If the proposed highway expansion is approved, the adjacent wetlands will be drained. The wetlands will be drained only if the local wildlife council's objections are overruled. Furthermore, any drainage of the wetlands will result in a decline in the migratory bird population, and a decline in this population always leads to a drop in eco-tourism revenue.
Which one of the following statements must be true based on the information above?
- AIf local eco-tourism revenue drops, then the proposed highway expansion must have been approved.
- BIf the proposed highway expansion is not approved, then local eco-tourism revenue will not drop.
- If local eco-tourism revenue does not drop, then the proposed highway expansion was not approved.Answer
- DIf the local wildlife council's objections are overruled, the migratory bird population will decline.
- EThe local wildlife council's objections are motivated by a desire to protect eco-tourism revenue.
Answer
If local eco-tourism revenue does not drop, then the proposed highway expansion was not approved.
The stimulus establishes a direct sequence of conditional statements: Highway Approved -> Wetlands Drained -> Bird Decline -> Revenue Drop. The valid contrapositive of this entire sequence is: No Revenue Drop -> Highway Not Approved. The correct answer precisely states this logically guaranteed outcome.
Step-by-Step Solution
Key Concept
Chaining Conditional Statements