Question

Difficulty: EasyWeaken

Ornithologist: In a behavioral study, captive migratory songbirds placed inside an indoor planetarium failed to orient toward their southward route whenever the artificial night sky was darkened. This demonstrates that these songbirds rely exclusively on celestial patterns rather than geomagnetic fields to determine their migratory direction.

The claim that the planetarium testing room was encased in thick metal shielding that completely blocked Earth's ambient geomagnetic field, if true, weakens the ornithologist's argument.

Answer: Answer

Answer

True. The supplementary statement introduces an alternative explanation that undermines the author's conclusion.
The statement is true because the presence of magnetic shielding invalidates the premise that geomagnetic cues were available as a backup. Because the birds were deprived of all navigation cues when the lights went out, their failure to orient does not demonstrate that they cannot use geomagnetic fields under normal conditions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the author's premise and conclusion.
Premise: Songbirds failed to orient when visual star patterns were removed. Conclusion: Songbirds rely exclusively on stars and do not use geomagnetic fields.
Isolating the core reasoning step is necessary to determine what assumption the author relies upon.
2
Evaluate the logical effect of the new information.
If the testing facility blocked Earth's geomagnetic field, the birds lacked access to magnetic cues throughout the experiment. Their inability to navigate in the dark was therefore due to having neither visual nor magnetic cues available.
Revealing that the experimental environment eliminated the alternative navigational system directly challenges the inference that the birds lack magnetic navigational capabilities.

Key Concept

Weakening a causal conclusion by identifying an unaddressed experimental confound or alternative explanation.
Rate this question

Topics