Question

Difficulty: Very hardStrengthen

Consider the following argument:

Media Scholar: It is widely argued that the mass production of political pamphlets was the primary catalyst for the rapid spread of democratic ideals among the European working class during the 18th century. However, historical records confirm that the literacy rate among this demographic at the time remained firmly below 15 percent. Since the vast majority of these individuals could not read, the diffusion of these revolutionary ideals must have been driven almost entirely by traditional oral communication in public gathering places, functioning completely independent of the printed word.

The media scholar's argument is logically strengthened by newly uncovered historical accounts indicating that 18th-century political pamphlets were regularly read aloud by literate community members to large audiences of illiterate workers in local taverns.

Answer: Answer

Answer

False
The statement is False because the historical accounts actually weaken the media scholar's argument. The scholar concludes that the spread of ideals functioned 'completely independent of the printed word.' However, the accounts reveal that the oral communication was, in fact, directly reliant on the printed pamphlets. This undermines the scholar's attempt to sever the causal link between the mass production of pamphlets and the spread of democratic ideals.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the media scholar's argument.
The conclusion is that the diffusion of democratic ideals was driven by oral communication and functioned completely independent of the printed word.
Understanding the exact scope of the conclusion is necessary to determine what evidence would strengthen or weaken it.
2
Analyze the new evidence provided in the statement.
The evidence states that printed political pamphlets were read aloud to illiterate workers by literate community members.
We must determine how this specific piece of information interacts with the established premises and conclusion.
3
Evaluate the logical impact of the new evidence on the argument.
While the evidence confirms an oral medium was used, it establishes that this oral communication was directly dependent on the printed pamphlets. This contradicts the 'completely independent of the printed word' clause of the conclusion.
Evidence that contradicts a core, explicit component of the conclusion weakens the argument, rather than strengthening it.
4
Determine the truth value of the provided statement.
Since the new evidence weakens the argument, the statement claiming that it strengthens the argument is False.
This directly answers the prompt's evaluation criteria.

Key Concept

Evaluating how new evidence affects an argument by distinguishing between superficial support for a premise and contradiction of a core conclusion.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question