Match each normative principle with the specific factual scenario that best illustrates its application.
- An action is morally acceptable if its primary intent is to help others, even if it violates a minor administrative rule.A receptionist ignores a strict office policy against personal visitors to allow a lost, crying child to wait inside the lobby until police arrive.
- A business must prioritize the physical safety of its employees over the maximization of short-term financial gains.A factory manager halts the production line to repair a malfunctioning ventilation system, deliberately missing a major deadline and losing a lucrative contract.
- Individuals are morally responsible for harm they cause only if they could have reasonably foreseen that harm.A construction worker who accidentally drops a wrench that bounces off a passing truck and shatters a window two blocks away is not held liable because the trajectory was entirely unpredictable.
- One is obligated to keep a promise unless fulfilling it would result in severe physical injury.A contractor backs out of a binding agreement to renovate a house because a newly discovered structural flaw means continuing the work would risk a roof collapse.
Answer
Principle 1 matches the receptionist helping a child; Principle 2 matches the manager repairing ventilation; Principle 3 matches the worker dropping the wrench; Principle 4 matches the contractor avoiding a roof collapse.
Each correct pairing links a generalized normative rule to a specific factual scenario that explicitly fulfills all the conditions of that rule. The manager sacrifices profit for safety; the contractor breaks a promise to avoid injury; the receptionist breaks a rule to help a child; and the worker is excused from liability because the harm was unforeseeable.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Applying broad normative and conditional principles to specific factual situations by identifying matching necessary and sufficient conditions.
Estimated Time:1m 30s