Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardAppeal Fallacies (Authority, Emotion, Majority)

Historian: Academic consensus holds that the Valerian Empire’s collapse was primarily driven by economic instability. This view is demonstrably false. The celebrated poet Callimachus, who lived during the empire's final days, wrote extensively that the empire crumbled solely because of the moral decay of its ruling class. Furthermore, when polled recently, an overwhelming majority of citizens identified political corruption, not economics, as the true cause of the empire's fall. Therefore, we must conclude that the Valerian Empire fell due to political and moral failure, not economic factors.

Which of the following most accurately describes a flaw in the historian's reasoning?

  1. A
    It relies on an illicit shift in the meaning of the word 'collapse' from an economic downfall to a political dismantling.
  2. B
    It fails to adequately distinguish between the intermediate conclusion that the academic consensus is false and the main conclusion regarding the actual cause of the collapse.
  3. It bases a historical conclusion on the testimony of a source lacking specialized expertise and on the widespread beliefs of non-experts.Answer
  4. D
    It concludes that political corruption caused the empire's collapse solely from evidence that corruption coincided with the empire's final years.
  5. E
    It depends on the unsupported assumption that modern historians are motivated to suppress evidence of moral decay to protect their established theories.

Answer

The option stating that it bases a historical conclusion on the testimony of a source lacking specialized expertise and on the widespread beliefs of non-experts.
The correct answer accurately identifies the two distinct appeal fallacies committed in the stimulus. First, the historian appeals to the authority of Callimachus, a poet. While he lived through the era, a poet inherently lacks the specialized historical and macroeconomic expertise required to definitively determine the structural causes of an empire's collapse (Appeal to Unqualified Authority). Second, the historian relies on a modern public opinion poll to establish a historical fact, wrongly equating popular belief with empirical truth (Appeal to Majority/Popular Opinion).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the historian's argument to identify the premises and the main conclusion.
The main conclusion is that the Valerian Empire fell due to political and moral failure. The premises supporting this are the writings of Callimachus (a poet) and a recent poll of citizens.
Isolating the core argument is necessary to evaluate the logical relationship between the evidence provided and the final claim.
2
Evaluate the logical validity of the premises used to support the causal conclusion.
The argument uses a poet to refute an established macroeconomic historical consensus, and it uses a modern public opinion poll to establish an objective historical fact.
Identifying the nature of the evidence reveals whether the author is relying on sound reasoning or employing logical fallacies.
3
Categorize the specific logical flaws present in the use of this evidence.
Relying on a poet for historical causation is an Appeal to Unqualified Authority. Relying on a public poll for factual truth is an Appeal to Majority (Ad Populum).
Recognizing the exact flaw types allows for precise matching with the abstract descriptions in the answer choices.
4
Evaluate the answer choices to find the one that accurately describes the identified appeal fallacies.
The correct choice explicitly describes basing a conclusion on a source lacking specialized expertise (the poet) and the widespread beliefs of non-experts (the polled citizens).
The correct answer on a Flaw question must accurately describe what actually happens in the stimulus and represent a genuine logical error.

Key Concept

Appeal Fallacies (Authority and Majority)
Rate this question

Topics

Appeal Fallacies (Authority, Emotion, Majority)

More questions from this topic