Strengthen

75 questions

Question 1Question →

Agricultural Researcher: In a recent field study, apple orchards that maintained wildflower strips between tree rows had 40 percent fewer infestations of codling moth larvae than adjacent orchards with bare soil between rows. Because wildflower strips attract parasitic wasps that lay eggs in codling moth larvae, the researchers concluded that the presence of these wasps was responsible for the lower infestation rates in the wildflower-bordered orchards.

Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the agricultural researchers' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Orchards with wildflower strips exhibited a significantly higher proportion of parasitized codling moth larvae than did orchards with bare soil.

Answer

The statement that orchards with wildflower strips exhibited a significantly higher proportion of parasitized codling moth larvae than did orchards with bare soil most strengthens the argument.
The conclusion asserts a specific causal mechanism: the parasitic wasps attracted by the wildflower strips caused the reduction in codling moth larvae. Evidence showing that orchards with wildflower strips actually had a significantly higher proportion of parasitized larvae directly substantiates this mechanism, making it much more likely that wasp activity was responsible for the lower pest levels.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument
Premise: Orchards with wildflower strips had 40% fewer codling moth larvae. Premise: Wildflower strips attract parasitic wasps that lay eggs in these larvae. Conclusion: The presence of the parasitic wasps caused the reduction in larvae.
Understanding the precise gap between the premises and the conclusion is essential for strengthening the causal claim.
2
Evaluate the causal vulnerability in the author's reasoning
The author assumes that because the wasps are attracted to the wildflower strips, they are actively attacking the larvae in those specific orchards, rather than the reduction being caused by some other factor associated with the flowers.
Strengthening a causal conclusion requires either ruling out alternative causes or providing direct evidence that the proposed mechanism operated as claimed.
3
Select the choice that directly substantiates the proposed causal mechanism
Finding direct evidence of increased larval parasitism in the wildflower orchards confirms that the wasps were actively attacking the pest population, thereby substantiating the proposed mechanism.
Direct confirmation that the causal agent produced its expected intermediate effect provides strong support for the conclusion.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Claims by Confirming Mechanism
Question 2Question →

Match each short argument on the left with the evidentiary finding on the right that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Archaeologists excavating pre-Columbian earthworks in the Llanos de Moxos noted that plots enriched with charcoal-based terra preta supported continuous maize cultivation for centuries without nutrient exhaustion. Researchers concluded that the deliberate addition of charcoal compost was the primary factor preventing tropical soil leaching in these fields.
Zoologists observed that European robins in metropolitan areas sing at higher frequencies than their rural counterparts. Because city traffic produces loud, low-frequency sound, the researchers concluded that this vocal frequency adjustment is an active behavioral adaptation to prevent traffic noise from masking territorial signals.
During seventeenth-century Sweden's copper-standard era, commodity prices surged each time the central treasury issued heavy copper plate currency. Economic historians concluded that the domestic price inflation was directly driven by the expansion of the circulating copper money supply rather than by concurrent wartime shipping blockades.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Argument 1 (charcoal soil fertility) matches with the control plot finding showing non-charcoal plots suffered leaching; Argument 2 (urban robin vocal frequency) matches with the sound-chamber experiment demonstrating frequency-specific pitch elevation; Argument 3 (Swedish copper inflation) matches with the inland provincial data showing inflation independent of trade blockades.
Each correct match pairs an argument with an empirical finding that eliminates a major competing explanation: the agricultural match uses a negative control to prove charcoal's unique role; the ornithology match uses frequency-selective testing to confirm adaptive signal design; and the economic match uses an insulated market subset to rule out wartime blockades.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core conclusion and potential causal gap in the agricultural argument.
The argument concludes that charcoal compost prevented nutrient leaching, assuming other farming techniques or environmental factors were not solely responsible.
Strengthening this requires an effective control comparison demonstrating that the charcoal element was the decisive factor in preventing soil exhaustion.
2
Analyze the urban ornithology argument regarding noise masking.
The argument concludes that robins actively shift pitch to counter low-frequency traffic masking, assuming the shift is not a generalized physiological stress reaction to overall noise volume.
Strengthening this requires evidence showing the behavioral response is specifically calibrated to low frequencies rather than all auditory disturbances.
3
Analyze the economic history argument attributing price surges to currency expansion.
The argument asserts copper issuance caused inflation while dismissing trade blockades as the primary cause.
Strengthening this requires ruling out trade blockades by showing currency expansion generated inflation even in isolated regions immune to blockade effects.

Key Concept

Evaluating evidentiary support by establishing control comparisons, demonstrating frequency specificity, and eliminating confounding causal variables.
Estimated Time:2m 0s
Question 3Question →

