Strengthen

49 questions

Question 41Question →

Match each logical argument (left) with the specific piece of evidence (right) that most powerfully strengthens its conclusion by resolving its core structural vulnerability.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

An analysis revealed that companies allowing remote work saw a 15% increase in output per employee. Thus, working from home eliminates office distractions and directly boosts individual efficiency.
Immediately after the government lowered the capital gains tax, foreign investment in domestic tech startups doubled. Therefore, the tax cut successfully incentivized international investors.
Because fragments of a rare meteor were found alongside fossilized dinosaur bones in the crater, the meteor impact must have been the direct cause of the sudden extinction in this region.
To combat urban heat islands, our city should mandate white reflective roofs, just as the city of Solaris did ten years ago to dramatically lower its ambient temperatures.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct pairings are: Remote work (Left 1) with Time-tracking logs (Right 2); Tax cut (Left 2) with Global downturn (Right 3); Meteor impact (Left 3) with Radiometric dating (Right 4); and Urban heat roofs (Left 4) with Meteorological data (Right 1).
Each correct pairing directly addresses the unstated assumption in the argument. Left 1 is strengthened by Right 2 because it eliminates the alternative that productivity rose due to longer hours. Left 2 is strengthened by Right 3 because it eliminates the alternative of a global market boom. Left 3 is strengthened by Right 4 by proving the timeline supports causality. Left 4 is strengthened by Right 1 because it validates the analogy between the two cities.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze each argument to identify its conclusion and its underlying vulnerability (e.g., alternative causes, weak analogies).
Identified four distinct gaps: alternate cause for productivity, alternate cause for investment, temporal/causal gap in extinction, and relevance gap in the city analogy.
Understanding the specific flaw in an argument is necessary before one can identify the evidence that repairs it.
2
Evaluate the available evidence statements on the right to see which logically seals a corresponding gap.
Matched each evidence statement to an argument based on how it defends against a vulnerability (e.g., ruling out increased work hours to support efficiency).
Strengthening an argument often involves eliminating alternative explanations or confirming the validity of a comparison.

Key Concept

Identifying and resolving structural vulnerabilities in causal and analogical reasoning.
Question 42Question →

Match each logical argument with the specific piece of additional evidence that would most strongly support its conclusion by addressing its underlying logical vulnerability.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Office workers using the new 'AeroType' ergonomic keyboard reported significantly less wrist fatigue over a one-month period than workers using standard keyboards. Thus, the AeroType keyboard effectively reduces typing strain.
In a recent poll conducted entirely within the downtown financial district, 75% of respondents supported the proposed city-wide transit tax. Therefore, the tax is likely to have broad support among all registered city voters.
The experimental 'Sun-Glow' tomato variety yielded 40% more fruit than traditional varieties during controlled greenhouse tests. Consequently, local farmers adopting this variety will see massive increases in their actual outdoor harvests.
Accounting firm Alpha saw a 20% increase in employee output after switching to a fully remote work model. Therefore, law firm Beta will also experience a significant productivity boost if it adopts a fully remote model.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Argument 1 matches with the evidence regarding work hours and breaks. Argument 2 matches with the demographic evidence. Argument 3 matches with the greenhouse calibration evidence. Argument 4 matches with the workflow comparison evidence.
Each correct pairing matches an argument with the specific premise that resolves its unique logical vulnerability. Argument 1 requires ruling out alternative causes for reduced fatigue. Argument 2 requires proving the survey sample is representative. Argument 3 requires demonstrating that experimental conditions apply to the real world. Argument 4 requires establishing that the two compared firms are relevantly similar.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze Argument 1 to identify the logical gap.
The argument assumes a causal relationship between the keyboard and reduced fatigue, ignoring potential differences between the two groups of workers.
Finding an alternate cause that is eliminated by the evidence is the standard way to strengthen a causal claim.
2
Analyze Argument 2 to identify the logical gap.
The argument relies on a survey of a specific neighborhood to make a claim about an entire city.
Strengthening a survey-based argument requires demonstrating that the sample is adequately representative of the whole.
3
Analyze Argument 3 to identify the logical gap.
The argument assumes that success in a controlled greenhouse environment will seamlessly translate to outdoor farming.
Strengthening this requires evidence showing the two environments are functionally identical regarding the crop's needs.
4
Analyze Argument 4 to identify the logical gap.
The argument assumes that because a strategy worked for an accounting firm, it will work for a law firm.
Strengthening an argument by analogy requires proving that the two subjects share critical similarities relevant to the conclusion.

