Strengthen

75 questions

Question 41Question →

Paleoclimatologist: Deep-sea core samples from the subpolar Southern Ocean reveal sediment strata from approximately 430,000 years ago containing concurrent spikes in windborne mineral dust and dense accumulations of fossilized Fragilariopsis diatoms. Because bioavailable iron is a documented limiting nutrient for phytoplankton in these waters, researchers concluded that episodic increases in atmospheric dust deposition directly triggered massive surface diatom blooms during that glacial epoch.

Statement: The researchers' conclusion is strengthened if geochemical analysis demonstrates that during the periods when these strata formed, deep-sea bottom currents were not vigorous enough to laterally transport mineral grains and diatom microfossils from distant shallow shelves into the sampling basin.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True: Ruling out the lateral transport of minerals and microfossils by deep ocean currents eliminates a plausible rival explanation, thereby substantiating the claim that the sediment spike reflects local surface diatom blooms stimulated by atmospheric iron deposition.
The conclusion asserts a specific causal relationship: airborne iron dust triggered local surface diatom blooms. The sediment data is consistent with this hypothesis, but it is also consistent with an alternative scenario in which deep currents aggregated materials from distant regions. Showing that bottom currents could not have transported these materials eliminates this counter-explanation, thereby strengthening the argument's central causal claim.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's premises and central conclusion
Premises: Deep-sea sediment cores exhibit simultaneous peaks in windborne mineral dust and fossilized diatom density, and iron is a limiting nutrient in the region. Conclusion: Episodic airborne iron dust deposition directly caused local surface diatom blooms.
Deconstructing the argument isolates the evidentiary basis from the causal inference.
2
Examine the logical gap and identify potential rival hypotheses
The author assumes that the physical accumulation of dust and fossils at the sampling site accurately reflects local surface productivity rather than post-mortem lateral transport from elsewhere by ocean currents.
Strengtheners frequently operate by eliminating unstated alternative explanations that could account for the observed evidence without the author's proposed cause.
3
Evaluate the logical effect of the proposed statement
Confirming that deep bottom currents were insufficient to transport sediment from distant shelves rules out lateral advection, reinforcing the inference of local in situ biological production.
Eliminating a major competing explanation strengthens the validity of the primary causal conclusion, making the statement logically true.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Inferences by Eliminating Alternative Hypotheses
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 42Question →

Economist: To reduce grid strain during heatwaves, a regional power authority enrolled thousands of households in an automated demand-response program that remotely raises home thermostat settings by 2∘C2^\circ\text{C} during peak afternoon hours, unless a resident manually cancels the adjustment. Although fewer than 15 percent of enrolled households ever overrode the automated adjustments, peak-hour residential electricity consumption across the region fell by only 3 percent, far below the 14 percent reduction predicted by thermodynamic engineering models. Several critics conclude that the engineering models severely overestimated the energy savings of a 2∘C2^\circ\text{C} temperature increase. However, the models were likely accurate; the shortfall is almost certainly attributable to behavioral pre-cooling, in which residents manually set their thermostats several degrees lower than normal in the late morning before the peak period begins.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the economist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Enrolled households that consistently refrained from lowering their thermostat settings in the late morning experienced peak-hour electricity reductions that closely matched the 14 percent projected by the models.

Answer

The statement showing that enrolled households that refrained from lowering late-morning thermostat settings achieved peak-hour electricity reductions matching the 14 percent projection most strongly supports the economist's argument.
The economist defends the accuracy of the engineering models against critics by proposing an alternative causal explanation: behavioral pre-cooling in the late morning caused the observed peak-hour shortfall. The finding that enrolled households that did not pre-cool in the late morning realized energy savings that matched the 14 percent projection acts as a crucial control comparison. It proves that the engineering calculations were sound when applied to households with normal pre-peak baseline temperatures, directly substantiating the economist's attribution of the aggregate shortfall to the pre-cooling behavior.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument and identify the conclusion and premises.
Premises: An automated 2°C increase during peak hours yielded only a 3% drop in electricity use despite an 85%+ non-override rate, whereas engineering models projected 14%. Conclusion: The models were accurate; the discrepancy was caused by resident pre-cooling in the late morning rather than inherent model flaws.
Strengthening an argument requires pinpointing the exact causal gap between the evidence (the shortfall) and the author's explanation (behavioral pre-cooling vs. model error).
2
Evaluate the underlying assumption and identify what would substantiate the causal attribution.
The economist assumes that when the pre-cooling behavior is absent, the model's projected 14% savings will actually manifest, proving that the model itself was sound.
A standard method to strengthen a causal claim is to demonstrate that in the absence of the hypothesized cause (pre-cooling), the expected outcome under the model occurs (the predicted 14% drop).
3
Match the identified requirement to the answer choices.
The finding that households that did not pre-cool achieved reductions matching the predicted 14% confirms the validity of the model and ties the shortfall directly to the presence of pre-cooling.
This control comparison eliminates the rival hypothesis (flawed thermodynamic models) and confirms the causal link asserted by the economist.

Key Concept

Causal Validation via Control Group Comparison
Estimated Time:1m 35s
Question 43Question →

Economist: To mitigate extreme strain on the regional power grid during summer heatwaves, an energy authority introduced dynamic surge pricing for commercial manufacturers between 1:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. Over the subsequent summer, total peak-period electricity drawn from the grid by these manufacturers fell by 22 percent, while their overall production volume remained unchanged. Therefore, the surge pricing policy successfully motivated manufacturers to shift energy-intensive production activities to off-peak nighttime and morning hours.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the economist's conclusion?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Electricity consumption by the commercial manufacturers during late-night and early-morning hours increased by an amount roughly equal to their peak-period reduction.

