Until the early twentieth century, historical linguists widely held that the division between the 'centum' and 'satem' branches of the Indo-European language family corresponded to a strict geographical divide, with centum languages situated exclusively in the west (Europe) and satem languages in the east (Asia). This geographic paradigm was overturned by the discovery and decipherment of Tocharian manuscripts in the Tarim Basin of western China. Tocharian was unambiguously identified as a centum language, demonstrating that velar stop consonants had been preserved as stops rather than undergoing the palatalization characteristic of satem languages. Because Tocharian existed thousands of miles east of all other known centum languages, scholars initially hypothesized that speakers of Tocharian had migrated eastward after the centum-satem divergence occurred. However, subsequent morphological analyses revealed that Tocharian lacks certain nominal innovations shared by all other eastern Indo-European branches, while preserving archaic grammatical features found elsewhere only in Anatolian languages.
Based on the passage, which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the text?
- The eastern geographic distribution of an Indo-European language does not establish that the language underwent the consonant palatalization typical of satem languages.Answer
- BTocharian speakers must have migrated to the Tarim Basin before any satem-speaking populations migrated into Asia.
- CAnatolian languages were originally spoken primarily in Central Asia before spreading westward into the Mediterranean.
- DThe nominal innovations present in eastern Indo-European branches directly caused the phonological shift from velar stops to palatal consonants.
- ELinguists have determined that satem languages represent an earlier stage of Indo-European development than centum languages.