Edward Forbes proposed the azoic hypothesis in 1843, asserting that marine life could not exist below 300 fathoms (about 550 meters) due to extreme pressure and lack of light. This hypothesis became a dominant paradigm, guiding oceanographic expectations for decades. However, subsequent deep-sea dredging expeditions, most notably the HMS Challenger expedition in the 1870s, consistently recovered diverse organisms from depths far exceeding Forbes's limit. While Forbes's specific hypothesis was ultimately disproved, its formulation was crucial; by establishing a falsifiable limit, it galvanized systematic deep-sea exploration and prompted researchers to investigate the physiological adaptations that enable organisms to survive in seemingly hostile benthic environments.
Which choice best states the main purpose of the text?
- ATo trace how technological advancements have changed oceanographers' understanding of deep-sea ecosystems.
- To show how a scientific hypothesis, despite being incorrect, ultimately promoted the development of deep-sea exploration.Answer
- CTo detail the specific marine organisms recovered by the HMS Challenger expedition.
- DTo critique Forbes for failing to account for physiological adaptations in benthic organisms.