Question

Difficulty: MediumCross-Text Connections: Perspective Comparison

Text 1
For decades, some archaeologists have argued that the geoglyphs of the Nazca Desert were constructed primarily as a giant astronomical calendar. According to this view, the straight lines and trapezoidal figures align with the rising and setting points of key celestial bodies, such as the Sun during solstices and specific stars associated with agricultural cycles. Proponents of this celestial alignment hypothesis suggest that the Nazca people mapped their cosmology onto the landscape to track seasonal changes, thereby coordinating planting and harvesting schedules vital to their survival in an arid environment.

Text 2
Conversely, recent archaeological research suggests that the Nazca geoglyphs served a ritual and ceremonial purpose related to water and fertility rather than astronomy. Excavations have revealed ceremonial offerings, such as shells and pottery, at the intersections of the lines. Furthermore, spatial analyses demonstrate that the vast majority of the geoglyphs do not exhibit significant celestial alignments. Instead, the pathways lead toward sacred hills or rivers, suggesting they were processed along by ritual participants praying for rain. Thus, the lines were likely holy paths constructed to appeal to deities controlling water resources.

Based on the texts, how would the author of Text 2 most likely characterize the "celestial alignment hypothesis" presented in Text 1?

  1. A
    As a plausible model that complements the ritual pathway theory by explaining the timing of agricultural ceremonies.
  2. As a conjecture that fails to align with the spatial data and artifactual evidence associated with the majority of the geoglyphs.Answer
  3. C
    As a compelling argument that correctly identifies the primary ecological challenges faced by the Nazca civilization.
  4. D
    As an outdated theory that has been definitively disproven by the discovery of written records tracking the Nazca agricultural cycles.

Answer

The correct answer is the option stating that the hypothesis is a conjecture failing to align with spatial data and artifactual evidence.
The correct answer is correct because the author of Text 2 outlines two main points of evidence: spatial analyses showing that the vast majority of lines do not align with celestial objects, and excavations showing pottery and shell offerings at intersections. These findings directly challenge the premise of the astronomical calendar hypothesis, leading the author of Text 2 to view it as an unsupported assertion that does not fit the physical reality of the site.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core claim of Text 1.
Text 1 presents the hypothesis that the Nazca geoglyphs functioned as an astronomical calendar to track seasons for agriculture.
This establishes the target perspective that the author of Text 2 will react to.
2
Analyze the counterarguments and evidence presented in Text 2.
Text 2 argues that the geoglyphs served a water-related ritual purpose. It supports this with evidence showing that most lines do not have celestial alignments (spatial analysis) and that physical offerings were found at line intersections (artifactual evidence).
Understanding the evidence in Text 2 allows us to determine how its author would evaluate the astronomical claim.
3
Determine the relationship between the two perspectives.
Because the author of Text 2 uses data to show a lack of alignment and point to a ritual purpose, they would view Text 1's hypothesis as a speculation that contradicts the physical and spatial findings.
This leads directly to the correct characterization without relying on literal sentence matching.

Key Concept

Cross-Text Connections: Perspective Comparison
Estimated Time:1m 30s
Rate this question