Role in Argument

26 questions

Question 21Question →

Consider the following argument:

Evolutionary Biologist: Some neo-Darwinian traditionalists argue that epigenetic modifications cannot influence macroevolutionary trajectories because acquired methylation patterns are erased during gametogenesis. However, recent multigenerational studies of Arabidopsis exposed to severe drought demonstrated that chromatin remodeling alterations persisted across twelve generations without genetic sequence changes. Because these stable modifications directly enhanced desiccation tolerance, epigenetic inheritance can indeed provide a durable substrate for natural selection. Thus, prevailing models of evolutionary adaptation must be revised to incorporate non-genetic hereditary mechanisms.

Match each statement from the evolutionary biologist's argument to its precise functional role within the overall reasoning structure.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Epigenetic modifications cannot influence macroevolutionary trajectories.
Chromatin remodeling alterations persisted across twelve generations without genetic sequence changes in drought-exposed Arabidopsis.
Epigenetic inheritance can provide a durable substrate for natural selection.
Prevailing models of evolutionary adaptation must be revised to incorporate non-genetic hereditary mechanisms.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The opposing claim matches the neo-Darwinian traditionalists' view; the empirical premise matches the Arabidopsis multigenerational study; the subsidiary conclusion matches the assertion that epigenetic inheritance provides a substrate for selection; and the main conclusion matches the statement that prevailing evolutionary models must be revised.
The argument follows a classical structural progression: it presents an opposing perspective, provides empirical premises disproving that perspective, establishes an intermediate conclusion from that empirical evidence, and concludes with a broader main conclusion regarding theoretical models.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary conclusion of the stimulus.
The final sentence ('Thus, prevailing models of evolutionary adaptation must be revised...') is the main conclusion because it represents the culmination of the author's argument.
The conclusion indicator 'Thus' signals the overarching assertion supported by the preceding reasoning.
2
Locate the opposing viewpoint and evaluate its contextual function.
The initial statement that epigenetic modifications cannot influence macroevolutionary trajectories is attributed to 'some neo-Darwinian traditionalists' and is targeted for refutation.
The pivot word 'However' indicates that the author is contrasting their position with this initial counter-claim.
3
Distinguish between the foundational premise and the intermediate conclusion.
The report of chromatin remodeling persisting across twelve generations is an empirical observation (premise), whereas the statement that epigenetic inheritance can provide a substrate for natural selection is a claim inferred from that observation (subsidiary conclusion).
The word 'Because' shows that the persistence of modifications serves as evidence leading to the subsidiary claim, which in turn justifies the main conclusion.
4
Map each argument component to its structural descriptor.
Each of the four elements corresponds uniquely to one opposing claim, one factual premise, one intermediate conclusion, and one overarching conclusion.
Synthesizing the structural relations confirms complete and mutually exclusive functional roles.

Key Concept

Hierarchical Argument Structure and Functional Role Identification
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 22Question →

Consider the following argument:

Cognitive Neuroscientist: Some researchers claim that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is the primary phase responsible for long-term declarative memory consolidation. However, this view fails to account for recent optogenetic experiments. In those experiments, selectively suppressing non-REM slow-wave oscillations in mice completely blocked hippocampal-to-cortical information transfer, whereas suppressing REM theta rhythms caused no measurable memory deficit. Thus, non-REM slow-wave activity is the crucial neural mechanism for declarative memory consolidation. Therefore, clinical developers targeting memory-loss pathologies should focus their interventions on restoring slow-wave sleep architecture rather than REM sleep.

Based on the argument above, arrange the following statements in order of structural logical dependency, from the foundational premise (basic evidence) through the intermediate conclusion to the overall main conclusion.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The statements in order of logical dependency are: first, the experimental observation regarding optogenetic suppression of slow-wave oscillations versus theta rhythms (foundational premise); second, the claim that non-REM slow-wave activity is the crucial mechanism for consolidation (intermediate conclusion); and third, the recommendation that therapeutic development should prioritize restoring slow-wave architecture (overall main conclusion).
In this argument, the empirical finding from optogenetic experiments serves as the base premise. From this experimental finding, the author deduces an intermediate conclusion regarding the neural mechanism of memory consolidation (marked by 'Thus'). That mechanistic intermediate conclusion then serves as the essential reason supporting the author's final prescriptive recommendation (marked by 'Therefore'), establishing a clear linear dependency chain from basic premise to subsidiary conclusion to main conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the foundational evidence (unargued premise)
The observation that suppressing non-REM slow-wave oscillations blocked transfer while suppressing REM theta rhythms did not is presented as raw empirical data without supporting arguments.
Foundational premises provide the evidential base and do not depend logically on other claims in the argument.
2
Identify the intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion
The claim that non-REM slow-wave activity is the crucial neural mechanism is introduced with the indicator 'Thus' and follows logically from the experimental results, while serving to justify the subsequent recommendation.
An intermediate conclusion receives support from initial premises and simultaneously lends logical support to the final conclusion.
3
Identify the primary (main) conclusion
The claim that clinical developers should focus interventions on restoring slow-wave sleep architecture is introduced with 'Therefore' and represents the ultimate takeaway of the neuroscientist's reasoning.
The main conclusion is the terminal point of the argument's inferential chain and is not used to support any further claims.