Match each brief argument with the supplementary finding that most effectively strengthens its reasoning by ruling out a competing alternative explanation.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Dendrochronologist: Subpolar larch tree rings from the mid-sixth century show sudden, severe growth deceleration, a pattern previously attributed to a solar minimum. However, sulfate spikes in synchronized polar ice cores indicate massive atmospheric sulfur aerosol loading from volcanic eruptions during the same decade. Therefore, volcanic atmospheric dimming, rather than decreased solar output, caused this growth deceleration.
Public Health Analyst: Following a municipal ban on industrial trans-fats in commercial food service in Riverdale, hospitalizations for acute coronary events dropped by 18 percent over four years. Because neighboring counties without such ordinances experienced no comparable decline in cardiac hospitalizations, Riverdale's trans-fat restriction was responsible for the decrease.
Management Researcher: A software engineering firm transitioned its development teams to a hybrid remote schedule. Over the subsequent six months, weekly completed software deliverables and bug resolution rates increased by 22 percent. The firm's executives concluded that remote flexibility directly increased developer productivity.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Argument 1 matches the finding on solar irradiance baseline (Beryllium-10 data); Argument 2 matches the finding controlling for confounding health initiatives and lifestyle rates; Argument 3 matches the finding controlling for task complexity and developer work hours.
Each correct pairing resolves a primary causal gap by ruling out key confounding factors: the solar irradiance measurement confirms solar activity did not drive the climatic cooling; the multi-county public health control confirms no separate cardiovascular programs or lifestyle shifts accounted for the decline; and the software metrics audit confirms gains were not the product of simpler tickets or extended work hours.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary causal claim and potential unstated vulnerabilities in each argument
Argument 1 compares two competing physical causes (volcano vs. solar); Argument 2 makes an epidemiological claim about a policy intervention vs. unmeasured confounding health factors; Argument 3 attributes an output increase to worker efficiency rather than task triviality or longer hours.
Strengthening causal arguments frequently requires eliminating plausible alternative explanations for the observed effect.
2
Evaluate which supplementary finding directly neutralizes the specific rival explanation for each argument
Finding on Beryllium-10 rules out the solar minimum hypothesis for tree rings; finding on concurrent campaigns rules out alternative health interventions for the coronary decline; finding on task complexity and total hours rules out work-hour inflation and easier tasks for the developer output gains.
Each supplementary statement must uniquely provide evidence that fortifies the precise premise-to-conclusion gap of its paired argument.
3
Verify one-to-one correspondence across all pairs
Each argument is uniquely supported by the finding addressing its domain and causal gap without cross-applicability.
Ensures complete logical alignment and unambiguous matching.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Arguments via Elimination of Alternative Explanations
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 4Question →

To reduce errors during the preparation of sterile injectable medications, a regional hospital network required pharmacy technicians to wear high-visibility vests designating 'no-interruption zones' during compounding tasks. Over the twelve months following the policy's introduction, compounding errors fell by 35 percent across all network facilities. Because observational logs confirmed that unscheduled interruptions during compounding also dropped by 70 percent over that same period, administrators concluded that the reduction in interruptions was the primary cause of the decrease in medication errors.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the administrators' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In several satellite pharmacies within the network where the vests were worn but staff continued to interrupt technicians at pre-policy rates, compounding error rates did not decrease.

Answer

In several satellite pharmacies within the network where the vests were worn but staff continued to interrupt technicians at pre-policy rates, compounding error rates did not decrease.
The conclusion asserts a direct causal relationship: reducing interruptions led to fewer compounding errors. The credited choice provides strong corroborating evidence by demonstrating a negative control. In facilities where the vests were worn but the reduction in interruptions did not occur, errors did not drop. This shows that the effect requires the hypothesized cause, effectively ruling out the possibility that the mere presence of vests, increased employee vigilance from being studied, or network-wide background trends accounted for the decline.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument's structure and identify the core gap
Premises: Vests were introduced; interruptions fell by 70%; compounding errors fell by 35%. Conclusion: The reduction in interruptions caused the drop in errors. Gap: A correlation between fewer interruptions and fewer errors does not prove causation; other factors or the mere introduction of the vests (such as increased self-awareness) could be responsible.
Strengthening a causal conclusion requires reinforcing the link between the proposed cause and effect or eliminating alternative explanations.
2
Identify the strengthening mechanism
Show that when the cause (reduction in interruptions) is absent, the effect (reduction in errors) does not occur, even when the vest policy is implemented.
Providing a control case showing that the effect fails to appear when the hypothesized cause is absent validates the causal attribution.
3
Evaluate the answer choices against the target mechanism
The statement regarding satellite pharmacies where vests were worn without a decrease in interruptions demonstrating no reduction in error rates confirms the causal mechanism.
This isolates the reduction in interruptions as the active causal factor, ruling out the vest's appearance or general policy awareness as the driver.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Claims via Control Conditions
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 5Question →

Hospital Administrator: Six months ago, our surgical recovery ward replaced standard ceiling panels with specialized acoustic dampening tiles. In the six months following the installation, patients in this ward requested 28 percent fewer doses of supplemental pain medication than patients admitted during the six months immediately preceding the renovation. However, acoustic monitoring revealed that ambient noise levels dropped by only 2 decibels—a change imperceptible to the human ear. Since this minor physical sound reduction could not account for such a marked improvement, the decline in pain medication requests was most likely the result of a placebo effect caused by patients' awareness that the hospital had upgraded the facility.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the hospital administrator's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In a separate surgical recovery unit where identical acoustic tiles were installed without the patients being informed or the alterations being visibly noticeable, requests for supplemental pain medication showed no measurable decline.

Answer

The finding that an unannounced and visually unnoticeable installation of identical acoustic tiles in another unit produced no decline in pain medication requests.
The correct choice reinforces the causal conclusion by demonstrating a negative control. When the physical tiles are present but patient awareness is absent, the reduction in pain medication requests does not occur. This rules out the rival explanation that the physical properties of the tiles were responsible and confirms that patient awareness was the necessary factor producing the outcome.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus argument structure and identify the conclusion and premises.
The premises state that pain medication requests fell by 28 percent after acoustic tiles were installed, but measured sound reduction was an imperceptible 2 decibels. The conclusion is that the decline was caused by a psychological placebo effect stemming from patients' awareness of the upgrade.
Strengthening an argument requires identifying the core causal claim linking the evidence to the conclusion.
2
Identify the primary vulnerability or logical gap in the argument.
The author concludes that awareness (placebo) caused the improvement solely because overall decibel reduction was imperceptible, overlooking potential unmeasured physical benefits of the tiles and assuming without proof that awareness was the operative factor.
A strong strengthener must validate the proposed causal link or rule out the physical presence of the tiles as the direct cause.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to isolate the statement that best bridges this gap.
Showing that installing identical tiles without patient awareness failed to produce any decrease in pain medication isolates the variable of awareness, demonstrating that the physical tiles alone were insufficient to cause the effect.
Applying the method of difference confirms that the effect occurs only in the presence of the hypothesized cause.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Claims via Controlled Comparison
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 6Question →