Key Concept

Strengthening Arguments by Identifying and Resolving Logical Gaps
Question 43Question →

Ornithologist: In the past few decades, populations of the crested scrub-jay living in urban areas have developed significantly shorter beaks than those living in surrounding rural woodlands. This morphological change is an evolutionary adaptation. Shorter beaks are better suited for scavenging human food scraps from flat surfaces, which are abundant in urban areas, whereas the longer beaks of rural jays are necessary for extracting insects from deep crevices in tree bark.

Which of the following statements, if true, strengthen the ornithologist's argument? (Select all that apply.)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Urban scrub-jays raised in captivity from hatching on a strict diet of tree-dwelling insects still develop shorter beaks than rural scrub-jays.; When presented with identical human food scraps on a flat surface, scrub-jays with shorter beaks consume the food significantly faster than those with longer beaks.

Answer

The correct statements are the one demonstrating that captive urban jays retain short beaks regardless of diet, and the one confirming that shorter beaks provide a consumption speed advantage on flat surfaces.
The ornithologist argues that the shorter beaks in urban scrub-jays are an evolutionary adaptation specifically suited for scavenging human food scraps. To strengthen this causal claim, we must support the mechanism or rule out alternative explanations. The option involving jays raised in captivity strengthens the argument by ruling out environmental plasticity (e.g., that eating from flat surfaces simply wears down the beak), thereby supporting the claim that the change is genetic. The option comparing food consumption speeds directly validates the premise that shorter beaks provide a tangible mechanical advantage for scavenging on flat surfaces.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion and the supporting premises of the argument.
Conclusion: The shorter beaks of urban scrub-jays are an evolutionary adaptation for scavenging human food scraps. Premises: Urban jays have shorter beaks than rural jays; short beaks are better for flat surfaces; long beaks are needed for tree bark.
Understanding the core argument structure is required before evaluating how to strengthen its logic.
2
Analyze the logical gaps or vulnerabilities in the argument.
The argument assumes the change is genetic/evolutionary rather than a physical result of wear and tear (developmental plasticity). It also assumes the theoretical advantage of short beaks actually translates to a practical advantage in acquiring food.
Identifying weaknesses highlights exactly what kind of new information would shore up the argument's plausibility.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the identified gaps.
The statement about captive-raised jays proves the trait is genetic, eliminating the alternative cause of physical wear. The statement about consumption speed proves the practical advantage, validating the proposed mechanism.
Correct answers in a strengthen question must directly address and bridge the logical gaps in the author's reasoning.

Key Concept

Strengthen - Ruling out Alternate Causes and Validating Causal Mechanisms
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 44Question →

Botanist: The rare Moonflower typically blooms only when exposed to a specific ultrasonic frequency produced by the wings of the Silver Moth. However, a thriving population of blooming Moonflowers was recently discovered on a remote island where Silver Moths are completely absent. Clearly, another species of insect on this island must produce this same ultrasonic frequency, thereby triggering the flowers to bloom.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the botanist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: When grown from seed in a silent, controlled laboratory setting, Moonflowers from the remote island will not bloom unless exposed to the specific ultrasonic frequency.

Answer

The option stating that Moonflowers from the island will not bloom in a silent laboratory unless exposed to the specific frequency.
The botanist concludes that another insect species on the island is producing the required ultrasonic frequency. This argument fundamentally relies on the assumption that the island Moonflowers still actually require this frequency to bloom. The correct answer eliminates the alternative explanation that the island population has simply evolved to bloom without any acoustic stimulation. By confirming that the frequency is still biologically necessary for these specific flowers, it strengthens the premise that the frequency must be physically present on the island, thereby bolstering the conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core components of the argument.
Premise: Moonflowers need a specific ultrasonic frequency to bloom, usually from Silver Moths. Premise: Blooming Moonflowers are on an island without Silver Moths. Conclusion: Another insect on the island produces the frequency.
Understanding the structural relationship between premises and conclusion is necessary to evaluate gaps.
2
Identify the logical gap or assumption made by the author.
The author assumes that the Moonflowers on the island still require the ultrasonic frequency to bloom, rather than having adapted to bloom without it.
Arguments often rely on unstated assumptions that, if false, would cause the argument to collapse.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find one that supports this assumption or rules out an alternative explanation.
The correct answer demonstrates that the island Moonflowers still biologically require the frequency, ruling out the alternative that they evolved to no longer need it.
Eliminating a viable alternative explanation (that the plants changed) forces us to accept that the frequency is present, strengthening the claim that a new insect is providing it.

