Examkin

Question

Difficulty: HardInformed Consent

A client is in the preoperative preparation unit awaiting a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The nurse enters the room to administer the prescribed pre-anesthetic midazolam. The client suddenly states, "Wait, the surgeon mentioned a risk of retrograde ejaculation, but I do not understand what that means for me." Place the following nursing actions in the correct priority order from first to last.

  1. 1Withhold the administration of the prescribed pre-anesthetic midazolam.
  2. 2Ask open-ended questions to clarify the specific extent of the client's knowledge deficit.
  3. 3Contact the urologist to return to the unit to explain the procedural risks.
  4. 4Document the client's knowledge deficit and the delayed medication administration in the electronic health record.
  5. 5Witness the client's signature on the surgical consent form.

Answer

The correct sequence prioritizes legal competency and safety by first withholding the sedative, then assessing the concern, notifying the provider, documenting the events, and finally witnessing the consent.
When a client expresses uncertainty or a lack of understanding about a procedure, any previously implied or partial consent is suspended. The nurse's absolute first priority is client safety and legal protection, which requires withholding any preoperative sedatives (like midazolam) that would alter cognitive function and legally prevent the client from providing informed consent. Next, the nurse applies the nursing process by assessing the specific nature of the knowledge deficit. Because explaining primary surgical risks and complications is outside the RN scope of practice, the nurse must then notify the provider to return and re-educate the client. After these immediate, critical actions are taken, the nurse documents the events. The final step is witnessing the consent signature, which can only occur after the provider has answered all questions and the nurse verifies the client is ready, informed, and cognitively intact.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Withhold the administration of the prescribed pre-anesthetic midazolam.
The client remains cognitively intact and legally competent.
Administering a sedative before obtaining valid informed consent legally invalidates any subsequent signature and violates client rights.
2
Ask open-ended questions to clarify the specific extent of the client's knowledge deficit.
The nurse identifies the exact nature of the client's confusion regarding retrograde ejaculation.
The nurse must assess the situation thoroughly to provide an accurate SBAR (Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation) report to the healthcare provider.
3
Contact the urologist to return to the unit to explain the procedural risks.
The provider responsible for the procedure addresses the medical knowledge deficit.
Explaining surgical risks, benefits, and alternatives is strictly within the provider's scope of practice, not the registered nurse's.
4
Document the client's knowledge deficit and the delayed medication administration in the electronic health record.
A legal record of the delay in consent and the rationale for withholding prescribed medications is created.
Accurate and timely documentation is legally required after the immediate safety and collaborative interventions are complete.
5
Witness the client's signature on the surgical consent form.
The informed consent process is completed legally and ethically.
The nurse can only witness the signature after confirming the client has received the necessary information from the provider, understands it, and remains unmedicated.

Key Concept

Informed Consent: RN Scope of Practice and Prioritization
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question

Topics

Informed Consent

More questions from this topic