Marine Biologist: Benthic gastropods (*Alviniconcha*) residing near deep-sea hydrothermal vents in sulfide-rich plumes harbor chemosynthetic endosymbionts in their gill tissues and possess notably thicker shells than conspecifics inhabiting iron-dominated plumes, which consistently lack these endosymbionts. Because thicker shells confer greater structural defense against hydrostatic pressure, the biologist concludes that metabolic activity of the endosymbionts directly promotes shell thickening by concentrating dissolved calcium ions.

Statement: The finding that *Alviniconcha* specimens transferred from iron-dominated plumes to sulfide-rich plumes develop thicker shells only when their gill tissues become successfully colonized by chemosynthetic bacteria strengthens the marine biologist's argument.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The statement is true because the empirical finding isolates the presence of the endosymbionts from the ambient plume chemistry, showing that the physical environment alone does not trigger shell thickening without bacterial colonization. Eliminating this rival causal explanation substantially strengthens the marine biologist's conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument into its premises, unstated assumptions, and conclusion.
Premise: Gastropods in sulfide plumes have endosymbionts and thicker shells; gastropods in iron plumes lack both. Conclusion: Endosymbionts causally promote shell thickening. Key Gap: The observed correlation might be driven by the sulfide-rich environment itself rather than bacterial metabolism.
Identifying the inferential leap from correlation to causation allows targeted evaluation of potential strengtheners.
2
Analyze the logical impact of the supplementary experimental finding.
The finding shows that introducing the snail to the sulfide plume is insufficient on its own to produce thicker shells; shell thickening happens only when bacterial colonization succeeds.
This establishes covariation while holding environmental surroundings constant, ruling out the background water chemistry as an independent cause.
3
Judge whether the statement correctly characterizes the finding as a strengthener.
Because ruling out a major confounding explanation increases the plausibility of the author's causal claim, the finding does strengthen the argument, making the statement True.
A claim that eliminates a rival causal mechanism functions as a valid strengthener under LSAT standards.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal claims by ruling out confounding environmental variables and demonstrating controlled covariation
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 7Question →

Ecologist: Over the past decade, populations of the yellow-bellied marmot in a subalpine valley have emerged from hibernation an average of three weeks earlier than they did thirty years ago. Some researchers attribute this shift primarily to rising spring temperatures. However, during the same thirty-year period, local winter snowpack depth decreased by nearly forty percent, exposing burrow entrances to direct sunlight much earlier in the season. Because marmots awaken primarily in response to ambient light penetrating their burrow entrances rather than ambient air temperature, the earlier emergence is almost certainly a result of reduced snowpack rather than warmer air.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the ecologist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In neighboring subalpine valleys where spring temperatures increased at similar rates but winter snowpack depth remained constant, marmot emergence dates did not advance significantly.

Answer

The statement showing that marmot emergence dates did not change in valleys where temperatures rose but snowpack remained constant most strengthens the argument.
The argument concludes that reduced snowpack (which permits light penetration), rather than rising air temperature, is the cause of earlier marmot emergence. The correct choice provides a comparative control case: where air temperature rose but snowpack depth remained historically constant, marmot emergence did not shift. By showing that the effect does not occur in the absence of the author's proposed cause, even when the rival cause is present, this choice effectively rules out air temperature as the driving factor and bolsters the ecologist's conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument
Conclusion: The earlier emergence is almost certainly caused by reduced snowpack rather than warmer air. Premises: Marmots emerge 3 weeks earlier; snowpack decreased by 40%; marmot awakening is triggered primarily by light penetrating burrow entrances rather than ambient air temperature.
Understanding the precise causal relationship claimed by the author is essential to finding the most supportive evidence.
2
Identify the logical gap or competing explanation
The rival explanation claims that rising spring temperatures caused the earlier emergence. The author dismisses this, attributing the change to reduced snowpack/light.
Strengthening a causal argument typically involves ruling out an alternative cause or demonstrating that the effect does not occur when the proposed cause is absent.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the strongest supportive claim
The choice providing a control group (temperature increased but snowpack depth remained constant, resulting in no shift in emergence) directly demonstrates that temperature increases alone are insufficient to advance emergence dates.
Showing that the effect is absent when the suspected cause (reduced snowpack) is absent, despite the presence of the rival cause (warm temperatures), strongly validates the author's causal conclusion.

Key Concept

Strengthening a Causal Claim via Elimination of an Alternative Cause
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 8Question →

Geothermal power facilities in the Salton Rift circulate hot subterranean brine to drive turbines, after which the cooled fluid is reinjected deep underground. An energy consortium recently proposed extracting dissolved lithium from this brine prior to reinjection. Industry critics contend that commercial extraction will accelerate mineral scaling within reinjection wells, precipitating costly pipe blockages and rendering operations economically unviable. However, plant engineers argue that the extraction process will not increase well-clogging rates, noting that the chemical adsorbent used to capture lithium also extracts dissolved silica precursors from the brine. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the plant engineers' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Silica precipitation is the predominant cause of mineral scaling and pipe obstruction in geothermal reinjection wells.

