Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardFunction of Detail in Context

Legal scholars often characterize the Second Circuit’s *Computer Associates v. Altai* decision as a fatal blow to copyright protection for software architecture. In establishing the abstraction-filtration-comparison test, *Altai* mandates that courts dissect a program and "filter out" elements dictated by efficiency or external hardware constraints before comparing the remainder to the allegedly infringing work. Detractors argue that this rigorous filtration inevitably atomizes a program, systematically blinding courts to the creative synthesis required to assemble standard, unprotectable routines into a complex operational whole. This objection, however, rests on a conflation of the test's analytic mechanics with its jurisdictional reach. *Altai’s* filtration framework governs only the infringement analysis of non-literal elements as discrete entities; it expressly preserves traditional "compilation" copyright, under which the specific selection and arrangement of otherwise unprotectable elements retains statutory protection. Thus, the requirement to isolate unprotected elements does not implicitly sanction the wholesale appropriation of architectural design, but rather forces plaintiffs to articulate the exact locus of their originality rather than relying on a program's monolithic complexity.

Which of the following best describes the primary function of the author's reference to "traditional 'compilation' copyright" in the passage?

  1. demonstrate that a legal mechanism remains available to protect the very architectural features that detractors claim the *Altai* decision leaves vulnerableAnswer
  2. B
    define the specific statutory category that courts use when analyzing the selection and arrangement of unprotectable software routines
  3. C
    concede to the detractors that the abstraction-filtration-comparison test is inadequate for protecting the creative synthesis of standard routines
  4. D
    suggest that software developers should rely exclusively on compilation claims rather than the abstraction-filtration-comparison test to protect their work
  5. E
    prove that the abstraction-filtration-comparison test governs only the literal elements of a program and has no bearing on non-literal components

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the reference is used to demonstrate that a legal mechanism remains available to protect the very architectural features that detractors claim the *Altai* decision leaves vulnerable.
The correct answer accurately captures the argumentative structure of the final paragraph. The detractors argue that the *Altai* decision destroys protection for the 'creative synthesis' of a program. The author counters this by pointing out a flaw in their understanding of the test's jurisdiction, specifically invoking 'compilation copyright' to prove that the legal system still protects the 'selection and arrangement' (i.e., the creative synthesis) of those elements. Thus, the detail functions as evidence to invalidate the detractors' primary concern.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the question stem to identify the target detail and the required task.
The target detail is 'traditional "compilation" copyright', and the task is to determine its rhetorical primary function in the context of the passage.
Accurately pinpointing the detail and understanding that the question asks for 'function' (why it is there) rather than 'content' (what it means) is essential for avoiding trap answers.
2
Locate the target detail in the text and analyze its immediate structural context.
The detail appears in the sentence: 'it expressly preserves traditional "compilation" copyright...' This sentence directly follows a claim that the detractors' objection 'rests on a conflation of the test's analytic mechanics with its jurisdictional reach.'
The surrounding sentences establish the argumentative framework. Here, the author is actively transitioning from outlining a criticism to refuting it.
3
Determine the logical relationship between the target detail and the author's central thesis.
The author uses the existence of compilation copyright (which protects the arrangement of unprotectable elements) as concrete evidence that the *Altai* test does not destroy architectural protection, thereby neutralizing the detractors' main criticism.
Understanding how the specific piece of evidence dismantles the opposing viewpoint reveals the ultimate rhetorical purpose of the phrase.
4
Evaluate the options against this established function, carefully filtering out distractors that describe content instead of function.
The correct option captures the refutational nature of the detail. Options that merely define the term, assume a concession, or contradict the text's explicit statements are eliminated.
Distractors in high-difficulty questions often present factually true statements from the passage that do not answer the specific question asked.

Key Concept

Function of Detail in Context (Refuting a Premise)
Rate this question

Topics

Function of Detail in Context

More questions from this topic