In the mid-twentieth century, historians frequently characterized the transition of the Roman Empire from a pagan to a Christian state as a sudden, disruptive revolution engineered by imperial decree. However, recent scholarship by historians such as Peter Brown suggests a more nuanced reality. Brown argues that Christianization was not an abrupt rupture but rather a slow process of cultural synthesis, in which Christian concepts were gradually translated into the existing vocabulary of classical paganism. According to this view, pagan intellectual structures and civic institutions were not violently dismantled; instead, they were repurposed and absorbed. This model of transformation emphasizes continuity over catastrophe, indicating that the transformation of the late antique world was marked by mutual adaptation rather than unilateral suppression.
Which choice best states the main idea of the text?
- APagan intellectual structures and civic institutions in the Roman Empire were preserved because the early Christian church lacked the political power to dismantle them.
- Recent historical scholarship suggests that the Christianization of the Roman Empire was a gradual process of cultural integration rather than an abrupt, violent rupture.Answer
- CMid-twentieth-century historians focused exclusively on the role of imperial decrees in shaping the religious landscape of the late Roman Empire.
- DThe transition of the Roman Empire from a pagan to a Christian state is a prime example of how major civilizations undergo structural transformations.