Answer

The statement that silica precipitation is the predominant cause of mineral scaling and pipe obstruction in geothermal reinjection wells provides the strongest support.
The engineers argue that lithium extraction will not increase well-clogging rates based on the premise that the extraction medium also removes silica precursors. This argument is vulnerable unless silica precipitation is actually a significant cause of well blockages. By establishing that silica precipitation is the primary agent of mineral scaling, the correct statement demonstrates that removing these precursors eliminates the main source of clogging, thereby strongly reinforcing the engineers' conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Isolate the conclusion and supporting premises of the argument.
Conclusion: The lithium extraction process will not increase well-clogging rates. Premise: The adsorbent used to extract lithium also removes dissolved silica precursors.
Strengthen questions require identifying the exact logical gap between the stated evidence and the author's final claim.
2
Identify the underlying unstated assumption linking the premise to the conclusion.
The argument assumes that removing silica precursors has a meaningful mitigating impact on the overall rate of mineral scaling in the reinjection wells.
If silica were irrelevant to well scaling, removing its precursors would not protect against clogging.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement that validates this connection.
Confirming that silica precipitation is the primary driver of scaling connects the removal of silica precursors directly to the prevention of well clogging.
Validating that silica is the primary scaling agent provides robust logical support for the engineers' conclusion.

Key Concept

Bridging a causal gap by demonstrating that a removed compound is the primary contributor to the adverse outcome under consideration.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 9Question →

Urban Planner: Last year, the city of Greenfield introduced a subsidized bicycle-sharing program in its downtown core to reduce rush-hour automobile congestion. Despite high enrollment in the program, traffic sensor data indicated that downtown automobile volume during peak hours did not decrease. Several city council members concluded that the bicycle-sharing program had no effect on reducing car trips. However, their conclusion overlooks the fact that during the same year, a major regional bridge closure diverted thousands of commuter vehicles into Greenfield's downtown streets that would have otherwise bypassed the city.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the urban planner's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: A municipal survey conducted during the program found that a substantial majority of regular bicycle-share users had previously driven personal automobiles for their daily downtown commutes.

Answer

A municipal survey conducted during the program found that a substantial majority of regular bicycle-share users had previously driven personal automobiles for their daily downtown commutes.
The urban planner contends that the bicycle-sharing program did reduce car trips, but that the reduction was obscured by thousands of vehicles diverted into downtown due to a bridge closure. The correct answer provides direct empirical evidence that the program converted previous automobile drivers into bicycle commuters. Establishing that mode substitution occurred directly validates the planner's claim that the program reduced car trips, confirming that the lack of net traffic reduction was attributable to the offsetting diverted traffic.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the urban planner's argument.
The planner argues that the council members are wrong to conclude the bike-share program failed to reduce car trips, citing the bridge closure as an external factor that added traffic and masked the program's true impact.
Understanding the precise argumentative gap is necessary to identify evidence that bolsters the planner's position against the council members.
2
Analyze the underlying assumption bridging the evidence and the conclusion.
The planner assumes that the bicycle-sharing program actually caused former drivers to switch modes of transportation, and that this reduction was masked by the influx of diverted bridge traffic.
To strengthen the claim that the program was effective despite flat overall traffic numbers, we must provide evidence that bicycle trips directly displaced prior car trips.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement that directly substantiates this assumption.
Confirming that regular bicycle-share users previously commuted by car proves mode substitution occurred, verifying that car trips were indeed eliminated by the program.
This rules out the possibility that the bicycle-share program was used only by people who previously walked or took transit, thereby confirming the planner's hypothesis.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal arguments by providing direct evidence that the intended mechanism occurred while an external confounding factor masked the aggregate statistical outcome.
Question 10Question →

Match each argument on the left with the evidentiary finding on the right that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Marine biologists observed that deep-sea vent crabs graze on bacterial mats almost exclusively immediately following pulses of dissolved methane from hydrothermal vents. They concluded that methane surges directly trigger the crabs' grazing activity.
A developmental study found that children whose parents frequently used spatial terms during block play scored significantly higher on geometric rotation tests three months later than peers. The researchers concluded that hearing spatial terms actively enhances geometric reasoning in young children.
To curb urban vehicular emissions, a metropolitan transit agency eliminated fares on its light-rail network. Because total rail ridership increased by 40 percent over the subsequent six months, planners concluded that the fare-free policy successfully lowered automotive carbon emissions.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The marine biology argument pairs with the finding isolating methane in a controlled aquarium; the spatial language argument pairs with the finding controlling for children's baseline spatial aptitude; and the transit policy argument pairs with the finding confirming that new light-rail riders shifted specifically from gasoline automobiles.
Each matched pair directly targets and resolves the core analytical vulnerability of its argument. For the marine biology argument, the controlled aquarium finding eliminates environmental confounding variables. For the developmental study, controlling for baseline aptitude rules out selection bias and reverse causation. For the transit policy, demonstrating that new riders displaced automobile trips confirms that increased ridership actually reduced automobile emissions.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the reasoning gap in the marine biology argument.
The argument assumes methane directly causes feeding, ignoring potential confounding variables that accompany hydrothermal venting events.
Strengthening a causal claim requires isolating the causal agent or eliminating third-variable explanations.
2
Identify the reasoning gap in the developmental language study.
The argument fails to account for preexisting spatial aptitude that might have caused both higher test scores and greater parental engagement.
Strengthening an observational correlation requires ruling out selection bias and reverse causality.
3
Identify the reasoning gap in the municipal transit argument.
The argument equates higher public transit use with reduced car emissions without establishing where the new passengers originated.
Strengthening a policy claim requires verifying the substitution mechanism from the polluting activity.
4
Match each argument with its uniquely targeted strengthener.
Each argument pairs precisely with the finding that resolves its specific logical vulnerability.
Each strengthener supplies the exact evidentiary bridge required by its respective argument.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal and inductive arguments by isolating causal variables, controlling for baseline selection bias, and confirming essential substitution mechanisms.
Question 11Question →

Archaeologist: Excavations at the Bronze Age settlement of Tell el-Marwa revealed that grinding stones from the early occupational layer were made exclusively from local sandstone, whereas those from the late layer were predominantly made from imported basalt. Because basalt is significantly harder and more durable than sandstone, producing finer flour with far less stone grit, researchers concluded that the inhabitants switched to basalt primarily to improve the dietary quality and texture of their grain products.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the researchers' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Human skeletal remains from the late occupational layer exhibit significantly less dental enamel abrasion and microscopic tooth fracturing than do remains from the early layer.

