Examkin

Question

Difficulty: Very hardClient Rights and Advocacy

An adult client whose primary language is not English is scheduled for a below-the-knee amputation. The surgeon previously obtained the signed informed consent utilizing a certified medical interpreter. As a practical nurse (PN) prepares to administer an ordered preoperative sedative, the client becomes tearful, points to the leg, and states in broken English, 'No cut leg, only toes.' The unit charge nurse tells the PN, 'The consent is already legally signed. Just review the paperwork with the client and administer the medication.' Which action by the PN demonstrates appropriate client advocacy?

  1. A
    Accept the charge nurse's delegated task to independently assess the client's comprehension of the signed consent form.
  2. B
    Utilize a facility-approved language translation device to explain the correct anatomical extent of the surgery.
  3. Delay the administration of the sedative and insist that the surgeon evaluate the client's current understanding of the procedure.Answer
  4. D
    Reassure the client that the surgical team is highly experienced and that the signed document ensures the correct operation.

Answer

The priority advocacy action is to delay the administration of the sedative and insist that the surgeon evaluate the client's current understanding of the procedure.
The correct action demonstrates client advocacy by protecting the client's right to informed consent. When a client expresses a fundamental misunderstanding of a scheduled surgery, their previous consent is invalidated. The practical nurse (PN) must act as a client advocate by withholding any preoperative sedatives—which would alter the client's cognition—and immediately notifying the provider. Furthermore, the PN must recognize that the charge nurse's directive is an inappropriate delegation; assessing comprehension of complex medical procedures and clarifying surgical risks are outside the PN's legal scope of practice. Only the performing provider can clarify the procedure.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the client's statement
The client's statement ('No cut leg, only toes') indicates a complete misunderstanding of the scheduled below-the-knee amputation.
Identifying knowledge deficits is the first step in recognizing that informed consent has been compromised.
2
Determine the legal and ethical implications
A signed piece of paper does not override the client's current lack of comprehension. The client cannot give legally binding informed consent without understanding the true anatomical extent of the surgery.
Informed consent is an ongoing process of understanding, not just a signature on a form.
3
Evaluate the charge nurse's directive
The charge nurse's order to 'review the paperwork' and administer the sedative requires the PN to assess comprehension and perform primary teaching, which is outside the PN scope of practice.
The PN must refuse inappropriate delegation that endangers the client or violates legal scopes of practice.
4
Select the appropriate advocacy intervention
The PN must withhold the preoperative sedative (which would impair the client's ability to consent) and escalate the issue directly to the provider.
Only the healthcare provider who is performing the procedure can legally provide primary education and clarify the surgical details.

Key Concept

Client Advocacy and Scope of Practice in Informed Consent
Rate this question

Topics

Client Rights and Advocacy

More questions from this topic