Answer

The argument is most strongly supported by the finding that manufacturers increased their off-peak electricity consumption by an amount comparable to the reduction in peak-period usage.
The conclusion asserts a specific operational mechanism: manufacturers maintained production while lowering peak grid consumption by shifting heavy work to off-peak hours. The finding that electricity usage rose during early-morning and late-night periods in proportion to the peak-period decrease provides direct confirmation that power-intensive tasks were rescheduled to those hours.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the stimulus argument structure
Premises: Peak-hour grid electricity draw by manufacturers dropped 22%, but total production stayed constant. Conclusion: The price surge caused manufacturers to reschedule energy-heavy processes to off-peak morning and evening hours.
Identifying premises and the conclusion isolates the logical gap between observed lower peak grid consumption and the specific claimed behavioral cause (temporal rescheduling).
2
Identify potential gaps and rival hypotheses
The manufacturers could have achieved lower grid demand without shifting hours—for example, by running on-site generators, implementing real-time peak efficiencies, or outsourcing energy-intensive steps.
To strengthen an argument with a causal claim, one must either corroborate the proposed mechanism or rule out plausible alternative explanations.
3
Evaluate the credited choice against the reasoning gap
Showing an offsetting rise in electricity consumption during early morning and late-night hours directly demonstrates that energy consumption was indeed transferred to those specific off-peak periods.
Corroborating the complementary increase in off-peak consumption directly validates the author's hypothesized mechanism.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal reasoning by verifying the predicted mechanism
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 44Question →

Match each of the following arguments with the supplementary finding that provides the strongest logical support for its stated conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Archaeologists conclude that ceramic vessels excavated at an inland plateau settlement were imported from distant river valleys rather than manufactured locally, since the mineral profile of the clay matches deposits located two hundred kilometers away.
Botanists conclude that the sudden die-off of a perennial desert shrub across an arid basin was caused by a newly introduced fungal pathogen rather than a concurrent drought, since the die-off occurred first and most severely in the basin's wettest subregions.
Historians conclude that a monumental inscription discovered at an ancient port city was commissioned by visiting seafaring merchants rather than the local governing council, since the text incorporates counting glyphs identical to those used exclusively in overseas island registries.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Each argument matches the finding that addresses its primary evidential gap: the ceramic argument matches the trace mineral absence in local clay beds; the botanical argument matches the spore germination requirements and drought tolerance; and the historical inscription argument matches the council's prohibition against foreign glyphs.
For the pottery argument, ruling out local clay composition directly reinforces the conclusion of importation. For the botanical argument, demonstrating that the pathogen thrives in moisture while the shrub resists drought confirms pathogen causality over drought. For the epigraphic argument, showing that local rulers were legally prohibited from using foreign glyphs supports foreign merchant commissioning.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and inferential gap in each argument on the left.
The ceramic argument assumes local clay could not have produced the pottery; the botanical argument assumes the wet-area pattern aligns with disease rather than drought; the epigraphic argument assumes local authorities would not use foreign counting symbols.
Strengthening an argument requires finding a premise that eliminates alternative explanations or substantiates an unstated assumption.
2
Evaluate the findings on the right to match each with the specific logical gap it bridges.
The absence of local clay trace compounds rules out local manufacturing; the moisture requirement and drought resistance confirm the pathogen mechanism over drought; the native orthography decree rules out local council authorship.
Each correct match provides direct support specifically tailored to the causal vulnerability of the corresponding stimulus.

Key Concept

Strengthening logical arguments by eliminating alternative explanations, verifying causal mechanisms, and validating necessary assumptions.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 45Question →

Marine Archaeologist: Bronze artifacts recovered from seventeenth-century shipwrecks often suffer rapid corrosion known as 'bronze disease' when exposed to atmospheric oxygen and humidity. In a recent preservation trial, conservators submerged several newly excavated bronze cannons in a sodium sesquicarbonate solution for six months. Following the treatment, none of the submerged cannons developed active bronze disease during two years of atmospheric exposure. The conservators concluded that the sodium sesquicarbonate wash effectively leaches destructive cuprous chlorides out of ancient bronze, thereby preventing post-excavation corrosion.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the conservators' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Untreated bronze cannons recovered from the same shipwreck and stored in the exact same atmospheric conditions developed active bronze disease within four months of excavation.

Answer

Untreated bronze cannons recovered from the same shipwreck and stored in the exact same atmospheric conditions developed active bronze disease within four months of excavation.
The correct response provides an essential experimental control by demonstrating that identical bronze cannons from the same wreck corroded quickly when left untreated under identical storage conditions. This confirms that the test environment was conducive to bronze disease and strongly supports the conclusion that the chemical wash was the causal mechanism preventing deterioration.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument structure
Premises establish that newly excavated bronze cannons submerged in sodium sesquicarbonate showed no bronze disease for two years. The conclusion asserts that the chemical wash caused this preservation by leaching destructive chlorides.
Identifying the premises and conclusion isolates the causal gap between the observed outcome and the attributed cause.
2
Identify the logical vulnerability
The argument lacks a control group; without knowing what would have happened without the wash, the absence of disease could be due to low atmospheric humidity, inherent artifact resistance, or chance.
Strengthening a causal conclusion often requires establishing a controlled comparison or eliminating alternative explanations.
3
Evaluate the strengthening impact of the correct choice
Showing that untreated cannons from the same site under identical atmospheric conditions rapidly corroded confirms that the corrosion trigger was present and that the wash was responsible for preventing the reaction.
A valid control group directly reinforces the causal link between the intervention and the successful preservation outcome.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Claims via Control Comparison
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 46Question →

Archaeologist: Recent excavations at a Middle Pleistocene hominin campsite recovered over two thousand stone cutting flakes. Microscopic analysis of the strike platforms revealed that approximately 88 percent display asymmetric curvature characteristic of intentional detachment by a right-handed knapper. In modern humans, population-level right-handedness reflects left-hemispheric cerebral lateralization—a neural architecture critical for syntactic language. Therefore, these findings indicate that hominins at this site had already evolved left-hemispheric neural specialization linked to linguistic capability.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the archaeologist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Spatial mapping and stratigraphic analysis demonstrate that the stone flakes were deposited across multiple occupation layers created by dozens of distinct individuals over several centuries.