Answer

The finding that human skeletal remains from the late occupational layer exhibit significantly less dental enamel abrasion and microscopic tooth fracturing than remains from the early layer.
The correct response provides direct physical evidence that the population experienced the specific dietary improvement hypothesized by the researchers. Observing reduced tooth wear and enamel fracturing in late-period skeletons confirms that food processed with basalt contained less abrasive grit, strongly reinforcing the claim that the transition was tied to dietary quality.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus to isolate the premises and conclusion.
Premises establish that early tools were local sandstone while late tools were imported basalt, which produces finer flour with less grit. The conclusion asserts that inhabitants switched to basalt primarily to improve dietary quality and grain texture.
Clarifying the argument's structure identifies the underlying assumption connecting tool composition to intended dietary improvement.
2
Identify the reasoning gap in the argument.
The argument assumes that the switch to basalt actually yielded a tangible dietary benefit and was not driven by non-culinary factors or resource scarcity.
Strengthening requires corroborating the expected physical outcome of the dietary improvement or ruling out competing explanations.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement providing the strongest support.
Direct physical evidence showing a reduction in tooth enamel wear among late-layer inhabitants confirms that grit in the food supply was substantially reduced, reinforcing the dietary explanation.
Empirical confirmation of the predicted effect directly validates the causal explanation.

Key Concept

Strengthening an argument by providing empirical confirmation of an expected outcome or unstated assumption.
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 12Question →

An archival library installed ultraviolet-filtering window film in its main exhibition gallery to safeguard historical manuscripts displayed in open showcases. Curators observed that over the six months following the installation, the rate of ink fading on the exhibited manuscripts slowed considerably compared to prior records. The curators concluded that the installation of the ultraviolet-filtering film was the direct cause of the decreased ink fading. Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the curators' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Similar historical manuscripts displayed in an identical adjacent gallery that received the same amount of sunlight, but had no protective window film installed, showed no reduction in ink fading over the same six-month period.

Answer

The argument is most strengthened by the finding that identical manuscripts in an adjacent gallery without the protective film experienced no reduction in ink fading during the same period.
The curators conclude that the ultraviolet-filtering film caused the reduction in manuscript ink fading. Providing evidence from a control scenario—where identical manuscripts in a room with identical sunlight exposure but no film did not see any reduction in fading—rules out external confounding factors such as seasonal light shifts, thereby strongly supporting the curators' causal conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premises and conclusion in the stimulus
Premise: Ultraviolet-filtering window film was installed in an exhibition gallery, after which ink fading on displayed manuscripts decreased noticeably. Conclusion: The window film was directly responsible for the reduction in ink fading.
Understanding the precise causal claim is essential for determining what evidence would make that claim more likely to be true.
2
Analyze the underlying logical gap
The argument assumes that the reduction in ink fading was caused by the window film rather than by seasonal changes in sunlight, changes in interior lighting, or other environmental shifts.
Strengthening a causal conclusion typically requires ruling out confounding factors or demonstrating a consistent correlation where the cause is absent.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement that validates the causal mechanism
Providing a control group—showing that similar manuscripts under the same sunlight conditions without the film did not experience reduced fading—rules out general seasonal or sunlight variations.
Demonstrating that the effect does not occur in the absence of the cause (control condition) directly bolsters the causal inference.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Arguments via Control Comparisons
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 13Question →

Consider the following argument:

Ecologist: In a controlled municipal study, urban green roofs planted exclusively with native sedum species supported a 40 percent higher abundance of native bees than roofs planted with non-native sedum species. Because both groups of roofs had identical total floral surface area and were situated in identical urban microclimates, the higher bee abundance on native sedum roofs must be driven primarily by the superior nutritional quality of native sedum nectar.

Statement: If native bees show no difference in visual attraction to the flower morphology and coloration of native versus non-native sedum species, this finding strengthens the ecologist's conclusion.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The conclusion asserts a specific causal mechanism (nectar nutritional quality) to explain a documented correlation (higher bee abundance on native sedum roofs). The supplementary statement demonstrates that visual floral traits (coloration and morphology) do not differ in their appeal to the bees. By eliminating visual attraction as an alternative explanation for why bees congregate on native sedums, the statement provides meaningful logical reinforcement for the author's nectar-quality hypothesis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument's premises and conclusion
Premise: Native sedum roofs had 40% more native bees despite equal floral surface area and identical microclimates. Conclusion: The preference must be driven primarily by superior nectar nutritional quality.
Identifying the explicit evidence and the exact causal claim reveals the logical gap.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and potential rival causes
The ecologist assumes that non-nutritional factors (such as flower shape, color, or visual attractiveness) do not explain the disparity in bee abundance.
Causal arguments on the LSAT are vulnerable to alternative explanations that could produce the same correlation.
3
Evaluate the impact of the supplementary statement
Confirming that bees do not differ in visual attraction to flower morphology eliminates visual cues as a confounding variable.
Ruling out a plausible alternative explanation directly bolsters the validity of the author's favored causal mechanism.

