Examkin

Question

Difficulty: MediumContextual Examples

The following excerpt discusses archaeological perspectives on ancient structures.

For decades, archaeologists analyzing the monumental stone enclosures of the Neolithic period assumed these structures were constructed by hierarchical societies to serve as exclusive religious centers for an elite priesthood. Recent scholarship, however, challenges this top-down view, suggesting instead that these sites acted as vital social hubs for decentralized, egalitarian hunter-gatherer groups. Because these groups were highly mobile and widely dispersed, periodic gatherings were essential for maintaining genetic diversity and sharing technological innovations. The massive communal feasts evidenced by the isotopic analysis of animal bones at Durrington Walls, for example, required coordinated logistics that brought together bands from hundreds of miles away. Such monumental undertakings were not merely acts of religious devotion, but crucial mechanisms for forging political alliances and mitigating the risks of resource scarcity in unpredictable environments.

Which of the following best describes the author's primary purpose in mentioning the 'isotopic analysis of animal bones at Durrington Walls'?

  1. A
    To identify a specific technological innovation that was frequently shared during periodic Neolithic gatherings.
  2. B
    To provide data that definitively refutes the theory that Neolithic monuments were constructed for religious purposes.
  3. To offer concrete evidence demonstrating how monumental sites facilitated the convergence of widely scattered populations.Answer
  4. D
    To illustrate how centralized hierarchies managed the logistics of large-scale events to prevent resource scarcity.
  5. E
    To highlight an analytical methodology that has become essential for tracking the dietary habits of ancient nomadic populations.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the purpose is to offer concrete evidence demonstrating how monumental sites facilitated the convergence of widely scattered populations.
The correct answer accurately captures the author's rhetorical intent. The isotopic analysis, which shows that animals were brought from 'hundreds of miles away,' is introduced specifically to provide physical evidence supporting the preceding claim that these monumental sites functioned as vital social hubs for 'widely dispersed' nomadic bands.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the broader claim made immediately preceding the mentioned example.
The preceding sentences argue that the monumental sites acted as vital social hubs for decentralized, highly mobile, and widely dispersed hunter-gatherer groups.
Contextual examples in LSAT Reading Comprehension are typically introduced to support or illustrate the claim made immediately before them.
2
Examine the specific details provided within the example itself.
The example details how isotopic analysis of bones reveals that massive communal feasts required coordinated logistics, bringing 'bands from hundreds of miles away.'
Understanding the specific mechanics of the example reveals exactly how it operates within the author's argument.
3
Synthesize the example's details with the preceding claim to determine its rhetorical function.
The evidence of bringing livestock from great distances acts as physical proof that these monumental sites successfully drew together geographically dispersed populations for social gatherings.
This synthesis maps directly to the correct answer choice, confirming why the author chose to include this specific detail.

Key Concept

Identifying the rhetorical and illustrative function of specific details in supporting a passage's broader argument.
Rate this question

Topics

Contextual Examples

More questions from this topic