Question

Difficulty: EasyStrengthen

Agronomists observed that blueberry plots treated with crushed pecan shell mulch produced 25 percent higher fruit yields than untreated bare soil plots. The agronomists concluded that nutrients released into the soil by decomposing pecan shells caused the increase in yield.

True or False: The finding that blueberry plots covered with an inert synthetic ground cover—which provides identical moisture retention and weed suppression to pecan shells but releases zero nutrients—produced yields no higher than untreated bare soil plots strengthens the agronomists' argument.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True
The claim is evaluated as True because the supplementary finding functions as a negative control. By showing that the yield gain does not occur under identical non-nutritive physical conditions, the finding eliminates moisture retention and weed suppression as alternate causes, directly boosting the plausibility of the nutrient-based explanation.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises in the argument.
Premise: Blueberry plots with pecan shell mulch yielded 25% more fruit than bare soil. Conclusion: Nutrients from decomposing pecan shells caused the yield increase.
Clarifying the core claim isolates the exact causal relationship that must be supported.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and potential alternative explanations.
The argument assumes that non-nutritional properties of the mulch (such as weed control or moisture retention) were not the true causes of the increased yield.
Causal arguments on the LSAT are vulnerable to alternate causes; eliminating an alternate cause strengthens the conclusion.
3
Evaluate the impact of the supplementary statement.
The statement acts as a control test showing that when physical benefits are present without nutrients, yield does not increase.
Eliminating alternative mechanisms validates the author's proposed causal factor, confirming that the statement strengthens the argument.

Key Concept

Strengthening a causal conclusion by ruling out alternative explanations through a control condition
Estimated Time:45s
Rate this question