Key Concept

Strengthening a causal conclusion by eliminating a plausible alternative explanation
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 14Question →

The following arguments each rely on unstated assumptions to establish a causal conclusion. Match each argument with the evidentiary finding that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

An ecologist argues that a mid-sixth-century drought caused a documented spike in catastrophic wildfires, relying on tree-ring data showing low precipitation and concurrent sediment charcoal deposits.
A behavioral economist concludes that symbolic achievement motives alone drove an 18% shift to off-peak subway travel, based on a trial using an app with digital badges and milestone points but no monetary incentives.
A botanist argues that betalain pigment accumulation in desert succulents functions primarily as a physiological shield against ultraviolet radiation damage, noting that pigments only form under intense UV exposure.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Match the ecologist's wildfire argument with the estuarine sediment finding showing charcoal spikes restricted to drought decades; match the behavioral economist's transit argument with the control trial showing no shift from an information-only app; and match the botanist's pigment argument with the mutant succulent finding showing cellular DNA damage in the absence of betalain.
Each correct match directly resolves the unique causal vulnerability of the paired argument. The ecologist's argument is strengthened by estuarine data that rules out continuous anthropogenic fire as a confounding factor; the transit study is strengthened by a control group showing information alone was insufficient without gamification; and the botanical claim is strengthened by demonstrating that eliminating the pigment results in UV-induced DNA damage.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the reasoning structure and identify the central vulnerability in the ecologist's wildfire argument.
The ecologist infers that drought caused ancient wildfires based solely on temporal coincidence, leaving open the possibility that human land management or independent fire sources caused the charcoal spikes.
Strengthening a causal conclusion requires ruling out alternative explanations or demonstrating consistent covariation between the purported cause and the effect.
2
Analyze the reasoning structure and identify the central vulnerability in the behavioral economist's transit argument.
The economist assumes that symbolic gamification caused the off-peak shift, failing to control for whether the app's underlying scheduling and timing information was the true factor enabling the commuters to reschedule.
A valid strengthener must isolate the causal variable by demonstrating that the effect disappears when the gamification incentive is removed while other features remain constant.
3
Analyze the reasoning structure and identify the central vulnerability in the botanist's pigment argument.
The botanist infers that betalain acts as a protective UV shield because it appears under UV exposure, leaving open whether the pigment is merely an unprotective stress byproduct.
Strengthening requires establishing a direct functional mechanism linking the absence of the substance to the specific physiological harm it is hypothesized to prevent.
4
Match each argument to the finding that directly resolves its specific logical gap.
The wildfire argument matches the estuarine sediment data (ruling out non-drought human burning), the transit argument matches the information-only control group (isolating the badge incentives), and the succulent argument matches the DNA degradation in mutant strains (confirming the protective mechanism of betalain).
Each correct pairing provides the targeted empirical support needed to substantiate the specific unstated causal assumption.

Key Concept

Identifying unstated causal assumptions and pairing them with evidentiary findings that eliminate alternative explanations or isolate causal variables.
Question 15Question →

Match each logical argument on the left with the supplementary premise on the right that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Paleontologist: Juvenile fossil specimens of the herbivore Dicynodon exhibit dental micro-striations identical to those caused by consuming silica-rich wetland horsetails, whereas adult specimens lack these striations. Therefore, juvenile Dicynodon inhabited riparian wetlands while adults lived in arid uplands.
Neurologist: Patients with chronic insomnia who listened to low-frequency binaural acoustic tones for thirty minutes before sleep experienced forty percent fewer nocturnal awakenings than a control group listening to white noise. Thus, low-frequency acoustic stimulation directly induces synchronized cortical delta waves during sleep.
Agronomist: Crop plots treated with mycorrhizal fungal inoculants produced twenty-five percent higher grain yields under moderate drought than untreated plots. Because fungal hyphae expand root surface area, this yield advantage was entirely due to enhanced water uptake efficiency.
Art Historian: Infrared reflectography of a disputed Renaissance portrait reveals an underdrawing executed in carbon ink with fluid hatching unique to Master V. Because workshop apprentices were strictly required to use dry charcoal, Master V himself must have drawn this underdrawing.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Match the paleontology argument with the premise regarding horsetail ecological restriction and enamel wear retention; match the neurology argument with the premise confirming EEG delta-wave surges and equal subjective relaxation; match the agronomy argument with the premise involving the nutrient-defective mutant fungal strain; match the art history argument with the premise establishing locked ink storage and restricted sketch access.
Each correct pairing resolves the specific inferential vulnerability present in the respective argument. The paleontology argument is strengthened by confirming that horsetails were exclusively riparian and that adult teeth would have preserved juvenile striations. The neurology argument is strengthened by objective electroencephalogram verification of delta-wave synchronization and control of relaxation variables. The agronomy argument is strengthened by experimental isolation proving that non-water fungal contributions were not responsible for the yield increase. The art history argument is strengthened by confirming that apprentices had zero access to carbon ink and that copyists could not have accessed the preparatory sketches.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the reasoning gap in the paleontology argument
The argument concludes that habitat segregation caused the wear difference, assuming adults did not simply overwrite juvenile wear and that horsetails only grew in wetlands.
Strengthening requires validating the environmental restriction of horsetails and ensuring tooth wear persistence across life stages.
2
Analyze the reasoning gap in the neurology argument
The argument concludes that sound waves specifically triggered cortical delta waves based solely on reported awakenings, assuming awakenings were not reduced via general relaxation or placebo effects.
Strengthening requires direct physiological confirmation of delta-wave activity and ruling out general relaxation.
3
Analyze the reasoning gap in the agronomy argument
The argument attributes the entire yield benefit to water uptake, assuming the fungus provided no other drought-mitigating benefits such as enhanced phosphorus or mineral uptake.
Strengthening requires isolating water uptake from mineral nutrition mechanisms.
4
Analyze the reasoning gap in the art history argument
The argument concludes Master V drew the underdrawing based on the medium and style, assuming apprentices never obtained ink and outside copyists could not replicate the style.
Strengthening requires establishing strict exclusivity of ink access and stylistic privacy.

