Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumRole in Argument

Urban Planner: Many historical preservationists argue that converting decommissioned industrial waterfronts into commercial retail zones destroys their cultural value. However, this view fails to recognize that preserving the physical structures of these warehouses requires substantial recurring maintenance funds. Since private retail developers are required to finance structural restoration and maintain historical facades as a condition of their leases, allowing commercial redevelopment actually safeguards the physical heritage of the waterfront. Thus, permitting retail adaptation is often the most effective means of historical preservation.

Which of the following most accurately describes the role played in the urban planner's argument by the claim that allowing commercial redevelopment actually safeguards the physical heritage of the waterfront?

  1. A
    It is the overall conclusion that the argument is structured to establish.
  2. B
    It is an unargued factual premise introduced to explain why preservationists object to commercial development.
  3. It is an intermediate conclusion that is supported by evidence about lease requirements and that in turn supports the main conclusion.Answer
  4. D
    It is a concession made to historical preservationists that qualifies the planner's overall recommendation.
  5. E
    It is a potential counterexample presented to undermine the claim that maintenance requires substantial funding.

Answer

The statement acts as an intermediate conclusion supported by evidence regarding developer lease conditions and used to justify the main conclusion.
The targeted statement receives logical justification from the preceding premise regarding lease conditions ('Since private retail developers are required...') and simultaneously serves as the premise that justifies the ultimate conclusion introduced by 'Thus'. Therefore, it functions precisely as an intermediate or subsidiary conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structural components of the stimulus
Identified the opposing viewpoint (redevelopment destroys cultural value), basic premises (preservation requires funding; developers are obligated to fund restoration/facades), an intermediate claim (redevelopment safeguards physical heritage), and the final conclusion (permitting retail adaptation is often the most effective preservation method).
Deconstructing the argument into premises, subsidiary conclusions, and the main conclusion is necessary to establish the exact functional role of the targeted sentence.
2
Determine what supports the targeted claim and what the targeted claim supports
The clause introduced by 'Since' provides evidence directly supporting the targeted claim, and the targeted claim in turn leads directly to the final conclusion signaled by 'Thus'.
A claim that receives logical support from explicit evidence and provides logical support to the final conclusion functions as an intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion.
3
Match the functional role to the answer choices
The correct description states that the claim is an intermediate conclusion supported by evidence about lease requirements and used to support the main conclusion.
This precisely matches the two-way relationship of an intermediate conclusion in multi-step reasoning.

Key Concept

Identifying intermediate (subsidiary) conclusions in multi-layered logical arguments
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Rate this question

Topics

Role in Argument

More questions from this topic