Answer

The statement demonstrating that the stone flakes were produced by dozens of distinct individuals across multiple centuries most strongly supports the conclusion.
The archaeologist infers species-level or population-level brain lateralization from a sample of 2,000 flakes. The argument is vulnerable to the possibility that these artifacts represent the output of a single prolific right-handed individual. Showing that the flakes were manufactured by dozens of distinct individuals over multiple centuries confirms that right-handedness was a pervasive cultural and biological norm in this population, thereby strongly bolstering the conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument's premises and conclusion
Premise 1: 88% of 2,000 flakes show right-handed knapping curvature. Premise 2: In modern humans, population-level right-handedness corresponds to left-hemisphere lateralization essential for syntax. Conclusion: These hominins possessed left-hemispheric neural specialization linked to language.
Deconstructing the core reasoning reveals the critical gap between observing asymmetric flakes in an archaeological sample and inferring true population-level neurological lateralization.
2
Identify the primary reasoning vulnerability
The 2,000 flakes could have been produced by just one or two idiosyncratic right-handed knappers, which would not demonstrate population-level handedness across the hominin group.
Strengthening a causal or inductive generalization requires confirming that the sample is representative of the population rather than an isolated outlier.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement that closes this gap
Establishing that the flakes were deposited across centuries by dozens of separate individuals validates that the 88% frequency represents widespread, population-wide handedness.
Eliminating the sampling objection directly substantiates the premise that population-level lateralization existed.

Key Concept

Validating population-level representativeness to substantiate evolutionary and neurological inferences
Estimated Time:1m 45s
Question 47Question →

Geochemists analyzing vapor plumes venting from the fracture zones of an icy satellite observed elevated concentrations of molecular hydrogen and methane. Laboratory simulations establish that while hydrothermal serpentinization reactions produce abundant hydrogen, the abiotic reduction of dissolved carbon dioxide into methane proceeds far too slowly under the moon's inferred core temperatures to yield the observed methane concentrations. On this basis, the researchers conclude that biological methanogenesis by chemoautotrophic microorganisms in the sub-surface ocean is the primary source of the plume methane.

True or False: The finding that primordial methane trapped in sub-surface clathrate hydrates during the satellite's initial accretion would have completely decomposed and outgassed within the first billion years of the solar system's formation logically strengthens the researchers' conclusion.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The claim is True because ruling out the persistence of primordial methane reservoirs eliminates a major alternative abiotic explanation, directly bolstering the inference that active microbial methanogenesis is responsible for the detected plume composition.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Isolate the argument's core premises and conclusion
Premises establish that real-time abiotic synthesis of methane via serpentinization is kinetically hindered at ambient temperatures; Conclusion infers that chemoautotrophic microbes are producing the methane.
Accurate structural breakdown identifies the evidential basis and the scope of the author's causal claim.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and logical vulnerability
The argument assumes that if methane cannot be synthesized abiotically in the present day, it must have a modern biological origin, overlooking passive abiotic origins such as legacy primordial reserves.
Strengthen questions frequently target unaddressed rival explanations for an observed physical phenomenon.
3
Assess the logical impact of the supplementary finding
Confirming that primordial clathrates completely dissipated billions of years ago rules out ancient accretionary storage as the source of current plume emissions.
Eliminating a competing non-biological mechanism increases the probability that the active biological mechanism is correct, thereby strengthening the argument.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal arguments by eliminating alternative non-biological hypotheses
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 48Question →

Municipal Administrator: In an effort to curb residential water waste during peak summer drought conditions, the city of Oakvale installed automated smart flow-meters in every home across District 4. Simultaneously, District 4 households were transitioned to a tiered pricing structure that imposed sharply higher per-gallon rates for usage exceeding a basic threshold. Over the following year, residential water consumption in District 4 decreased by 18 percent, whereas consumption in neighboring District 5, which retained flat-rate pricing and standard mechanical meters, remained unchanged. Therefore, the implementation of tiered pricing was the primary cause of the reduction in water waste in District 4.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the municipal administrator's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: In an earlier municipal pilot program in District 4, installing automated smart flow-meters while maintaining the traditional flat-rate billing system resulted in no measurable decline in household water consumption.

Answer

The statement establishing that deploying smart meters alone without tiered pricing yielded no measurable decrease in water use.
The conclusion asserts a specific causal relationship: tiered pricing caused the reduction in water waste. Because the city implemented two changes simultaneously (smart meters and tiered pricing), a major vulnerability of the argument is that the smart meters themselves might have caused the reduction. The correct answer provides control data showing that installing smart meters alone under flat-rate pricing had no effect on water consumption. By eliminating this competing causal explanation, the argument attributing the reduction to tiered pricing is significantly strengthened.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument
Premises: District 4 received two simultaneous changes (smart meters and tiered pricing) and experienced an 18% drop in water use; District 5 had neither change and no drop. Conclusion: Tiered pricing was the primary cause of the reduction in District 4.
Deconstructing the argument into premises and conclusion is essential for identifying reasoning gaps.
2
Identify the primary logical vulnerability or assumption
The author assumes that the tiered pricing, rather than the simultaneous introduction of smart flow-meters or an unmentioned confounding factor, produced the observed 18% conservation.
When two potential causes are introduced simultaneously, attributing the effect entirely to one requires demonstrating that the other cause is not solely responsible.
3
Evaluate which supplementary statement best bridges the gap
Evidence demonstrating that smart meters in isolation did not reduce consumption effectively rules out the competing technological explanation, leaving pricing as the dominant operative cause.
Ruling out an alternative explanation directly increases the probability that the author's proposed cause is correct.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Eliminating Confounding Variables
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 49Question →

