Text 1
Planetary protection protocols for Mars missions are excessively conservative, relying on the premise that terrestrial microbes could easily propagate on the Martian surface. Given the sterilizing ultraviolet radiation, extreme aridity, and pervasive perchlorates in the soil, the likelihood of Earth organisms surviving—let alone proliferating—is negligible. Consequently, the high costs of sterile assembly processes unnecessarily hinder space exploration.
Text 2
It is true that Mars's surface is highly hostile to life. However, subterranean environments present a different scenario. Terrestrial endolithic bacteria, which inhabit the interiors of rocks, have demonstrated survival in simulated Martian subsurface conditions. Since upcoming missions aim to drill deep into the Martian regolith to search for biosignatures, ignoring the risk of introducing subterranean contaminants could permanently compromise future astrobiological discoveries.
Based on the passages, how would the author of Text 2 most likely respond to the claim in Text 1 that the sterilization of Mars-bound spacecraft is an unnecessary expense?
- ABy claiming that the extreme aridity and perchlorates on the Martian surface are actually less hostile than Text 1 suggests.
- BBy asserting that the high costs of sterile assembly are justified because terrestrial endolithic bacteria have already been detected on Mars.
- By arguing that terrestrial microbes pose a contamination risk to Martian subterranean environments, which are more hospitable than the surface environments discussed in Text 1.Answer
- DBy suggesting that planetary protection protocols should focus on preserving surface regolith rather than drilling sites.