Question

Difficulty: EasyCross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis

Text 1
Many botanists have long asserted that the development of agriculture in Mesoamerica was initiated solely by the domestication of maize. According to this traditional view, the high caloric yield of early maize varieties provided the necessary food surplus that allowed nomadic hunter-gatherers to establish permanent settlements. Consequently, other local plant species are viewed as minor additions that were only domesticated long after maize agriculture was already well established.

Text 2
Archaeologist Dr. Elena Ruiz argues that the focus on maize overlooks the crucial role of squash. Ruiz points out that archaeological remains of domesticated squash seeds in Mesoamerica date back to 8000 BCE, nearly two thousand years before the earliest evidence of domesticated maize. Thus, Ruiz contends that squash domestication, rather than maize, was the initial catalyst for the transition to sedentary agricultural life in the region.

Based on the texts, is the statement that the author of Text 2 agrees with the traditional view presented in Text 1 regarding which plant species initiated Mesoamerican agriculture true or false?

Answer: Answer

Answer

False
The statement is false because the author of Text 2 proposes a timeline and catalyst (squash domestication starting around 8000 BCE) that directly contradicts the traditional view in Text 1 (which claims agriculture was initiated solely by maize).

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Analyze the claim in Text 1.
Text 1 describes a traditional view asserting that agriculture in Mesoamerica was initiated solely by maize domestication.
To understand the viewpoint that the statement refers to.
2
Analyze the claim in Text 2.
Text 2 introduces the argument of Dr. Elena Ruiz, who asserts that squash domestication, rather than maize, was the initial catalyst.
To compare this new viewpoint with the traditional view in Text 1.
3
Synthesize the relationship and evaluate the statement.
Since Text 2 presents an opposing theory (squash instead of maize as the catalyst), the author of Text 2 does not agree with the traditional view. The statement of agreement is therefore false.
To determine the final truth value of the evaluated statement.

Key Concept

Cross-Text Connections: Relational Synthesis
Rate this question