Key Concept

Ruling Out Alternative Explanations (Defender Assumption)
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 45Question →

Evaluate the flawed causal claims, predictions, and historical hypotheses presented below. Which specific piece of new evidence provides the most robust logical support for each argument's main conclusion? Match each argument (left) to its strongest supporting evidence (right).

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

An anthropologist argues that the sudden adoption of bronze tools by the highland Q'ero tribes resulted from peaceful trade with lowland empires, not military conquest. The discovered bronze artifacts lack the decorative engravings typical of lowland soldiers' weapons.
A marine biologist asserts that the unprecedented bleaching of the Aethel Coral Reef is primarily caused by chemical runoff from a newly opened coastal desalination plant, rather than the recently documented slight increase in local ocean temperatures.
A retail analyst predicts that the bookstore chain PageTurner will see a significant increase in profit margins next quarter. The chain recently replaced its human cashiers with automated kiosks, which cost considerably less to operate than paying employee wages.
A neurologist hypothesizes that frequent engagement with short-form video content fundamentally reduces an adult's baseline attention span. A clinical survey found that adults who watch short-form videos for over three hours daily performed significantly worse on sustained-focus tests than non-watchers.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct matches validate causal links by establishing controls, ruling out reverse causality, eliminating negative side-effects, and corroborating structural assumptions.
Each correct match directly addresses the specific logical vulnerability of its corresponding argument. The archaeological evidence removes the military utility of the bronze, the ecological evidence isolates the chemical variable from the temperature variable, the financial evidence protects the cost-savings from revenue losses, and the medical evidence proves the chronological direction of the psychological effect.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the Anthropology argument (L1)
Identify the logical gap: A lack of decorative engravings does not definitively prove the tools were not used in war.
Matching it with the evidence of functionally non-martial tools (R1) closes this gap, supporting the peaceful trade conclusion.
2
Analyze the Marine Biology argument (L2)
Identify the logical gap: Both chemicals and heat are present, and heat is a known alternative cause for bleaching.
Matching it with evidence of a control ecosystem (R2) isolates the chemical runoff as the primary culprit, proving heat alone did not cause the bleaching.
3
Analyze the Economics argument (L3)
Identify the logical gap: Lower wage costs only improve profit margins if revenues and other operational costs remain stable.
Matching it with evidence of stable transaction rates and inventory shrinkage (R3) rules out the potential negative side effects of kiosks.
4
Analyze the Neuroscience argument (L4)
Identify the logical gap: The survey is a cross-sectional snapshot, leaving the argument vulnerable to reverse causality (people with short attention spans preferring short videos).
Matching it with longitudinal data proving the groups were equal beforehand (R4) confirms the direction of causation.

Key Concept

Strengthening arguments by closing causal gaps, ruling out alternative explanations, and validating implicit assumptions.
Question 46Question →

Agricultural Economist: In 2024, the nation of Oakhaven banned the import of proprietary autonomous agricultural drones, prompting domestic farmers to adopt locally manufactured, open-source drones instead. Over the subsequent two years, agricultural yields in Oakhaven increased by 15%, and the average annual cost of farm maintenance dropped substantially. Clearly, the shift to open-source, locally manufactured drones is more efficient for Oakhaven's agricultural sector than relying on imported proprietary models.

Which of the following statements, if true, independently strengthen the economist's argument? (Select all that apply.)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Weather patterns, soil health metrics, and seed varieties utilized in Oakhaven over the past two years were virtually identical to those in the two years immediately preceding the 2024 ban.; The previously imported proprietary drones required shipping to foreign facilities for routine servicing, causing prolonged downtime during critical harvests, whereas open-source drones are rapidly serviced on-site using locally 3D-printed parts.