Match each of the following research arguments with the supplementary finding that most effectively strengthens its causal conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Marine biologists observe that coastal inlets with resident sea otter populations maintain substantially denser kelp canopies than inlets without otters. They conclude that sea otter predation on herbivorous sea urchins directly preserves kelp forest density.
Forest managers observe that pine stands subjected to periodic low-intensity prescribed burns experienced significantly less crown fire destruction during a severe drought than unmanaged stands. They conclude that prescribed burning directly reduces the vulnerability of pine canopies to catastrophic fire.
Linguists observe that regional dialect terms among commercial merchant sailors rapidly converged into a uniform nautical vocabulary following the publication of standardized naval manuals. They conclude that the naval manuals directly drove vocabulary standardization across the commercial fleet.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The marine biology argument matches the finding regarding identical inlet conditions and monitored otter reintroduction; the forestry management argument matches the finding regarding identical slope/age controls and ladder fuel elimination; the historical linguistics argument matches the finding regarding mandatory naval manual training and stable land-based dialects.
Each correct pairing provides crucial supportive evidence for its respective argument: the sea otter argument is strengthened by controlling for abiotic water conditions and demonstrating causal temporal priority; the forestry argument is strengthened by ruling out topographical bias and confirming the physical fuel pathway; and the linguistics argument is strengthened by proving exposure to the manuals while using land-based trades as a negative control.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the primary causal claim and potential reasoning gap in each argument on the left.
The otter argument assumes no confounding water differences and a direct trophic cascade; the forestry argument assumes burned stands did not simply have better natural topography; the linguistics argument assumes merchant sailors actually engaged with naval manuals rather than undergoing an independent cultural shift.
Strengthening a causal conclusion requires identifying unstated assumptions, confirming mechanisms, or ruling out alternative explanations.
2
Evaluate the supplementary findings on the right to match each with the specific gap it resolves.
The finding regarding inlet environmental controls and chronological reintroduction specifically resolves the otter argument's gap; the finding detailing ladder fuels and slope controls directly validates the prescribed burning mechanism; the finding specifying mandatory guild training and land-based controls directly connects merchant sailors to naval manuals.
A valid strengthener directly bridges the analytical gap between the observed correlation and the asserted cause.
3
Verify that each match is uniquely supportive and cannot be misapplied.
Each right-hand statement addresses the distinct domain, mechanism, and counter-hypothesis of its corresponding left-hand argument.
Ensures precise, one-to-one logical pairing without ambiguity.

Key Concept

Causal strengthening via ruling out confounding variables, establishing mechanism transmission, and providing appropriate control baselines.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 50Question →

Historical Linguist: Dialect surveys across the Appalachian Mountain region reveal that grammatical features characteristic of seventeenth-century West Country English have persisted in isolated valley communities for generations. Anthropologists have traditionally attributed this linguistic preservation to extreme geographic isolation that prevented exposure to standard lowland dialects. However, recently uncovered municipal ledgers indicate that these valley settlements engaged in frequent, extensive commercial trade with major urban trading centers throughout the nineteenth century. Thus, the preservation of the traditional dialect was primarily driven by the community's active use of speech as a marker of shared social identity, rather than by an absence of linguistic exposure.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the historical linguist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Nineteenth-century personal journals and merchant correspondence indicate that valley residents were fully proficient in standard lowland English when conducting trade in urban markets, but consistently reverted to their traditional dialect upon returning to their local settlements.

Answer

The finding that valley residents demonstrated full proficiency in standard lowland English during external trade yet deliberately chose to speak their traditional dialect within their home community.
The correct response provides direct, empirical evidence of code-switching among valley residents. By showing that community members were fully proficient in standard lowland English in commercial settings but selectively maintained their traditional dialect within their home settlement, it proves that the preservation of archaic grammatical structures was not caused by a lack of linguistic knowledge or exposure, but rather by an intentional choice to signal local cultural belonging and in-group identity.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument structure, premises, and conclusion
Premises: Traditional view claimed dialect preservation was caused by lack of exposure due to geographic isolation; new evidence proves frequent, extensive trade contact occurred with urban centers throughout the nineteenth century. Conclusion: Dialect preservation was driven by its function as an active marker of social identity rather than an absence of exposure.
Identifying the conclusion and the gap between 'having trade contact' and 'intentionally using language as an identity marker' is necessary to locate the required support.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and potential logical vulnerabilities
The author assumes that trade contact actually produced personal linguistic exposure/proficiency among residents and that the continued use of the traditional dialect was a deliberate social choice rather than a reflection of imperfect learning or insular trade practices.
A strengthener must supply evidence confirming that speakers had access to the standard dialect but selectively maintained the traditional dialect in community contexts.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to find the statement providing the most impactful support
Evidence of code-switching—showing that valley residents mastered standard English for urban commerce but consciously used the heritage dialect in their local community—directly establishes that exposure existed and that dialect retention was an intentional social identity marker.
This bridges the gap between commercial contact and intentional cultural preservation, verifying the linguist's central thesis.

Key Concept

Strengthening an Argument by Providing Evidence of Deliberate Behavioral Choice (Code-Switching) to Support an Identity-Based Causal Explanation
Question 51Question →