Key Concept

Strengthening Deductive and Causal Inferences by Ruling Out Rival Hypotheses and Confirming Necessary Mechanisms
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 16Question →

Forestry researcher: In high-elevation pine forests, stands treated with mechanical thinning showed a significantly lower rate of bark beetle infestations over a three-year observation period than adjacent untreated stands. Because thinning increases the spacing between trees, thereby increasing sunlight penetration and reducing tree competition for soil moisture, the researcher concluded that reduced water stress directly enhanced the trees' physiological capacity to produce defensive resin against beetles.

Statement: The finding that elevated wind speeds in thinned forest stands physically disperse and dilute the aggregation pheromones used by bark beetles to coordinate mass attacks strengthens the forestry researcher's conclusion.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: False

Answer

False
The statement is false because the supplementary finding acts as a weakener rather than a strengthener. In causal arguments, introducing an alternative mechanism (wind disrupting beetle communication) that fully explains the observed effect (lower infestation rates) undermines the author's specific conclusion that the effect was produced by enhanced resin defenses resulting from reduced water stress.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Thinned stands had lower beetle infestation rates and reduced tree competition for water. Conclusion: Reduced water stress directly enhanced the trees' physiological capacity to produce defensive resin against beetles.
To evaluate whether supplementary evidence strengthens an argument, one must isolate the author's exact causal mechanism rather than just the general outcome.
2
Analyze the logical impact of the supplementary finding on the posited causal relationship.
The supplementary finding demonstrates that higher wind speeds in thinned stands disrupt beetle pheromones, which directly reduces beetle attacks without involving tree resin or water stress.
Determining whether new information supports or undermines the specific link between the stated cause (resin from reduced water stress) and effect (fewer infestations).
3
Determine whether introducing an alternative causal pathway strengthens the argument.
Introducing a competing, independent cause for the observed correlation weakens the author's claim that resin defense was the active cause.
An alternative explanation for the observed correlation undermines the author's proposed causal mechanism, making the statement that it strengthens the conclusion false.

Key Concept

Causal Strengthening and Alternative Explanations in Logical Reasoning
Question 17Question →

A wildlife conservation team observed that a local population of river otters experienced a substantial increase in breeding success shortly after commercial fisheries in the river basin switched from traditional nylon nets to a newly designed biodegradable netting. The team concluded that the transition to biodegradable netting was directly responsible for the rebound in the otter population.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the conservation team's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Veterinary post-mortem examinations revealed that prior to the switch, entanglement in traditional nylon netting was the leading cause of mortality among breeding-age otters in the river basin.

Answer

The statement showing that entanglement in traditional nylon netting was the leading cause of death among breeding-age otters prior to the switch most strongly strengthens the conclusion.
The conclusion asserts a direct causal relationship between the new netting and the increase in otter breeding success. By establishing that traditional nylon nets were previously the primary cause of death among breeding-age otters, the correct statement provides evidence of the specific mechanism of harm that was eliminated by the switch, thereby strongly reinforcing the causal conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument.
Premise: Otter breeding success increased after fisheries switched to biodegradable netting. Conclusion: The switch to biodegradable netting directly caused the otter population rebound.
Clarifying the core reasoning helps identify the unstated assumption linking the correlation to direct causation.
2
Identify the reasoning gap in the causal claim.
The author assumes that traditional netting was actively harming breeding otters and that no other concurrent factors caused the recovery.
A strengthener must either demonstrate the causal mechanism or rule out plausible alternative causes.
3
Evaluate the choices to find the statement that best supports the causal link.
Providing physical evidence that traditional nets were directly killing breeding otters establishes the causal mechanism and validates the conclusion.
Showing that the old netting directly impeded breeding-age survival directly connects the policy change to the observed demographic increase.

Key Concept

Strengthening a Causal Argument
Question 18Question →

Historians studying a nineteenth-century coastal port observed that merchant shipping logs recorded a sharp decrease in shipwrecks near a treacherous submerged reef following the construction of a lighthouse in 1842. Based on this correlation, the historians concluded that the beam from the new lighthouse was directly responsible for the reduction in wrecks by warning navigators away from the hazard.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the historians' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The total volume of shipping traffic passing near the submerged reef remained constant or slightly increased in the years immediately following 1842.

