Passage:
In late nineteenth-century linguistics, the Neogrammarian school famously posited that sound change operates according to exceptionless physical laws, asserting that any apparent phonetic inconsistency in language evolution must be attributable either to dialect borrowing or to an undiscovered phonetic condition. Skeptics initially challenged this axiom by citing persistent anomalies in the Germanic consonant shift known as Grimm's Law, wherein certain Proto-Indo-European voiceless stops unexpectedly yielded voiced rather than voiceless fricatives in Germanic daughter languages. This dispute was largely resolved when Karl Verner demonstrated that these anomalous voicings occurred strictly when the ancestral pitch accent did not immediately precede the consonant in question. By showing that the anomaly was governed by a rigorous suprasegmental rule, Verner transformed what had seemed a fundamental counterexample into compelling corroboration of phonetic regularity.
Which of the following most accurately describes the primary function of the author's reference to the 'ancestral pitch accent'?
- Aillustrate how historical linguists reconstructed the suprasegmental pitch system of Proto-Indo-European
- Bprovide evidence that nineteenth-century skeptics were justified in rejecting the Neogrammarian hypothesis
- identify the conditioning factor that resolved an apparent contradiction to the principle of regular sound changeAnswer
- Dchallenge the premise that sound laws operate according to predictable physical mechanisms
- Edistinguish between sound changes caused by dialect borrowing and those caused by environmental phonetic factors