Match each of the following arguments with the supplementary finding that most effectively strengthens its central conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Marine Biologist: Nearshore corals exposed to estuarine sediment plumes suffered substantially less thermal bleaching during a recent heatwave than offshore corals in clear waters, despite both experiencing identical peak water temperatures. Thus, suspended sediment particles shielded nearshore corals from intense solar radiation, mitigating thermal bleaching.
Aviation Analyst: Air traffic sectors that implemented a redesigned automated tracking interface experienced a 40 percent decline in near-miss incidents over six months. Therefore, the interface's dynamic visual alerts directly enhanced controllers' speed and accuracy in resolving flight path conflicts.
Agronomist: In field trials conducted during severe drought conditions, wheat inoculated with a specialized fungal endophyte produced 25 percent higher grain yields than non-inoculated control crops. Hence, the inoculant confers drought resilience primarily by stimulating cellular osmotic regulation rather than by expanding the root network.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Each argument matches the supplementary premise that eliminates alternative causal explanations and isolates the hypothesized mechanism: the marine biologist's argument matches the controlled shading and filtration finding; the aviation analyst's argument matches the component-isolation finding; and the agronomist's argument matches the finding ruling out root expansion while confirming osmoprotectant increases.
Each pair correctly matches an argument with evidence that specifically addresses its primary logical gap. The coral argument requires evidence that sediment shading—rather than inherent physiological differences in nearshore populations—mitigated bleaching, which is established by the artificial shading and filtration trials. The aviation argument requires isolating the visual alert feature from external factors such as traffic volume or other interface changes, which the ablation test provides. The crop argument requires demonstrating that root morphology did not change while cellular osmoprotectants increased, confirming the hypothesized physiological pathway.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze each argument's conclusion and underlying logical gap.
Argument 1 presumes sediment shading rather than native genetic tolerance explains coral survival; Argument 2 presumes visual alerts rather than general system changes or lower traffic density caused fewer aviation incidents; Argument 3 presumes biochemical osmotic regulation rather than deeper water extraction via root expansion drove crop yields.
Strengthening an argument requires identifying the unstated assumption or potential competing hypothesis and evaluating which supplementary evidence resolves that vulnerability.
2
Evaluate the evidentiary mechanism provided in each supplementary finding.
The first finding uses control trials to isolate shading as both necessary and sufficient for protection; the second finding controls for traffic volume and conducts an ablation test on visual alerts; the third finding measures root parameters directly to eliminate the anatomical hypothesis while verifying the biochemical mechanism.
A valid strengthener must establish a direct causal link or rule out plausible rival explanations.
3
Pair each specific argument with its corresponding validating evidence.
Estuary coral argument pairs with the mesocosm solar shading trial; aviation interface argument pairs with the alert ablation and traffic stability data; wheat endophyte argument pairs with the root invariance and osmolyte concentration data.
Each supplementary finding targets and resolves the exact causal gap present in its respective argument.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal and mechanistic arguments on the LSAT by ruling out alternative explanations and confirming the specific operational mechanism.
Estimated Time:2m 30s
Question 52Question →

Ecologist: Wild populations of the desert shrub *Larrea* produce volatile terpenes in their root zones. Although researchers once hypothesized that these subterranean terpenes primarily suppress the germination of competing plant species, recent field assays show that natural soil concentrations of the compounds are far too low to inhibit seed germination. However, *Larrea* specimens growing in soils with elevated terpene concentrations exhibit significantly less foliar tissue desiccation during prolonged droughts than do specimens in terpene-deficient soils. Given that terpene molecules are known to chemically bond with and thicken waxy cuticular layers on plant surfaces, the subterranean terpene vapor must rise into the canopy and directly reduce foliar water loss by reinforcing the leaves' cuticular wax.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the ecologist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: When the aboveground foliage of *Larrea* shrubs is physically shielded from rising soil vapors while their roots remain in terpene-rich soil, the shrubs exhibit rates of leaf water loss identical to those of shrubs growing in terpene-deficient soil.

Answer

The statement showing that shielding the foliage from rising vapors while keeping roots in terpene-rich soil eliminates the drought benefit most strengthens the argument.
The ecologist argues for a specific physical pathway: subterranean terpene vapor travels upward into the canopy and directly reinforces leaf cuticles to prevent water loss. A major vulnerability of this argument is that terpenes could instead function below ground (for example, by altering root water absorption or soil properties). The finding that physically blocking vapors from reaching the canopy eliminates the drought benefit—even when the roots remain in terpene-rich soil—proves that foliar exposure to the vapor is necessary for reduced water loss. This isolates the ecologist's proposed mechanism and rules out subterranean alternative explanations, providing the strongest support for the conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument's structure and identify the core conclusion.
The ecologist concludes that subterranean terpene vapor rises into the canopy and directly reduces foliar water loss by reinforcing the cuticular wax of the leaves.
Identifying the precise conclusion and its proposed mechanism is necessary to evaluate which premise gap must be supported.
2
Identify the reasoning gap and potential alternative explanations.
The correlation between terpene-rich soil and reduced drought desiccation could be caused by alternative mechanisms, such as root absorption of terpenes or enhanced soil moisture retention, rather than vapors acting directly on the canopy foliage.
Strengthening a causal conclusion often requires isolating the specific causal pathway or ruling out competing explanations.
3
Evaluate the impact of isolating the aboveground vapor pathway.
Showing that blocking the vapor from reaching aboveground foliage causes the drought benefit to disappear—despite root exposure to terpenes—confirms that foliar contact with the vapor is essential and rules out subterranean alternative mechanisms.
This directly validates the proposed causal link between rising vapor and foliar protection.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Hypotheses via Mechanism Isolation and Ruling Out Competing Causes
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 53Question →

Ecologist: Over the past decade, several metropolitan municipalities replaced standard high-pressure sodium streetlights with broad-spectrum white light-emitting diodes (LEDs). Following this transition, researchers documented a 45 percent drop in local nocturnal moth populations. The researchers concluded that the transition to broad-spectrum LEDs caused this decline, reasoning that the higher proportion of blue wavelengths emitted by white LEDs disrupts nocturnal insect navigation.

