Question

Difficulty: MediumCross-Text Connections: Perspective Comparison

Text 1
For decades, researchers debated the function of the narwhal’s (Monodon monocerosMonodon\ monoceros) elongated tusk. In a 2014 study, Martin Nweeia and colleagues proposed that the tusk serves as a sensory organ. By analyzing the tusk’s structure, they discovered millions of nerve endings connecting the outer environment to the narwhal's brain. Nweeia's team demonstrated that exposing the tusk to varying salinity levels triggered immediate changes in the whale’s heart rate, suggesting that narwhals use their tusks to detect oceanographic variations and navigate through Arctic ice.

Text 2
While the sensory hypothesis is intriguing, evolutionary biologist Zackary Graham argues that the narwhal tusk is primarily a product of sexual selection. Graham’s team analyzed physical measurements of hundreds of narwhals, finding that tusk length is highly variable among males of the same age, a trait characteristic of ornaments used to signal social status or attract mates. Furthermore, because females rarely grow tusks and survive without the sensory input they supposedly provide, Graham contends that the tusk’s primary function is as a visual signal in male-male competition, rather than a critical survival tool.

Based on the texts, how would Graham (Text 2) most likely characterize the finding in Text 1 that narwhals exhibit changes in heart rate when their tusks are exposed to different salinity levels?

  1. As a physiological response that, while genuine, does not demonstrate that the tusk is necessary for survival, since female narwhals navigate successfully without one.Answer
  2. B
    As a flawed finding that mistakenly attributes cardiovascular changes to salinity rather than to the stress of male-male competition.
  3. C
    As evidence that helps explain why male narwhals exhibit more erratic heart rates than female narwhals during seasonal migrations.
  4. D
    As support for his own theory that male narwhals use changes in ocean salinity to locate potential mates in icy waters.

Answer

As a physiological response that, while genuine, does not demonstrate that the tusk is necessary for survival, since female narwhals navigate successfully without one.
The author of Text 2 (Graham) argues that the narwhal tusk is a visual signal for sexual selection rather than a necessary sensory organ, pointing out that female narwhals survive successfully without one. Therefore, Graham would view the physiological changes in heart rate described in Text 1 as a reaction that does not prove the tusk is a vital tool for navigation and survival. This aligns with the option describing the response as a genuine physiological reaction that nevertheless fails to establish the tusk's necessity for survival.

Step-by-Step Solution

1
Identify the core argument and key finding in Text 1.
Text 1 presents a finding that narwhals show physiological heart rate changes in response to salinity, supporting the hypothesis that the tusk functions as a sensory organ for survival and navigation.
This establishes the premise from Text 1 that the Text 2 author needs to respond to.
2
Identify the stance and counterargument of the author in Text 2.
Text 2 (Graham) argues that the tusk is primarily a visual signal for sexual selection rather than a critical survival tool, pointing out that female narwhals lack the tusk yet survive without it.
This allows us to predict how Graham would interpret a sensory finding in light of his theory.
3
Synthesize how the author of Text 2 would view the specific finding of Text 1.
Graham would acknowledge the physiological reaction but argue it does not prove the tusk is essential for survival or navigation, since females survive without it.
This matches the correct option that characterizes the response without overextending or misrepresenting the arguments.

Key Concept

Analyzing cross-text connections and synthesizing how one author would respond to an argument or finding made by another author.
Rate this question