Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumMost Strongly Supported Questions

When traditional hierarchical corporations transition to a "flat" organizational structure, they typically experience a short-term decrease in overall productivity. However, companies that implement comprehensive peer-review systems alongside the flat structure see their productivity return to pre-transition levels within six months. Companies that transition to a flat structure without implementing peer-review systems consistently report productivity levels below their pre-transition baseline even after two years. A recent industry report found that the majority of companies transitioning to a flat structure do not implement comprehensive peer-review systems. Which of the following statements are most strongly supported by the information above? (Select all that apply.)

  1. Most companies that transition to a flat organizational structure will have productivity levels below their pre-transition baseline two years after the transition.Answer
  2. A flat organizational structure is not sufficient on its own to ensure a company maintains its pre-transition productivity levels in the long term.Answer
  3. C
    Any company that implements a comprehensive peer-review system will see its productivity return to pre-transition levels within six months.
  4. D
    If a company's productivity returns to pre-transition levels within six months of an organizational change, that company must have implemented a flat structure with a peer-review system.
  5. E
    The short-term decrease in productivity following a transition to a flat structure is primarily caused by employees' initial resistance to new peer-review systems.

Answer

The correct statements are that most companies transitioning to a flat structure will remain below baseline productivity after two years, and that a flat structure alone is insufficient to maintain long-term productivity.
The correct choices are directly provable by combining the provided premises. Since the majority of transitioning companies do not use peer-review systems, and companies without these systems remain below baseline productivity after two years, it is strongly supported that most transitioning companies will be below baseline after two years. Furthermore, because a flat structure without a peer-review system results in long-term productivity deficits, the flat structure alone is demonstrably insufficient to maintain baseline productivity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the premises provided in the stimulus.
Premise 1: Flat transition causes a short-term productivity drop. Premise 2: Flat transition + peer review leads to baseline recovery within 6 months. Premise 3: Flat transition + NO peer review leads to sub-baseline productivity even after 2 years. Premise 4: The majority of flat transitions occur without peer review.
Breaking down the stimulus into discrete logical facts is necessary to identify how they interact.
2
Synthesize the premises regarding the majority of companies.
Since the majority do not implement peer reviews (Premise 4), and those without peer reviews stay below baseline after two years (Premise 3), it logically follows that the majority of transitioning companies stay below baseline after two years.
To determine what can be most strongly inferred about the largest group mentioned in the text.
3
Evaluate the sufficiency of the organizational change.
Because implementing a flat structure without peer review leads to long-term productivity loss (Premise 3), the flat structure by itself is not enough to maintain prior productivity.
To test inferences regarding the inherent effectiveness of the flat structure alone.
4
Evaluate the incorrect options against the established facts.
The remaining options incorrectly assume conditional reversals, exaggerate the scope of the premises (applying them to 'any' company), or invent unsupported causal explanations.
To eliminate choices that fall into common logical traps on inference questions.

Key Concept

Synthesizing multiple premises to derive strongly supported inferences while avoiding extreme claims, conditional fallacies, and outside information.
Rate this question

Topics

Most Strongly Supported Questions

More questions from this topic