Statement: The finding that adjacent rural nature reserves retaining high-pressure sodium streetlights experienced stable moth populations over the same ten-year period strengthens the ecologist's argument.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
The claim is true because providing evidence that an adjacent, comparable area lacking the proposed cause (white LEDs) did not exhibit the observed effect (moth decline) functions as an effective control. This substantially mitigates the possibility that general environmental or ecological confounders drove the decline, thereby strengthening the causal connection.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Deconstruct the argument into premises and conclusion
Premise 1: Municipalities swapped sodium streetlights for broad-spectrum white LEDs. Premise 2: Local moth populations dropped 45 percent. Premise 3: White LEDs emit blue wavelengths known to disrupt nocturnal navigation. Conclusion: The transition to white LEDs caused the moth population decline.
Isolating the core conclusion and supporting evidence is essential for identifying the logical gap in causal arguments.
2
Identify the reasoning vulnerability
The argument assumes a correlation equals causation and assumes that unmeasured regional factors (e.g., weather patterns, habitat loss, pesticides) were not responsible for the population drop.
Strengthening a causal conclusion typically requires eliminating alternative causes, demonstrating control conditions, or reinforcing the proposed mechanism.
3
Evaluate the impact of the supplementary statement
Showing that nearby populations in environments without the LED transition remained stable acts as a control, making widespread regional confounders less plausible and raising the likelihood that the municipal LED installations were indeed the primary cause.
Demonstrating that the effect does not occur when the suspected cause is absent provides direct inductive support for the causal claim.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Claims via Control Comparison
Estimated Time:1m 0s
Question 54Question →

Economist: To encourage retirement savings, several mid-sized firms replaced their opt-in retirement plans with an automatic enrollment system featuring a default employee contribution rate of 3 percent of gross salary. Five years after implementation, overall employee participation rose from 42 percent to 88 percent. Nonetheless, financial analysts argue that this policy change reduced the overall median retirement wealth accumulated by participating employees by retirement age. They reason that under the opt-in system, the self-selected participants chose an average contribution rate of 7 percent, whereas the vast majority of employees enrolled under the automatic system never actively adjusted their contribution rate above the 3 percent default.

Statement: The finding that workers enrolled under the automatic system are significantly less likely to open or contribute to supplementary individual retirement accounts than were workers under the opt-in system provides logical support for the financial analysts' conclusion.

Show answer & explanation

Answer: True

Answer

True
Evaluating the statement as True is correct because the analysts' argument relies on the assumption that employees anchored to the lower default contribution rate of 3 percent did not compensate by saving through other retirement channels. Demonstrating that automatically enrolled workers were even less likely to fund external supplementary retirement accounts closes this gap, eliminating a major counter-explanation and strengthening the claim that overall median retirement wealth was reduced.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument and identify the conclusion and premises
The financial analysts conclude that replacing the opt-in plan with automatic enrollment at a 3 percent default rate reduced overall median retirement wealth accumulation for participating employees. The premise is that automatic enrollment anchored the vast majority of participants at a 3 percent contribution rate, compared to a 7 percent average under the opt-in system.
Accurately identifying the author's precise conclusion and reasoning gap is required before evaluating any strengthening claim.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and potential inferential vulnerabilities
The argument assumes that lower internal plan contribution percentages translate directly into lower overall retirement wealth, implicitly assuming that workers under the automatic system did not make up the difference through other savings vehicles (such as external IRAs or personal investment accounts).
Strengthening statements in logical reasoning often eliminate alternative explanations or validate unstated assumptions.
3
Assess the logical impact of the supplementary statement
The statement provides empirical evidence that workers under the automatic system did not compensate via outside accounts and were in fact less likely to use supplementary individual retirement accounts. This rules out the compensatory savings hypothesis and solidifies the link between the 3 percent default inertia and reduced overall retirement wealth.
A finding that closes an inferential gap and eliminates a counter-hypothesis provides valid logical support for the conclusion.

Key Concept

Strengthening an Argument by Eliminating an Alternative Explanation
Question 55Question →

Match each of the following research arguments with the supplementary finding that most strongly strengthens its conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Geochemist: Drill cores from ancient glacial ice sheets show a sharp spike in sulfur dioxide aerosols coinciding with a mass cooling event 40,000 years ago. Therefore, massive volcanic eruptions must have triggered this sudden cooling.
Cognitive Scientist: Bilingual adults who regularly translate between distinct language families exhibit significantly higher working memory resilience in late adulthood than monolinguals. Thus, the active mental effort of language switching protects against age-related cognitive decline.
Urban Planner: After a municipality replaced fixed-route suburban buses with on-demand microtransit shuttles, commuter satisfaction ratings increased by 35 percent. Thus, the introduction of flexible routing is what improved residents' view of suburban transit.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

The geological argument matches the discovery of volcanic ash shards linking sulfur spikes to eruptions; the cognitive science argument matches the baseline testing that eliminates pre-existing memory advantages; and the urban planning argument matches the constancy of fares and travel times that rules out confounding factors.
Each match correctly identifies the piece of evidence that reinforces the specific causal attribution made in the argument: confirming the volcanic origin of the chemical marker strengthens the paleoclimate claim, establishing baseline cognitive equivalence across groups strengthens the language-switching claim, and ruling out extraneous transit service improvements strengthens the microtransit claim.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the central claim and logical gap in each argument on the left.
The first argument assumes sulfur spikes came from volcanoes; the second assumes translation caused better memory rather than pre-existing differences; the third assumes flexible routing drove satisfaction rather than other service changes.
Strengthening an argument requires identifying unstated assumptions or unaddressed alternative explanations.
2
Evaluate the findings on the right to see which statement addresses each argument's specific vulnerability.
Volcanic ash confirms the volcanic source for the ice core argument; pre-translation baseline equality eliminates selection bias for the cognitive study; unchanging fares and amenities rule out extraneous variables for the transit study.
A valid strengthener either confirms a necessary causal link or rules out a prominent alternative hypothesis.
3
Pair each argument with its corresponding strengthening evidence.
All three pairs are uniquely and unambiguously aligned based on their causal mechanisms and subject matter.
Matching each premise-conclusion gap with its precise evidentiary bridge completes the required pairing.