Answer

The statement showing that shipping traffic near the reef remained steady or increased after 1842 most strengthens the argument.
The argument concludes that the lighthouse beam caused the decrease in shipwrecks. However, a major alternative explanation for fewer shipwrecks is a general decline in the number of ships traveling near the reef. Establishing that shipping traffic stayed constant or increased rules out this rival hypothesis, confirming that the reduction in wrecks was due to improved navigational guidance.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises in the stimulus.
Premise: Shipwrecks near a reef declined after a lighthouse was built in 1842. Conclusion: The lighthouse caused the decline by warning navigators away from the reef.
Understanding the core causal claim is essential for determining what logical gap needs reinforcement.
2
Analyze the potential vulnerabilities and unstated assumptions in the causal reasoning.
The author assumes that no other factor, such as a drop in total vessel traffic near the reef, accounted for the decline in recorded shipwrecks.
Strengthening a causal conclusion often involves ruling out plausible alternative causes or confirming that baseline conditions did not change.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the statement that best supports the causal link.
Confirming that ship traffic remained steady or increased eliminates the competing hypothesis of reduced traffic, thereby confirming that the rate of wrecks per voyage genuinely declined due to the warning beam.
Ruling out an obvious confounding variable directly substantiates the proposed causal connection.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Claims by Ruling Out Alternative Explanations
Question 19Question →

Paleoclimatologist: Speleothems (mineral deposits such as stalagmites) in a highland cavern preserve distinct annual layers with oxygen isotope ratios (δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O}) that fluctuate in response to rainfall. Analysis of a stalagmite spanning the eleventh to thirteenth centuries reveals a pronounced forty-year interval of highly enriched δ18O\delta^{18}\text{O} values, indicative of diminished local precipitation. Because historical agricultural annals from the adjacent low-lying river valley record widespread crop failures and village abandonment during this identical forty-year window, researchers conclude that a prolonged regional drought caused the abandonment of these agrarian settlements.

Statement: The finding that drought-sensitive teak trees throughout the adjacent river valley exhibited an unprecedented suppression in annual growth-ring widths during the same forty-year interval logically strengthens the paleoclimatologist's conclusion.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True. The supplementary finding provides independent corroborating evidence that the drought conditions extended into the agricultural valley, reinforcing the causal explanation for the village abandonments.
Evaluating the statement as True is correct because the paleoclimatologist's argument hinges on extrapolating a localized physical proxy (stalagmite isotope ratios from one highland cave) to an entire agricultural region. Providing independent biological evidence of growth suppression in drought-sensitive trees located throughout the farming valley validates the assumption of regional drought and eliminates the alternative hypothesis of an isolated cavern microclimate.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument to identify premises, conclusion, and logical gaps.
Premises establish that a highland cavern stalagmite showed 40 years of reduced rainfall and that valley annals recorded crop failures at the same time. The conclusion claims that regional drought caused the village abandonments. The reasoning gap is the unproven assumption that the highland cave's rainfall deficit reflected broad regional conditions affecting the valley.
Identifying the gap between localized proxy data and a broad regional conclusion is required to evaluate potential strengtheners.
2
Assess the impact of the supplementary statement on the identified gap.
The statement demonstrates that drought-sensitive trees across the lowland valley also suffered severe growth reduction during the exact same 40-year period, confirming that drought conditions were indeed widespread in the farming zone.
A premise strengthens an argument when it provides independent corroboration or rules out alternative explanations such as localized microclimatic bias.
3
Determine the truth value of the evaluation.
Because the supplementary finding directly strengthens the conclusion by bridging the spatial and environmental gap, the statement is True.
Concludes the formal evaluation of the true/false diagnostic.

Key Concept

Strengthening a causal conclusion by providing independent proxy corroboration that eliminates localized alternative explanations.
Question 20Question →

Historian: In fourteenth-century southern Germany, the acute shortage of mature oak timber used for municipal bridge and cathedral construction was historically attributed by chroniclers to the Great Famine and the Black Death, which supposedly decimated the skilled labor force needed to manage and fell old-growth stands. However, recent dendroclimatological analyses of preserved river revetments indicate that between 1310 and 1345, the region experienced unprecedented multi-year periods of severe spring flooding and saturated soils. Oak taproots are uniquely vulnerable to fatal fungal root rot when submerged for extended periods, which halts trunk maturation and induces premature dieback. Therefore, climatically driven tree mortality, rather than a demographic labor collapse, was the primary cause of the structural timber deficit.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the historian's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In neighboring alpine valleys that experienced comparable population losses during the mid-fourteenth century but whose steep terrain prevented prolonged soil saturation, municipal records show that supplies of mature structural oak remained stable.

Answer

The statement demonstrating that neighboring regions with comparable population losses but no soil waterlogging maintained stable structural oak supplies most strengthens the argument.
The correct answer provides a robust comparative control group. By demonstrating that an adjacent region with the same demographic decline (the rival cause) but without soil saturation (the proposed cause) experienced no timber deficit (the effect), it shows that demographic collapse alone was insufficient to cause the shortage. This eliminates the primary competing explanation and reinforces the claim that climatically driven waterlogged soils caused the crisis.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument and identify premises and the main conclusion.
Premises establish that severe spring flooding occurred between 1310 and 1345, and that oak taproots suffer lethal fungal rot in waterlogged soil. The conclusion asserts that climate-driven tree mortality, rather than labor demographic collapse from famine and plague, was the primary cause of the oak deficit.
Isolating the conclusion allows us to pinpoint the core causal competition between climatically driven tree mortality and labor collapse.
2
Identify the reasoning gap and formulate a strengthening strategy.
The author must rule out the plausible rival hypothesis (labor shortages) or provide comparative evidence showing that the presence of waterlogging, rather than the presence of demographic collapse, correlates directly with the shortage.
In causal arguments that dismiss an established alternative explanation, demonstrating that the alternative explanation alone does not produce the effect strongly validates the proposed cause.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to locate the statement that best bridges this gap.
The control scenario showing that alpine valleys with identical demographic loss but well-drained soils experienced no timber shortage effectively isolates soil saturation as the necessary factor for the deficit, ruling out labor loss as the primary cause.
This comparative control group eliminates the primary competing explanation.

Key Concept

Causal strengthening through isolation of variables and control group comparison
Estimated Time:1m 45s
Page 1 / 4Next
Strengthen Practice Questions — LSAT | Examkin