Answer

The statements ruling out alternative environmental causes for the yield increase and detailing the localized, faster repair mechanism.
The argument concludes that open-source drones are more efficient based on two observed phenomena: a 15% yield increase and a drop in maintenance costs. The correct answers bolster this causal claim in two distinct ways. The first correct statement eliminates alternative explanations for the yield increase by confirming that weather and soil factors remained constant, meaning the drones are highly likely to be the catalyst. The second correct statement provides the missing mechanical link for the cost drop by contrasting the efficient on-site repair of the new drones with the prolonged, expensive foreign shipping required by the old proprietary models.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument's core structure.
Premise: Switched from proprietary to open-source drones. Premise: Yields increased 15% and maintenance costs dropped. Conclusion: Open-source drones are more efficient.
Identifying the premises and main conclusion is strictly necessary to precisely evaluate the logical gaps.
2
Identify logical vulnerabilities and causal assumptions.
The argument assumes that the new drones actually caused the yield increase (ignoring weather/fertilizer variables) and that the new drones are responsible for the cost drop (ignoring potential shifts in subsidy or labor).
Strengthening an argument typically involves identifying and systematically patching these specific vulnerabilities.
3
Evaluate the options against the identified vulnerabilities.
One correct statement explicitly eliminates alternative variables (weather, seeds) for the yield spike. The other correct statement explains exactly how the new drones lowered costs (on-site repair vs. foreign shipping).
Options that rule out alternate causes or explain the causal mechanism directly increase the overall plausibility of the conclusion.

Key Concept

Strengthen (Causal Reasoning and Eliminating Alternate Explanations)
Question 47Question →

Public Health Official: Over the last decade, the municipality of Veridia has seen a 25 percent increase in residents diagnosed with chronic insomnia. During this same period, surveys indicate that the average daily screen time for adults in Veridia rose by over 30 percent. Because no other major public health trends were identified, this surge in screen time must be the primary factor driving the rise in chronic insomnia.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthen the official's argument? (Select all that apply)

Select all that apply

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Neurological research demonstrates that the specific wavelengths of light emitted by modern digital devices strongly suppress the human brain's production of sleep-inducing hormones.; Neighboring municipalities with similar demographics to Veridia, but where average screen time remained stable over the last decade, recorded no significant increase in chronic insomnia.

Answer

The correct options are the one describing the biological mechanism of blue light suppressing sleep hormones, and the one showing that neighboring municipalities without an increase in screen time saw no increase in insomnia.
The official concludes that increased screen time caused the rise in insomnia based purely on their concurrent increase over a decade. To strengthen a causal argument, one must bolster the specific link between the purported cause and the effect. The correct answers achieve this in two classic ways: first, by providing a biological mechanism that explains exactly how the cause produces the effect (blue light suppressing hormones); and second, by showing a control group where the cause is absent and the effect is simultaneously absent (neighboring towns with stable screen time and stable insomnia rates).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus to identify the premises and the main conclusion.
Premises: Insomnia increased by 25% and screen time increased by 30% simultaneously. Conclusion: The surge in screen time is the primary factor driving the rise in chronic insomnia.
Understanding the exact causal claim being made is necessary to evaluate what evidence would logically strengthen it.
2
Identify the logical gaps in the official's causal argument.
The argument assumes that a correlation between two trends implies causation, ignoring potential alternative causes, the possibility of reverse causation, and the need for a mechanism linking the two.
Strengthening a causal argument requires finding evidence that directly addresses and bridges these logical vulnerabilities.
3
Evaluate the answer choices for standard strengthening properties.
Look for options that provide a causal mechanism, show the effect is absent when the cause is absent (control group), or explicitly rule out alternative explanations. Avoid options that provide alternative causes or demonstrate reverse causation.
These are the recognized methods for validating a causal relationship in logical reasoning assessments.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Arguments
Question 48Question →

Consumer Psychologist: A recent study of a large online retailer compared two groups of customers: those who manually selected individual items for a monthly delivery and those who paid a 15 percent premium for a "curated" box, where the retailer selected items on their behalf from the same inventory. The customers receiving the curated boxes reported significantly higher overall satisfaction with their purchases. Clearly, the psychological relief of avoiding decision fatigue—the mental exhaustion that comes from making numerous choices—is the primary reason for this higher satisfaction.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the consumer psychologist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Customers who manually selected their items from a temporarily restricted, significantly smaller inventory reported higher satisfaction levels than those who manually selected from the full inventory.