Key Concept

Strengthening an argument by providing direct corroborating evidence, eliminating selection bias, or controlling for confounding variables.
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Question 56Question →

Paleoclimatologist: Sediment core samples extracted from Lake Sylvan reveal a dramatic spike in charcoal microparticles around 850 CE, closely accompanied by a sharp decline in pollen from old-growth oak forests and an influx of pioneer scrub vegetation. Although many historians attribute this abrupt ecological transformation to widespread land-clearing by early agrarian migrants, it is more likely that a severe, multi-decade regional drought sparked extensive natural wildfires that reshaped the landscape.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the paleoclimatologist's hypothesis?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Sediment cores extracted from several remote, uninhabitable alpine tarns across the same climatic region exhibit the identical pattern of charcoal deposition and forest retreat dating to 850 CE.

Answer

The statement showing that identical sediment patterns occurred simultaneously in uninhabited alpine tarns within the same climatic region provides the strongest support.
The paleoclimatologist argues that the 850 CE charcoal spike and vegetation shift were caused by a widespread climate phenomenon (severe regional drought causing wildfires) rather than localized human clearing. The statement showing that remote, uninhabited alpine lakes in the same climate region underwent the exact same charcoal and forest transition at 850 CE strongly strengthens this conclusion. Because humans were absent from those alpine locations, human agriculture could not have caused the changes there, demonstrating that a regional, non-anthropogenic factor such as drought was the true common cause.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the argument's premises, conclusion, and underlying gap
Premise: Sediment cores show a charcoal spike and forest-to-scrub transition at 850 CE. Rival claim: Human agricultural land-clearing caused it. Paleoclimatologist's conclusion: A multi-decade regional drought caused natural wildfires that drove the change.
Strengthening an argument that rejects an alternative causal explanation requires finding evidence that either rules out the rival cause or validates the proposed environmental mechanism.
2
Evaluate the impact of demonstrating the phenomenon in human-free environments
If remote, uninhabited lakes in the same climatic zone display identical charcoal spikes and forest retreat at the exact same time, the transition cannot be attributed to human agricultural activity.
Ruling out the rival explanation (human land-clearing) across a broader regional scope substantially increases the likelihood that a shared regional climate event (drought) was the primary driver.
3
Eliminate distractors that weaken, use unwarranted extremes, or address irrelevant biological traits
The correct choice is uniquely supportive, whereas other options introduce opposing evidence, overly broad absolutes, or irrelevant mechanisms.
Ensures that only the uniquely credited answer choice is selected under timed assessment criteria.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Arguments by Ruling Out Alternative Causes
Question 57Question →

Acoustic engineer: Open-plan emergency departments frequently experience high ambient noise levels, which have been suspected of contributing to cognitive fatigue and medication administration errors among triage nurses. To address this, a metropolitan hospital installed specialized sound-dampening acoustic baffles and absorbent wall panels throughout its emergency ward. Over the subsequent six months, the recorded rate of medication administration errors in that ward dropped by 35 percent. Thus, the physical reduction of ambient noise was directly responsible for the decrease in medication errors.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the acoustic engineer's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: During the six months following the installation, the emergency department underwent no modifications to its nurse staffing ratios, shift durations, or medication dispensing protocols.

Answer

During the six months following the installation, the emergency department underwent no modifications to its nurse staffing ratios, shift durations, or medication dispensing protocols.
The acoustic engineer draws a causal conclusion—that physical noise reduction caused a drop in medication errors—based on an observed correlation over a six-month period. A major logical vulnerability in such arguments is the potential presence of confounding variables that could alternatively explain the improvement. The statement confirming that staffing ratios, shift durations, and dispensing protocols remained unchanged eliminates prominent rival causes, thereby substantially strengthening the conclusion that the acoustic panels were responsible for the drop in error rates.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the argument's premises and conclusion
Premises: Acoustic panels were installed in the emergency department, and medication errors dropped by 35% over the next six months. Conclusion: The reduction of ambient noise was directly responsible for the decrease in errors.
Isolating the core reasoning reveals that the author infers causation solely from a chronological correlation.
2
Analyze the logical gap and potential vulnerabilities
The primary vulnerability in this causal argument is the possibility that other simultaneous changes (confounding variables) occurred during the six-month period and actually caused the decline in errors.
Strengthening a causal conclusion often involves eliminating plausible rival hypotheses or confounding factors.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the statement that best supports the causal link
Confirming that staffing ratios, shift lengths, and dispensing protocols remained unchanged rules out major alternative explanations, directly bolstering the causal claim.
Eliminating alternative explanations increases the probability that the physical noise reduction was the true cause.

Key Concept

Strengthening causal claims by ruling out alternative explanations and confounding variables
Estimated Time:1m 15s
Question 58Question →

Agronomist: Traditional drip irrigation systems deliver water directly to crop root zones at ground level, but in arid climates, substantial water is lost to surface evaporation during high-temperature periods. A newly designed sub-surface capillary system delivers water 15 centimeters beneath the soil surface. In a multi-year trial conducted in an arid valley, tomato fields utilizing the sub-surface system required 25 percent less water to produce the same crop yield as fields using traditional drip irrigation. Therefore, converting farms throughout the arid valley to the sub-surface system will substantially reduce the valley's overall agricultural water consumption. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the agronomist's argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: The crop varieties that account for most of the agricultural land in the valley have root structures and water uptake characteristics similar to those of tomatoes.

