Question

Difficulty: MediumIdentifying the Apparent Discrepancy

Based on the scenario below, evaluate whether the final statement accurately identifies the apparent discrepancy.

Scenario: A national retail chain recently doubled the hourly wages of its entry-level employees. Corporate management implemented this wage increase with the explicit goal of improving employee retention and reducing annual turnover. Nevertheless, human resources data from the year following the wage increase indicates that the annual employee turnover rate actually increased by 15 percent, even though local unemployment rates and the overall economy remained remarkably stable.

Statement: The genuine logical discrepancy in the information provided is that the retail chain's turnover rate increased despite stable local unemployment rates and overall economic conditions.

Answer: Answer

Answer

False
The statement is False. The true apparent discrepancy lies between the retail chain doubling wages (a policy explicitly intended to reduce turnover) and the turnover rate actually increasing by 15 percent. The stable economic conditions are provided merely as background information to rule out external macroeconomic causes for the turnover increase, not as part of the core paradox.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the unexpected outcome presented in the scenario.
The annual employee turnover rate increased by 15 percent.
A discrepancy must involve an outcome that contradicts expectations based on other provided facts.
2
Identify the premise that creates a conflict with this outcome.
The company doubled hourly wages with the explicit goal of reducing turnover.
This is the premise that makes the increase in turnover genuinely surprising.
3
Evaluate the role of the stable economic conditions mentioned in the statement.
The stable economy is a background fact that rules out an alternative explanation for the turnover, rather than the source of the paradox itself.
To determine if the provided statement correctly isolates the central discrepancy.

Key Concept

Distinguishing the core paradox (the two conflicting sets of facts) from background premises or defender information.
Rate this question