Read the following two passages regarding moral psychology.
Passage A
The long-held consensus in moral philosophy has been that ethical judgments are fundamentally products of rational deliberation. When a person encounters a moral dilemma, they evaluate the circumstances against universal principles, employing logic to determine the appropriate course of action. It is certainly true that strong feelings often accompany moral judgments—one might feel disgust at a cruel act or satisfaction upon witnessing justice served. However, these affective responses are consequences, rather than causes, of the cognitive evaluation. To claim otherwise is to reduce the complex architecture of human morality to mere biological reflexes, stripping moral decisions of their normative weight.
Passage B
Recent advancements in cognitive science have forced a radical reassessment of how moral judgments are formed. The traditional view—that humans operate as detached rational agents deducing ethical truths—is largely a fiction. Empirical evidence demonstrates that moral decisions are overwhelmingly driven by immediate, intuitive emotional responses. When faced with a moral violation, the feeling of condemnation arises instantaneously, before any conscious reasoning can occur. What we traditionally call 'moral reasoning' is typically just a post-hoc rationalization, a cognitive mechanism designed to justify an emotional reaction that has already dictated the judgment. Reason is not the master of our moral lives, but the servant of our moral sentiments.
Statement: Based on the passages, the authors would disagree over whether individuals actually experience strong emotional reactions when confronting moral dilemmas.
Answer: Answer