Answer

The statement that the crop varieties accounting for most cultivated land in the valley share root structures and water uptake characteristics with tomatoes most strongly strengthens the argument.
The conclusion claims that converting farms throughout the entire valley will substantially reduce total agricultural water use, based solely on evidence from a trial on tomato fields. For this conclusion to hold, the efficiency gains seen in tomatoes must apply broadly across the valley's agriculture. The correct answer confirms that the vast majority of agricultural land in the valley is planted with crops whose root depth and water uptake properties resemble those of tomatoes, establishing that the 25 percent savings demonstrated in the trial are representative of the region as a whole.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the conclusion and premises of the argument
Premise: Sub-surface capillary irrigation saved 25% water in tomato trials relative to traditional drip systems. Conclusion: Converting farms across the entire arid valley to this system will substantially reduce total agricultural water consumption.
Isolating the core claim reveals the inductive leap between a specific trial on tomatoes and valley-wide agricultural impact.
2
Locate the logical gap or unstated assumption
The author assumes that the water savings observed specifically in tomato fields will generalize to the other major crops cultivated across the valley.
If tomatoes have unique root depths that benefit from sub-surface watering while other valley crops do not, the overall water reduction would not materialize.
3
Evaluate which statement bridges the gap and provides the strongest support
Confirming that the predominant crops in the valley share similar root and water uptake traits with tomatoes validates the sample's representativeness and secures the conclusion.
Strengthening the generalizability of a sample to a broader population directly substantiates the author's causal projection.

Key Concept

Sample Generalizability and Eliminating Representativeness Gaps in Causal Arguments
Estimated Time:1m 20s
Question 59Question →

Match each logical argument with the supplementary finding that most strongly strengthens its conclusion.

Click a left item, then click its matching right item

Items

Ecologist: In alpine meadows, high-elevation bumblebee populations declined by 40% following the introduction of managed honeybee hives, despite ample floral nectar throughout the season. Because direct physical aggression between species was absent, the decline was likely caused by honeybees transmitting novel pathogens to the native bumblebees.
Urban Planner: After the city converted two central traffic lanes into dedicated rapid-bus corridors, average vehicle commuting times across downtown decreased by 12%. Because total downtown vehicle volume remained unchanged, the dedicated bus lanes must have improved general traffic flow efficiency by reducing lane-switching disruptions.
Art Conservator: Renaissance oil paintings lined with rye-flour paste exhibit significantly less canvas embrittlement over four centuries than those lined with animal-hide glue. Because both adhesives offer comparable moisture resistance, the rye-flour paste must actively inhibit structural degradation by chemically neutralizing acidic paint breakdown products.

Matches

Show answer & explanation

Answer

Argument 1 (Ecologist) pairs with the finding regarding adjacent valley bumblebee colonies maintaining stable health without introduced hives; Argument 2 (Urban Planner) pairs with the finding identifying pre-conversion bus lane merging as the main source of corridor congestion; Argument 3 (Art Conservator) pairs with the finding confirming that rye-flour paste possesses an alkaline buffer that neutralizes linseed oil acids.
Each correct pairing provides crucial evidential support tailored to the specific causal hypothesis of the argument: establishing an unconfounded control group for the pollinator decline, confirming the pre-existing cause of delay for the traffic intervention, and experimentally demonstrating the proposed chemical buffering mechanism for the canvas adhesive.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the core reasoning and unstated gaps in each argument.
Identified three distinct causal claims: pathogen transmission as the mechanism of pollinator decline, elimination of bus lane-switching as the cause of transit efficiency, and chemical acid neutralization as the preservative mechanism in canvas lining.
Strengthening requires identifying the exact causal link or mechanism hypothesized by each speaker.
2
Evaluate the supplementary findings to identify which premise provides targeted support for each specific causal mechanism.
Matched the control group validation to the pollinator argument, the bottleneck confirmation to the transit argument, and the direct biochemical verification to the art conservation argument.
A valid strengthener either confirms the proposed mechanism, provides control evidence ruling out confounders, or corroborates the underlying assumption.
3
Verify that no supplementary finding cross-applies inappropriately or fails to address the specific conclusion.
Each pair establishes a uniquely relevant evidentiary bridge between premises and conclusion.
Ensures mutual exclusivity and rigorous logical validity across all pairings.

Key Concept

Strengthening Causal Arguments and Validating Mechanisms
Estimated Time:1m 45s
Question 60Question →

Archaeologist: Smelting slag recovered from the Bronze Age coastal settlement of Karystos contains significant concentrations of manganese oxide. Because copper ore deposits at nearby Mount Oche naturally contain manganese, researchers have concluded that the copper smelted at Karystos came from Mount Oche rather than being imported from the Cycladic islands.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the researchers' argument?

Show answer & explanation

Answer: Copper ores from the Cycladic islands mined during the Bronze Age contain no detectable traces of manganese.

Answer

Copper ores from the Cycladic islands mined during the Bronze Age contain no detectable traces of manganese.
The argument concludes that copper smelted at Karystos came from Mount Oche instead of the Cycladic islands based solely on the fact that Karystos slag contains manganese oxide and Mount Oche ore contains manganese. For this chemical signature to support Mount Oche over the Cyclades, Cycladic ores must not share the same manganese characteristic. Establishing that Cycladic ores contained no detectable manganese rules out the possibility that imported Cycladic ore produced the observed slag, thereby substantially strengthening the researchers' conclusion.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the structure of the argument and identify the conclusion and premises.
Conclusion: The copper smelted at Karystos came from Mount Oche rather than being imported from the Cycladic islands. Premise: Slag at Karystos contains manganese oxide, and Mount Oche copper ore naturally contains manganese.
Isolating the premises and conclusion clarifies the logical gap between observed evidence and the author's causal claim.
2
Identify the unstated assumption and potential alternative explanations.
The argument assumes that Cycladic ore could not have produced the manganese-rich slag, and that manganese was not introduced via other means.
To strengthen an exclusive attribution to Mount Oche, a statement must either validate that manganese uniquely identifies Mount Oche ore or eliminate the Cycladic competitor hypothesis.
3
Evaluate the answer choices to identify the option that provides the strongest logical support.
The statement showing that Cycladic ores lack manganese establishes that Cycladic ores could not account for the manganese oxide in the slag, directly reinforcing the conclusion.
Eliminating the alternative source of copper ore provides strong evidential support for the local source.

Key Concept

Ruling out alternative causal sources to strengthen an attribution argument
PreviousPage 3 / 4Next
Strengthen Practice Questions — LSAT — Page 3 | Examkin