Key Concept

Structural dependency and hierarchical roles in multi-step arguments
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 23Question →

Epistemologist: Many scientists assert that the ultimate aim of physics is to achieve a completely objective description of the universe, independent of human perception. However, any theoretical model must necessarily be formulated using mathematical structures, which are themselves cognitive constructs inherent to human reasoning. Therefore, a perfectly objective description of reality is a fundamental impossibility. Given that the institutional pursuit of impossible ideals systematically diverts funding from pragmatically solvable problems, the scientific community ought to officially reorient its primary objectives toward maximizing predictive utility rather than seeking absolute ontological truth.

Which of the following most accurately describes the role played in the epistemologist's argument by the claim that a perfectly objective description of reality is a fundamental impossibility?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It is an intermediate conclusion drawn from a premise about the cognitive basis of theoretical models, and it is used to support the argument's main prescriptive claim.

Answer

The statement acts as an intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion that bridges the gap between the initial premise about cognitive constructs and the final recommendation about reorienting scientific objectives.
The correct answer accurately maps the two-fold structural role of the targeted claim. First, it is a conclusion supported by the preceding sentence (which states that theoretical models rely on cognitive constructs). Second, it acts as a premise for the final sentence, establishing that absolute ontological truth is an 'impossible ideal', which in turn supports the final recommendation to reorient scientific objectives. A claim that is both supported by premises and used to support the main conclusion is definitively an intermediate conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus to determine the epistemologist's ultimate point.
The main conclusion is the final clause: the scientific community ought to officially reorient its primary objectives toward maximizing predictive utility.
The phrase 'ought to' signals a final recommendation, and this claim is logically supported by all the preceding reasoning about impossible ideals.
2
Determine the structural function of the targeted claim.
The claim is introduced by 'Therefore' and directly follows the assertion about theoretical models being cognitive constructs.
Structural indicator words like 'Therefore' explicitly mark conclusions that are drawn from preceding premises.
3
Trace the logical connection between the targeted claim and the main conclusion.
The targeted claim establishes that an objective description is an 'impossible ideal.' The subsequent sentence uses this established fact as a premise to justify the main conclusion.
Because the claim is supported by previous statements and, in turn, supports the final conclusion, its structural role is that of an intermediate (or subsidiary) conclusion.

Key Concept

Identifying intermediate conclusions and mapping multi-step argument structures.
Question 24Question →

An argument concerning linguistic preservation contains the following claims. Arrange these claims in order of their structural dependency, starting from the most foundational basic premise and ending with the main conclusion.

Drag items to arrange them in the correct order

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The correct sequence of structural dependency is: the saturation of media (Item 2), leading to adolescents adopting dominant paradigms (Item 4), which causes the breakdown of language transfer (Item 5), resulting in the threat of obsolescence (Item 3), and finally leading to the prescriptive conclusion to redirect funding (Item 1).
The argument follows a strict causal and logical chain. It begins with the root cause of media saturation, which causes youth to adopt new paradigms. This adoption breaks down family language transfer, which threatens the dialects with extinction. Finally, this threat serves as the premise for the prescriptive conclusion that researchers must redirect their efforts.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
Item 1 is the main conclusion.
Item 1 contains a prescriptive 'must' statement regarding funding redirection, which represents the ultimate point the author is attempting to establish based on the factual evidence.
2
Identify the foundational premise that requires no prior support.
Item 2 is the basic premise.
Item 2 states a factual phenomenon (media saturation) that initiates the causal chain and is not supported by any other statement in the provided set.
3
Determine the direct consequence of the foundational premise.
Item 4 logically follows Item 2.
The saturation of homogenized media (Item 2) directly causes the behavioral shift of adolescents adopting dominant paradigms (Item 4).
4
Trace the subsequent intermediate effects to link to the main conclusion.
Item 4 leads to Item 5, which then leads to Item 3.
Adolescents adopting dominant languages causes the breakdown of family-level intergenerational transfer (Item 5), which in turn pushes these dialects to the brink of obsolescence (Item 3). This imminent threat directly justifies the main conclusion (Item 1).

Key Concept

Role in Argument and Structural Dependency
Question 25Question →

Analyze the argument below. Match each quoted excerpt from the argument to its precise structural role.