Answer

The statement that customers selecting from a restricted inventory reported higher satisfaction than those selecting from the full inventory.
This option strengthens the argument by isolating the variable of choice. By showing that a mere reduction in the number of choices (a smaller inventory) leads to higher satisfaction even without expert curation or the element of surprise, it validates the psychologist's central claim that avoiding decision fatigue is the active mechanism driving the satisfaction.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion of the argument.
The conclusion is that the primary reason for higher satisfaction among curated box customers is the psychological relief of avoiding decision fatigue.
Understanding the precise causal claim is necessary to evaluate what would logically strengthen it.
2
Identify the premises and the logical gap.
Premise: Curated box customers (no choices made) have higher satisfaction than manual selection customers (many choices made). Gap: The argument assumes the cause of this difference is the lack of choices (decision fatigue), ignoring other possible causes like the quality of the curated items or the element of surprise.
Finding the logical gap allows us to anticipate what a strengthening answer must do: either rule out alternative causes or directly validate the proposed causal mechanism.
3
Evaluate the options to find one that supports the causal mechanism.
The correct option shows that reducing the number of choices in the manual selection group also increases satisfaction. This isolates the 'number of choices' variable and demonstrates that as choices decrease, satisfaction increases.
Showing a covariant relationship between the proposed cause (amount of choices) and the effect (satisfaction level) provides strong evidence that the proposed causal relationship is correct.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal arguments by demonstrating covariance or isolating variables.
Question 49Question →

Review the following four scenarios, each presenting a distinct claim based on specific premises. Pair each scenario with the corresponding statement that most effectively bridges its logical gap and reinforces the drawn conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Municipal administrators attribute the recent reduction in urban gridlock directly to the inauguration of a new mass transit initiative, noting that the decrease coincided perfectly with the system's launch.
Clinical researchers claim that a newly formulated synthetic preservative induces severe physiological imbalances, based on observations that subjects consuming items heavy in the substance developed altered endocrine profiles.
Cultural historians assert that the anonymous creator of a series of 16th-century canvas masterpieces originally trained by carving stone, pointing out the uniquely accurate volumetric rendering of the subjects.
Wildlife biologists conclude that the density of apex predators in a specific biome has expanded significantly over the past decade, basing this on records showing that recent field extraction efforts secured twice as many specimens.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The urban traffic scenario pairs with the remote-work attendance mandate statement; the clinical research scenario pairs with the separate control cohort statement; the art history scenario pairs with the plastic arts curricula statement; the wildlife biology scenario pairs with the standardized methodology statement.
Each scenario requires a distinct approach to logically strengthen its conclusion. The traffic scenario requires ruling out an alternative cause. The clinical preservative scenario requires demonstrating cause-without-effect via a control group. The art history scenario requires a premise that explicitly bridges a conceptual gap between two disparate ideas. Finally, the wildlife biology scenario requires validating the integrity and consistency of the underlying sampling data.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the urban traffic scenario to identify its logical vulnerability.
The argument relies purely on a correlation in time (transit launch and reduced gridlock) and is vulnerable to alternative causes.
Identifying the conceptual gap is the prerequisite for selecting the correct strengthening archetype.
2
Match the traffic scenario with evidence that rules out alternative causes.
The statement regarding corporate attendance mandates perfectly addresses this by eliminating remote work as a confounding variable.
Ruling out plausible alternative explanations solidifies the original causal claim.
3
Analyze the clinical research scenario regarding the synthetic preservative.
The argument establishes a correlation but lacks comparative isolation of the variable.
Without a control, physiological imbalances could logically be attributed to a myriad of other dietary or environmental factors.
4
Match the clinical scenario with proper control group data.
The statement describing an identical cohort excluding only the synthetic compound provides the necessary cause-without-effect control.
Isolating the variable in a controlled setting confirms the substance is the primary causal agent.
5
Analyze the art history scenario.
The argument assumes a direct connection between 'volumetric rendering' and 'carving stone' without establishing a necessary historical link.
Conceptual leaps between provided evidence and a specific conclusion require a bridging premise.
6
Match the art history scenario with the bridging premise.
The statement linking spatial accuracy exclusively to plastic arts and masonry guilds provides the definitive link.
This directly connects the observed evidence in the paintings to the author's specific conclusion about the artist's foundational training.
7
Analyze the wildlife biology scenario.
The conclusion heavily relies on sampling data being accurately representative of the entire population.
Increases in catch rates can often be attributed to improved techniques or better locations rather than biological expansion.
8
Match the wildlife scenario with evidence of methodological consistency.
The statement confirming that physical collection apparatus and deployment were exact replicates validates the data integrity.
Ruling out changes in sampling efficiency ensures the data accurately reflects genuine population trends.

Key Concept

Argument Strengthening Archetypes
Estimated Time:2m 30s
PreviousPage 3 / 3
Strengthen Practice Questions — LSAT — Page 3 | Examkin