main conclusion.
The main conclusion is the endpoint of the argument's reasoning chain.
4
Match the identified main conclusion to the answer choices.
The correct option is the one that accurately paraphrases the first sentence of the stimulus.
The correct answer must precisely capture the meaning of the main conclusion without altering its scope or certainty.

Key Concept

Identifying Main Conclusions
Rate this question

Topics

Identifying Main Conclusions

More questions from this topic