Historian of Science: Some evolutionary biologists maintain that sudden environmental upheavals are the primary drivers of rapid morphological innovation in species. However, recent high-resolution stratigraphic analyses reveal that the most significant morphological divergences often precede major tectonic or climatic events by millions of years. Consequently, catastrophic environmental upheaval cannot be the primary instigator of rapid evolutionary change. Furthermore, laboratory studies have demonstrated that genetic regulatory networks can accumulate silent mutations over millennia, remaining phenotypically dormant until triggered by cumulative, internal metabolic shifts rather than external factors. Therefore, intrinsic genetic mechanisms must play a more foundational role in punctuated morphological innovation than external environmental shocks.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Some evolutionary biologists maintain that sudden environmental upheavals are the primary drivers of rapid morphological innovation in species.
Recent high-resolution stratigraphic analyses reveal that the most significant morphological divergences often precede major tectonic or climatic events by millions of years.
Catastrophic environmental upheaval cannot be the primary instigator of rapid evolutionary change.
Intrinsic genetic mechanisms must play a more foundational role in punctuated morphological innovation than external environmental shocks.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The biologists' claim matches the discredited hypothesis; the stratigraphic data matches the undermining evidence; the rejection of upheaval as the primary instigator matches the subsidiary conclusion; and the primacy of genetic mechanisms matches the overarching position.
Each excerpt has a distinct, definable function in the argumentative structure, correctly matching the roles of opposing hypothesis, counter-evidence, intermediate conclusion, and main conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the main conclusion of the argument.
The final sentence stating that intrinsic genetic mechanisms play a more foundational role is the main conclusion.
It is flagged by the indicator 'Therefore' and synthesizes the preceding evidence into the author's ultimate claim.
2
Determine the role of the initial viewpoint.
The claim about sudden environmental upheavals being primary drivers is the opposing hypothesis.
It is attributed to 'some evolutionary biologists' and immediately countered by 'However'.
3
Analyze the evidence immediately following the opposing viewpoint.
The stratigraphic analyses serve as empirical evidence to undermine the opposing hypothesis.
It shows a chronological impossibility (the effect precedes the alleged cause), effectively attacking the opposing view.
4
Categorize the deduction drawn from the counter-evidence.
The statement that environmental upheaval cannot be the primary instigator is a subsidiary conclusion.
It is deduced from the stratigraphic evidence (indicated by 'Consequently') and acts as a premise for the final conclusion.

Key Concept

Role in Argument
Question 26Question →

Urban Planner: The proposed elimination of single-family zoning is ultimately unlikely to lower overall housing costs in our city. True, city officials advocate for this change precisely to increase density and reduce costs. But simply removing restrictions usually spurs luxury developments rather than affordable units. Consequently, unless paired with strict affordable housing mandates, relaxing zoning fails to achieve the officials' objective. Yet such mandates deter developers from building at all, severely restricting the new supply needed to bring down market prices.

Which of the following most accurately describes the role played in the argument by the claim that, unless paired with strict affordable housing mandates, relaxing zoning fails to achieve the officials' objective?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: It is a subsidiary conclusion that is supported by the claim about luxury developments and that is itself used to support the overall conclusion.

Answer

The targeted statement is a subsidiary conclusion that is supported by the claim about luxury developments and that is itself used to support the overall conclusion.
The correct answer accurately describes the dual nature of the targeted statement. The argument's main conclusion is the first sentence. To prove this, the author sets up a dilemma. The targeted statement ('Consequently, unless paired with strict affordable housing mandates, relaxing zoning fails...') is drawn directly from the preceding premise about luxury developments. It functions as an intermediate (subsidiary) conclusion that, when combined with the final sentence regarding the negative effects of mandates, proves the main conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Locate the main conclusion of the argument.
The main conclusion is the first sentence: 'The proposed elimination of single-family zoning is ultimately unlikely to lower overall housing costs in our city.'
This is the primary assertion the urban planner is trying to prove, and all other claims in the stimulus are designed to support it.
2
Analyze the logical indicators around the targeted statement.
The targeted statement begins with the structural indicator 'Consequently,' signaling that it is a conclusion drawn from previous information.
Identifying conclusion indicators helps determine whether a claim functions as a premise, a conclusion, or context.
3
Trace the logical support for and from the targeted statement.
The statement is supported by the preceding premise that removing restrictions spurs luxury developments. In turn, it serves as a stepping stone to support the main conclusion.
Because it is supported by a premise and supports the main conclusion, its structural role is definitively that of a subsidiary (or intermediate) conclusion.

Key Concept

Identifying intermediate conclusions and complex logical structures in arguments.
PreviousPage 2 / 2
Role in Argument Practice Questions — LSAT — Page 2 | Examkin